• NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

The Official Paracast Political Thread!

Free episodes:

Status
Not open for further replies.
Here in the U.K. the majority have had enough of the political mess and kicked the establishment in the bum by voting out of the EU.

With the way the world is going by lefty Liberals taking over, if you guys in the USA have the same feelings and are fed up with politicians not listening, could Trump get voted in?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Han
Nothing wrong with throwing the bastards out. But you have to find a bastard who is up to the job. Not a con man whose every achievement is clouded somehow.
 
Here in the U.K. the majority have had enough of the political mess and kicked the establishment in the bum by voting out of the EU.

With the way the world is going by lefty Liberals taking over, if you guys in the USA have the same feelings and are fed up with politicians not listening, could Trump get voted in?

With every passing day I'm not so sure Trump wants to be voted in. As I've mentioned from the start nearly every one of his moves seems to be designed to turn people off. People say he's just speaking his mind and maybe he is but I don't think he's ready to turn his businesses over to his kids and more and more I'm convinced he's setting himself up to be the next media king and I hear more and more commentators mention this as well. This isn't Venezuela, and so he isn't going to be able to do a four hour self promoting populist paean to himself as president. He can certainly do so as a private citizen and he'd got to be busting at the seams to do so. In this capacity He will be able to do this as a private citizen and arguably have a more bigly impact on the populace and do things unencumbered. Bottom Line, Dude wants to start a movement in his name and can do it just as easily without giving up anything he is accustomed to. I think anyone counting on a Trump presidency is going to be disappointed unless you get a charge of seeing a scorched earth policy after the election.


But I could be wrong.
 
I suppose I'd want to know if I was an American voter, is why has the incumbent Democratic administration been more secretive than previous governments and why they never took Rumsfeld to task over the missing trillions. It should be front page news every day until someone answers for the largest robbery or piece of accounting fraud ever perpetrated anywhere!

Why have Obama and Hillary Clinton never tried to make political capital out of such astonishing sums of money going 'missing' when the Republican Party was in charge?
 
Actually you have a point, nobody mentions what Rumsfeld said the day before 9/11. Not Bush, not his successors on the job, and certainly not the current administration. They are all hiding something there.
 
So therefore you didn't actually read the article. Figures.

As to Bernie Sanders, he actually did very well in the primaries, and any complaint that the votes were rigged is absolutely absurd. Yes, there were email exchanges and such. but nothing that actually led to a conspiracy.

Actually Gene, I did read it and it's simply misdirection with respect to immense REAL voter fraud rigged by the DNC. That's my point. Who cares if some impulsive windbag at Fox misquoted or posted information too quickly. CNNs only done that 10 times in the last week. Don't give me that nonsense about the DNC fraud not being true, or being mythical. According to who precisely? There is a ton of evidence supporting the fact the DNC rigged the elections. Of course there is rampant denial. That's what politics is all about these days.

Wikileaks Proves Primary Was Rigged: DNC Undermined Democracy

Hillary Clinton campaign blames leaked DNC emails about Sanders on Russia

Democrat confesses to rigging elections ‘for 50 years’

Nothing but constant denial and a shell game of misdirection from the liberal media. Hillaryous blames Trump for being treasonous and yet the facts point to her being a complete traitor and a thoroughly irresponsible SOS.
 
We all know, or anyone who has done their homework, that all those O'Keefe videos are deceptively edited and misleading. He even got arrested once for his pranks, which poople like you believe regardless of the truth. WND has no credibility whatever.

No, the DNC did not rig the primary. That's nonsense. It would require collusion not just by Democrats but by Republicans who manage the election commissions in many states. If they wanted to rig it against Sanders, they did a really bad job of it.
 
Here in the U.K. the majority have had enough of the political mess and kicked the establishment in the bum by voting out of the EU.

With the way the world is going by lefty Liberals taking over, if you guys in the USA have the same feelings and are fed up with politicians not listening, could Trump get voted in?

I understand that people were tricked into Brexit for the exact reasons you mention.

Britain was supposed to get a better deal! look at the value of sterling now.

Not only did we kick the politicians in the bum, we kicked ourselves in the head............

Where have you gone mr cameron, our lonely nation turns its eyes to you.

or as Frank Sinatra might have sung:

trump and farage, go together like a horse and carriage, ask the local gentry they will tell you its elementary, trump and farage........

If it makes me a lefty liberal so be it, but I for one am sick of people misusing and misrepresenting my flag.

I consider farage a traitor.
 
P.S. rather than complain about some of the offensive language directed at innocent parties (I know we all have a different interpretation of what is and isn't acceptable)
I am going to post an image that for me sums up trump:


surrender123resize.png

Beware of two headed monsters.
 

Attachments

  • surrender123.png
    surrender123.png
    580.2 KB · Views: 1
We all know, or anyone who has done their homework, that all those O'Keefe videos are deceptively edited and misleading. He even got arrested once for his pranks, which poople like you believe regardless of the truth. WND has no credibility whatever.

No, the DNC did not rig the primary. That's nonsense. It would require collusion not just by Democrats but by Republicans who manage the election commissions in many states. If they wanted to rig it against Sanders, they did a really bad job of it.

Bullpoop, and denial ain't just a river in Egypt.:confused:

Stanford Study Proves Election Fraud through Exit Poll Discrepancies

Clinton Iowa Caucus EXPOSED! Caught Committing VOTER FRAUD (Video)

Election Fraud Study Points To Rigged Democratic Primary Against Bernie Sanders [Video]

Wikileaks: DNC Committed Election Fraud Against Bernie Sanders
 
This wasn’t even a Stanford study.

Stanford Study Proves Election Fraud through Exit Poll Discrepancies

“WHAT'S FALSE: The paper was not a "Stanford Study," and its authors acknowledged their claims and research methodology had not been subject to any form of peer review or academic scrutiny.

And these quotes below:

Clinton Iowa Caucus EXPOSED! Caught Committing VOTER FRAUD (Video)

“Hillary Clinton’s campaign appears to have committed voter fraud in Polk County last night, during the Democrat Iowa Caucus.”

“Socialist candidate Bernie Sanders’ supporters are claiming that the county caucus chair Drew Gentsch in the video (below), along with precinct captain Elizabeth Buck, did not really count Clinton supporters. Instead, they were busy misleading the caucus-goers at precinct #43."

“This is a very serious, criminal accusation. As a Reddit user explained”

If this is so earth shattering, then where’s the big news of an indictment?

I could go on; however, there is very little chance of voter fraud as the truth is below. That is, unless National Public Radio is also part of a vast conspiracy.

Why Worries About Paperless Voting Loom Larger This Year
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Received the following via email the other day:

Is there a double standard for women in politics?

Imagine if it were Hillary Clinton who had had five children by three husbands, who had said it was fine to refer to her daughter as a “piece of ass,” who participated in a radio conversation about oral sex in a hot tub, who rated men based on their body parts, who showed up in Playboy soft porn videos.

Imagine if 15 men had accused Clinton of assaulting or violating them, with more stepping forward each day.

Imagine if in a primary election debate Clinton had boasted that there’s “no problem” with the size of her vagina.

Imagine if Clinton had less experience in government or the military than any person who has ever become president?

Imagine if she had said about a man running against her in the primaries, “Look at that face! Would anyone vote for that?”

Imagine if it were Clinton who had been caught on a hot mike referring in a degrading way to men’s genitals and boasting that her prominence gave her license to grab men’s crotches.

Imagine if she had bragged about her attempts to commit adultery — and later reportedly sought to have fired from his job the married man who resisted her seduction efforts.

Imagine if Clinton had defended herself from an accusation of molesting a young man by explaining, “He would not be my first choice, that I can tell you.”

Imagine if Hillary Clinton had first drawn national attention not with an idealistic speech at the Wellesley commencement, but by being sued for racial discrimination by President Richard Nixon’s administration.

Imagine if she had later been quoted by a member of her staff as saying “laziness is a trait in blacks” and had retweeted white supremacists, including one honoring the American Nazi Party.

Imagine if it were Clinton who had ordered $100,000 worth of pianos from a small music store in Freehold, New Jersey, and then announced months after taking delivery that she would pay only $70,000. And if the owner recalled: “Because of Clinton, my store stagnated for a couple of years. It made me feel really bad, like I’d been taken advantage of. I was embarrassed.”

Imagine if it were Hillary Clinton who had denounced international trade while manufacturing shirts in Bangladesh, neck ties in China, suits in Mexico and stemware in Slovenia.

Imagine if Clinton had boasted on Howard Stern’s radio show that “in the history of the world, nobody has got more hot men than I have” — and referred to those men she had seduced as her “victims.” What if she were called a sex predator on the show, and she nodded proudly?

Imagine if PolitiFact had judged 71 percent of Clinton’s statements that it checked “mostly false” or worse.

Imagine that, instead of releasing 39 years of tax returns, showing most recently that she had paid 31 percent of her income in federal income taxes, she had refused to release any returns — and leaked pages from 1995 returns indicated that she had paid no federal income taxes at all for years.

Imagine if Clinton had rampaged for a week against a former beauty queen, and even tweeted encouragement to “check out sex tape” of the woman — even though such a video did not exist.

Imagine if Clinton had been so lecherous that her daughter, at age 17, made her promise not to date any boy younger than 17. And if Clinton then joked publicly that as a result “the field is getting very limited.”

Imagine if Clinton had seemed completely ignorant of nuclear strategy and NATO yet said she knew “more about ISIS than the generals.”

Imagine if the Clinton Foundation had failed to register properly, had made an illegal campaign donation and had expended resources not on saving lives from AIDS but (possibly illegally) on two giant portraits of Hillary Clinton herself.

So is there a double standard in American politics, indeed in American society, subjecting women to greater scrutiny? You decide.​
 
Received the following via email the other day:

Is there a double standard for women in politics?

Imagine if it were Hillary Clinton who had had five children by three husbands, who had said it was fine to refer to her daughter as a “piece of ass,” who participated in a radio conversation about oral sex in a hot tub, who rated men based on their body parts, who showed up in Playboy soft porn videos.

Imagine if 15 men had accused Clinton of assaulting or violating them, with more stepping forward each day.

Imagine if in a primary election debate Clinton had boasted that there’s “no problem” with the size of her vagina.

Imagine if Clinton had less experience in government or the military than any person who has ever become president?

Imagine if she had said about a man running against her in the primaries, “Look at that face! Would anyone vote for that?”

Imagine if it were Clinton who had been caught on a hot mike referring in a degrading way to men’s genitals and boasting that her prominence gave her license to grab men’s crotches.

Imagine if she had bragged about her attempts to commit adultery — and later reportedly sought to have fired from his job the married man who resisted her seduction efforts.

Imagine if Clinton had defended herself from an accusation of molesting a young man by explaining, “He would not be my first choice, that I can tell you.”

Imagine if Hillary Clinton had first drawn national attention not with an idealistic speech at the Wellesley commencement, but by being sued for racial discrimination by President Richard Nixon’s administration.

Imagine if she had later been quoted by a member of her staff as saying “laziness is a trait in blacks” and had retweeted white supremacists, including one honoring the American Nazi Party.

Imagine if it were Clinton who had ordered $100,000 worth of pianos from a small music store in Freehold, New Jersey, and then announced months after taking delivery that she would pay only $70,000. And if the owner recalled: “Because of Clinton, my store stagnated for a couple of years. It made me feel really bad, like I’d been taken advantage of. I was embarrassed.”

Imagine if it were Hillary Clinton who had denounced international trade while manufacturing shirts in Bangladesh, neck ties in China, suits in Mexico and stemware in Slovenia.

Imagine if Clinton had boasted on Howard Stern’s radio show that “in the history of the world, nobody has got more hot men than I have” — and referred to those men she had seduced as her “victims.” What if she were called a sex predator on the show, and she nodded proudly?

Imagine if PolitiFact had judged 71 percent of Clinton’s statements that it checked “mostly false” or worse.

Imagine that, instead of releasing 39 years of tax returns, showing most recently that she had paid 31 percent of her income in federal income taxes, she had refused to release any returns — and leaked pages from 1995 returns indicated that she had paid no federal income taxes at all for years.

Imagine if Clinton had rampaged for a week against a former beauty queen, and even tweeted encouragement to “check out sex tape” of the woman — even though such a video did not exist.

Imagine if Clinton had been so lecherous that her daughter, at age 17, made her promise not to date any boy younger than 17. And if Clinton then joked publicly that as a result “the field is getting very limited.”

Imagine if Clinton had seemed completely ignorant of nuclear strategy and NATO yet said she knew “more about ISIS than the generals.”

Imagine if the Clinton Foundation had failed to register properly, had made an illegal campaign donation and had expended resources not on saving lives from AIDS but (possibly illegally) on two giant portraits of Hillary Clinton herself.

So is there a double standard in American politics, indeed in American society, subjecting women to greater scrutiny? You decide.​
There is a double standard right here within this forum. You just dismiss Hillary's carpet munching adulterous Affairs along with her husbands sexual scandals and substitute with this biasd email?

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk
 
I was watching the Discovery Channel the other night. There was a group of monkeys squabbling over a banana in a clearing. There was this one monkey who would upon occasion emerge from behind a coconut tree and wildly throw a coconut at the group and then conceal itself behind the tree.
 
I have not made a deal of anyone having adulterous relationships. We know about Bill Clinton and we know about Donald Trump. The claim that Hillary has had affairs is unproven, but it doesn't matter, really.

In all this, the Clintons managed to stay together. Trump just dumps them.
 
Received the following via email the other day:

Is there a double standard for women in politics?

Imagine if it were Hillary Clinton who had had five children by three husbands, who had said it was fine to refer to her daughter as a “piece of ass,” who participated in a radio conversation about oral sex in a hot tub, who rated men based on their body parts, who showed up in Playboy soft porn videos.

Imagine if 15 men had accused Clinton of assaulting or violating them, with more stepping forward each day.

Imagine if in a primary election debate Clinton had boasted that there’s “no problem” with the size of her vagina.

Imagine if Clinton had less experience in government or the military than any person who has ever become president?

Imagine if she had said about a man running against her in the primaries, “Look at that face! Would anyone vote for that?”

Imagine if it were Clinton who had been caught on a hot mike referring in a degrading way to men’s genitals and boasting that her prominence gave her license to grab men’s crotches.

Imagine if she had bragged about her attempts to commit adultery — and later reportedly sought to have fired from his job the married man who resisted her seduction efforts.

Imagine if Clinton had defended herself from an accusation of molesting a young man by explaining, “He would not be my first choice, that I can tell you.”

Imagine if Hillary Clinton had first drawn national attention not with an idealistic speech at the Wellesley commencement, but by being sued for racial discrimination by President Richard Nixon’s administration.

Imagine if she had later been quoted by a member of her staff as saying “laziness is a trait in blacks” and had retweeted white supremacists, including one honoring the American Nazi Party.

Imagine if it were Clinton who had ordered $100,000 worth of pianos from a small music store in Freehold, New Jersey, and then announced months after taking delivery that she would pay only $70,000. And if the owner recalled: “Because of Clinton, my store stagnated for a couple of years. It made me feel really bad, like I’d been taken advantage of. I was embarrassed.”

Imagine if it were Hillary Clinton who had denounced international trade while manufacturing shirts in Bangladesh, neck ties in China, suits in Mexico and stemware in Slovenia.

Imagine if Clinton had boasted on Howard Stern’s radio show that “in the history of the world, nobody has got more hot men than I have” — and referred to those men she had seduced as her “victims.” What if she were called a sex predator on the show, and she nodded proudly?

Imagine if PolitiFact had judged 71 percent of Clinton’s statements that it checked “mostly false” or worse.

Imagine that, instead of releasing 39 years of tax returns, showing most recently that she had paid 31 percent of her income in federal income taxes, she had refused to release any returns — and leaked pages from 1995 returns indicated that she had paid no federal income taxes at all for years.

Imagine if Clinton had rampaged for a week against a former beauty queen, and even tweeted encouragement to “check out sex tape” of the woman — even though such a video did not exist.

Imagine if Clinton had been so lecherous that her daughter, at age 17, made her promise not to date any boy younger than 17. And if Clinton then joked publicly that as a result “the field is getting very limited.”

Imagine if Clinton had seemed completely ignorant of nuclear strategy and NATO yet said she knew “more about ISIS than the generals.”

Imagine if the Clinton Foundation had failed to register properly, had made an illegal campaign donation and had expended resources not on saving lives from AIDS but (possibly illegally) on two giant portraits of Hillary Clinton herself.

So is there a double standard in American politics, indeed in American society, subjecting women to greater scrutiny? You decide.​
There is a double standard right here within this forum. You just dismiss Hillary's carpet munching adulterous Affairs along with her husbands sexual scandals and substitute with this biasd email?

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top