Latest activity

These clips are real. And real frightening.

Rick Osmon worked in the defense industry for more than 25 years in sensor systems acquisition and testing. Radar, LIDAR, Night vision, laser aiming and target designation systems, and navigation aids were his main areas of regard. He brought...

So for our new promo, instead of calling The Paracast "the gold standard of paranormal radio," how about "The Paracast is brat!" Or not!

So for our new promo, instead of calling The Paracast "the gold standard of paranormal radio," how about "The Paracast is brat!" Or not!

It's not sufficient to prove it conclusively--i.e. physical evidence in the public domain isn't--but it is highly suggestive of an unknown (or unearthly) phenomenon.

I neglected to answer this. If you're referring to pics of junk in Ramey's office, there are excellent grounds to doubt them. As records indicate #4 was cancelled, and even if the balloons released did reach the ranch--considered highly...

In the case of Roswell, nobody disputes something came down, and testimony points to something highly unusual.

Well, of course, there has to be a crime.

Even when no murder is known to have occurred?

May he rest in peace. His music and that of the rest of the four tops will stand in memoriam to some of the best music ever made.

Abdul Duke Fakir was the last original member of the Four Tops. So let's reach out: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/jul/22/abdul-duke-fakir-four-tops-dead

Abdul Duke Fakir was the last original member of the Four Tops. So let's reach out: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/jul/22/abdul-duke-fakir-four-tops-dead

As Gene said, witness testimony, if credible, is sufficient to convict.

Greg Eghigian is Professor of History and Bioethics at Penn State University (USA). He is a historian of science and medicine, specializing in studying the ways in which society thinks about and treats people, ideas, and behaviors it considers to...

Greg Eghigian is Professor of History and Bioethics at Penn State University (USA). He is a historian of science and medicine, specializing in studying the ways in which society thinks about and treats people, ideas, and behaviors it considers to...

So let's see your habeas corpus... there isn't one.

UFO cases are very heavily oriented towards eyewitness testimony, and physical evidence is seldom encountered. Even then most or all of that evidence is not sufficient to demonstrate an unknown phenomenon is afoot. But eyewitness testimony under...

But not WORTHWHILE evidence; would you convict a person for a major crime based on no better evidence?

Like I just said, there's evidence for something extraordinary and for a confiscation of material, hence a coverup. I didn't say there was conclusive proof lay people are privy to.

1) The claim does not create the reality. 2) The photos were printed; there is no reason to doubt them. 3) I have seen no extraordinary proof of a coverup. Or that Randle was correct.

I just picked up his new book since I thought he had some interesting things to say about Roswell.

Nobody, to my knowledge, ever claimed there were. Certainly nobody with the credibility of a base intel Major. I didn't say witness testimony proved the phenomenon. But it's still evidence something highly unusual came down in '47 and its...

The Paracast Newsletter July 21, 2024 www.theparacast.com Retired State Department Translator Joel Stern Reveals the Details of an Amazing Poltergeist Case on The Paracast! The Paracast is released every Sunday and available from our site...

I'm still waiting a manifesto of the shooter to pop up. They usually have one.

So I can assume undetectable tiny pink unicorns in my sock drawer, since they can't be disproven? That's not how science works. And no amount of mere words can prove a new phenomenon. Marcel proved only that he had a functioning larynx, that's...

Not in the public domain, but again you can't assume something doesn't exist just because the public doesn't have access to it. Also, while we don't have recorded testimony (about this) dating from '47, there was still adequate first hand...

Where are the 1947 reports of weird material? Nowhere. In real life, there was none.

In fact Marcel, originally interviewed by Friedman in '78, essentially reopened the case. 1978/80 may have been long after '47 but there was still good first hand testimony.

Nonsense, as Randle's research shows. Witnesses reported unusual metallic debris not balloons. Had it been just balloons the base intel officer would've identified them quickly and easily. A base intel officer and his son are credible, and like...

I believe you. But I'm picturing Garak telling Sisko, "All you've lost is self respect!" Science Fiction Theatre s 2 : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive is worth a watch. That link altered ; S2#6 is it.