Wade
FeralNormal master
You mean like Miss Piggy and Miss Housekeeping?
Yeah but in Trump's eyes I think that constitutes positive reinforcement.
NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!
You mean like Miss Piggy and Miss Housekeeping?
Without rose colored glasses. And that's before we began wondering how smart a businessman Trump was to lose nearly a billion dollars. Oh, wait, it's just a paper loss, a "writedown," meaning on paper and not a physical loss. Regardless, if Trump had taken his inheritance from his dad and just invested it, he'd be lots richer today. When you read about the crap he pulled with his casinos in the late 1980s and early 1990s, you'd be embarrassed how incompetent he was with other people's money. He also stiffed contractors and, as a result of his bankruptcies, people lost their jobs. When you look at Trump's scandals, think of the rain of raisins in that John Oliver video. He was a little too conservative, though. Each raisin creates 1,000 more.There is a nice couple across the street who are hardcore Republicans. Every Presidential election they put their candidate’s sign out in their front yard. It’s been interesting to watch the movement of their sign this year as Trump continues to make an embarrassing spectacle of himself. About a month ago they had the sign out there prominent right next to the street. They then moved it back between a tree and a bush where it was difficult to see. After last week, they have taken the Trump sign totally out of their yard.
John Oliver takes a look at Clinton scandals vs Trump scandals:
That’s what I read as well, but I decided in choosing the lesser, because it’s an unbelievably mind-boggling number.I think it's 22 million emails
You mean like Miss Piggy and Miss Housekeeping?
And the blood coming out of Megan Kelly's "wherever"?Yeah but in Trump's eyes I think that constitutes positive reinforcement.
He must get bored sitting on that "Golden Throne" in his marble-inlaid bathroom.That’s what I read as well, but I decided in choosing the lesser, because it’s an unbelievably mind-boggling number.
Who in their right mind would toilet Tweet at 3 a.m. insisting their loyal following view a non-existent sex tape?
A “turd tornado” …
You mean like Miss Piggy and Miss Housekeeping?
It is not funny. That demonstrates Trump is a sociopath. He cares not about anyone around him, except perhaps for his kids, which he uses as signs of pride and ego fulfillment.How in the name of misconstrued tabloid level nonsense is glib humor, a jab, or a "rip" being a racist, sexist, or against handicapped people? Gene, this is the very type of ridiculousness I am referring to.
Is this “tabloid trash’ or “glib humor”?
Just a simple yes or no.
It is not funny. That demonstrates Trump is a sociopath. He cares not about anyone around him, except perhaps for his kids, which he uses as signs of pride and ego fulfillment.
The fact-checkers confirm that Trump tells many more lies than Clinton. So that's not a factor. Openly speaking one's mind with lies and contradictions (sometimes in the same paragraph) is hardly a measure of one's suitability for any political post.
Just like this: Hillary Clinton Caught Calling Jewish People... - World Politicus It's called hearsay. In other words, it's very difficult, if not impossible, to know whether it was the actual truth of what he said, or not. But here's the thing, you know what? I'd MUCH rather have someone that openly speaks their mind for President than someone who's a total fake hypocrite like Hillaryous the OJ of the White House. The whole idea that no one here that's a Hillary supporter, or the thoroughly dangerous and irresponsibly negligent person that Clinton has already proven herself to be, as having never called people names, and made thoroughly derisive and demeaning commentary about people you don't like, is utter BS. Doing as much behind the other person's back IMO just makes you worse. Much worse.
Stop with the self righteous charade.
Lets look at some facts well apart from hearsay, shall we? Benghazi: What the report reveals about Hillary Clinton
So, let me get this straight. According to you, when someone calls someone a derogatory name, which has NEVER been verified, something that "supposedly" happened 30 years ago, that qualifies them as a sociopath. Ok. I guess we are living on planet Psycho.
ROTFLOL!! I'm telling you, you just can't make this stuff up! What fact checkers precisely? Oh, you mean the ones that support Hillaryous. It gets better everyday!
If not mistaken, what you are implying here is the woman is lying, this never occurred, she’s the one who’s the psychopath?
I’m not big on Hillary, Bernie, the Johnson, or Stein. I will say that I find the possibility of Trump Tweeting the launch codes from his bathroom in the wee-wee hours of the morning quite disturbing.
You’ve probably heard of suicide by cop, right? Here’s a new one..., suicide by Trump.
Somewhat informed, yes, self-righteous, no.
By the way, you never really answered my question, so let me re-frame it.
If you were to discover that the woman who has alleged to have been called the "C-word" was telling the unvarnished truth, would you find Trump's comment offensive?
Look at his behaviour.This is bullshit. Trump is neither a racist, nor is he anti handicapped, nor is he anti women. Please provide me a serious quote, not glib humor, within context, not just 5 consecutive words completely removed from their context like princess hillaryous's ad campaign is famous for, where Trump forwards his philosophical belief that one race is superior to, or "over" another, or that men are clearly superior to women, or that handicapped people are a waste of money, or whatever. You can't. Why would you allow yourself to be programmed with such utter nonsense?
OK, up until now I have just been lightly playing along because I support, and will be voting for Trump in November. This is definitely not because I like or condone the precise individual that he is, personality and otherwise. I have stated why I am voting for him and there is simply no denying these facts. S.R.L., this country that is the USA has become utterly pathetic by comparison to what it once was. There was a time when this nation had an identity and no this was not an idea based on skin color or religious convictions and persuasion. There was a time, actually a very short time ago, when the citizenry of the USA were not enslaved in terms of being taxed to death, and the USA had practically no national debt whatsoever. It was time when it was TRULY GREAT to be an American. There was a very real sense of loyalty and dedication here. Now, all we once had has been lost due to a single and absolute (proved beyond question) cause. That cause can clearly and evidently be summed up in one word, politician. This S.R.L. is the ONLY thing I am offended by Trump has no history with these ultra secret political elitists and their globally motivated and participated within, oligarchic organized quasi political regime. None.
Would you honestly vote for a presidential candidate whose ONLY reason for not rotting in jail right now is because she is exempt from the law due to just such an evil and blatantly false sense of elitist defined and granted empowerment? One that would in fact serve to perpetuate the politically induced death march that our once great country has been marching downward within for almost as long as I've been alive? Or would you vote to uproot the tyranny and oppression that enslaves so many of us, all for the gain of so elite and untouchable a few?
As far as me personally being offended goes: He didn't exactly call Mother Theresa the c-word, if he called anyone anything at all. Remember, this could easily be 100% politically motivated strategic BS. This was a reporter that has no current credentials as a reporter, but at the time should have had MUCH more professional tact than to stick her nose where it didn't belong in an intentional effort to prick Trump's pride in a business deal gone sour for him, as well as a reporter that after doing so should have had much more professionally obligatory thick skin than her SELF RIGHTEOUS pretense opportunistically feigns. In the context of that which honestly matters not some 30 years later with respect to the CURRENT presidential election, and considering the tabloid leveled quality of (hearsay) that the accusation that Trump called someone the c-word in a fit of outrage over making public information he perceived as being very negative and uncalled for, yes it was very offensive. He meant it to be. That is, if, it ever happened at all.
I am far more offended by the manner in which the USA's public justice system can be so easily manipulated, and the fact that Hillaryous is not comfy in a jail cell somewhere. This kind of OJ Simpson justice is the real essence of the aforementioned evil in action.