This is why I ignore Mr. Loren for the most part. Without even reading or listening to Dr. Bem's recent interview, he dismisses the research out of hand. If he had even glanced at the article and then commented as moderator, that would have been fine. But to dismiss what was left is where skeptical and debunker start to interpenetrate, in my opinion. At least I took the effort to look over his offerings, which Dr. Bem addresses in his interview. And as Gene stated “we're explorers,” which would suggest to me that if there are stones to be turned over, we should turn over those stones. And we're not talking about Uri Geller here, were discussing PSI research. And who said anything about a “team?”, as the underdog always has the uphill fight, and according to you, the hunter gatherer . Maybe talking monkeys will be flying out of pigs butts, but in the meantime I will continue turning over stones.
No need to insult people.
I did review the article, several times. What makes you think I haven't? The first time I heard about it was in Wired in November of 2010.
You shouldn't ignore what I post - I don't ignore what you post. As I said, Bem's research is interesting, but other scientists are having a hard time replicating it. I do understand that some scientists have replicated it though, so it'll be interesting when that research is presented.
P.S. It's an "I" not an "L."