• NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

Incredible New Moon Photo

Forums New posts
I'm half-joking. What I said is based on the idea that a government has either discovered ant-gravity itself or back-engineered some exotic ufo!

Who knows if any of that is true. I am strongly leaning toward some ufos being non-human though, and if one can accept that, one can accept almost all related phenomena.

I think man went to the moon but Jesus, to do it in under 10 years? If that is not paranormal I don't know what is!

By the way, does anyone know if calculations are available for the fuel required to get the capsule from the lunar lander back up to meet the other part? I've always thought it looked like that thing just accelerated so quick. Explosive bolts was it?
I know the moon has far less gravity and you can orbit the moon at a far lower altitude than is possible on earth. So what does it take to launch something from Apollo's landing sites up into lunar orbit? How much fuel etc?
 
I think it's 1/6 the gravity of
Earth so it would take considerably less fuel, but maybe not because it's a vacuum. As far as that lift off, it looked like what one would see on a Buck Rogers episode :)
 
GeoShift said:
What I don't understand is why hasn't anyone else gone to the moon since the last time we supposedly landed there. Billions were spent to supposedly go to the moon in the past so it's to expensive for any other nation to go, or for us to go back? It's just not possible given the myriad of logistical problems to carry it out?
Click to expand...

We are there now. Kinda.

Were is the LRO?
 
GeoShift said:
I think it's 1/6 the gravity of
Earth so it would take considerably less fuel, but maybe not because it's a vacuum. As far as that lift off, it looked like what one would see on a Buck Rogers episode :)
Click to expand...

Yeah its 1/6 the gravity

The ascent module weighed 10,024 lb
And it was driven by 3,500 lbf (pounds of force)


The pressure vessle of the LM was about the thickness of an aluminum can (the “walls” outside the pressurized area were only foil)

That it took off like a bat out of hell doesnt surprise me
 
vesvehighfolk said:
this is a copy of an email I sent to snorry please write him and let him know of this fraud!


Dear george; the photo of a pyrimid on the moon is a fake. the object was added later by photo shop many sites on the internet have already shown it to be fake. I will ask you google this since I do not know if your filters will allow links. Hogland moon photo fake. please check this out asap george your listeners deserve the truth.
Bob Watson
Click to expand...


Its been a bit since i sent this no word from noory on or off the air... as I suspected...
 
Son of a Skunk already pointed out the area that to me looks like the only thing that could be "the ziggurat" I found something else interesting though, what do you guys think of these things? I created a graphic...
MyMoonpicParacast.jpg
 
Look at it on the original pic if its not clear on mine... To me there are clear signs of ordered rows, possibly buildings... Looks like some sort if complex...
 
You could be right. There is plenty interesting stuff in the vicinity of the ziggurat even without it on the original photo. I've drawn arrows to them in an earlier post and they include objects coming away from the ground leaving long shadows. Also there is a perfect equilateral triangle which is strange in itself. Look at my previous post in this thread and see if you agree.
 
Their heroism is undoubtable, first they strap themselves to a small A bomb

The Saturn 5 was the largest rocket ever built by the United States. A true monster of a launch vehicle, it generated over 33 million newtons of thrust at liftoff and carried 2.5 million kilograms of fuel and oxidizer. If the Saturn 5 exploded, it could do so with the force of a small atomic bomb, the equivalent of half a kiloton, or about 1/26 the size of the bomb that destroyed Hiroshima. Naturally, this was a significant concern for Apollo program officials.
Click to expand...

LOL bugger the officials, significant concern belongs to the guys sitting on top of it

Then they leave our habitat behind

24818_10150165020230384_1260326_n.jpg


And have to trust in technology that today we would consider primative, to bring them safely back to that mote of dust suspended in a sunbeam.

Tightens my nuts and bolts just to think about it
 
Goggsmackay, yeah I do see interesting stuff in your blow up too, but I'm not sure I see the triangle or if that's just an artifact... Personally I believe there is a ton of stuff on the moon that we should know about that is being hidden from us...
 
inc0gneato said:
Goggsmackay, yeah I do see interesting stuff in your blow up too, but I'm not sure I see the triangle or if that's just an artifact... Personally I believe there is a ton of stuff on the moon that we should know about that is being hidden from us...
Click to expand...

If you look at the triangle I drew on the pic, then compare with the same phot without my red lines you can see what looks like that perfect triangle. I drew the lines of the triangle exactly on the edges so you can only see on the pic without my drawings. I don't think it is an object on the surface but it is still very weird to have such a geometrically perfect equilateral triangle on anything that is not artificial.
 
Cheers Ryan. I'm all for sending missions to Mars as JPL have just done but can you imagine if we (NASA) put the same effort into looking at anomalies on the moon? I imagine you could do much more if you only need get as far as the moon, for the same size initial launch rocket etc.

Hoagland might really be spoiling the fact there are indeed strange things on the moon- and that is no theory, astronomers have recorded such things for centuries. What about 'the shard' and 'the castle' and a hundred other things. Come to think of it - there are better places on Mars JPL could be looking at!
 
I only know of Mike Bara cos of his co-writing that NASA book with Hoagland. It's a shame that there may be some truth in what they wrote, I certainly don't think everything Hoagland has done regarding Cydonia etc is B.S but I think most of us agree Hoagland has totally lost the plot. If that is not the case then he is cleverly and cynically milking the 'believer' cow.

Mike Bara is then guilty by association. I am not in the least surprised your comment was not approved in the blog.

I would love to hear Bara on the show but it wont happen. I can't remember if Gene has ever said he's tried to get Hoagland on the show but I would imagine he has. If Dick wont do it, I'll wager Mike wont either.

(I'm still waiting to find out what 'hyper-dimensional physics' actually is.)
 
trainedobserver said:
That had to be one hell of a ride don't you know? They were standing up when they hit go! Talk about your steely eyed missile men! Those were some brave and very, very, tough minded guys.
Click to expand...



mike said:
Their heroism is undoubtable, first they strap themselves to a small A bomb



LOL bugger the officials, significant concern belongs to the guys sitting on top of it

Then they leave our habitat behind

24818_10150165020230384_1260326_n.jpg


And have to trust in technology that today we would consider primative, to bring them safely back to that mote of dust suspended in a sunbeam.

Tightens my nuts and bolts just to think about it
Click to expand...


they never landed according to these shrewdies.

Moon Landings Hoax - WikiSpooks


Stanislav Pokrovsky
Dr Stanislav Georgievich Pokrovsky (b. 1959)[191] is a Russian candidate of technical sciences and General Director of the scientific-manufacturing enterprise "Project-D-MSK".[192]

In 2007, he studied the filmed staging of the first stage (S-IC) of the Saturn V rocket after the launch of Apollo 11.[193] Analysing it frame by frame, he calculated the actual speed of the Saturn V rocket at S-IC staging time using four different, independent and mutually verifying methods. With all of them, the calculated speed turned out to be at maximum half (1.2 km/s) of the declared one at that point (2.4 km/s). He concluded that due to this, no more than 28 t could be brought on the way to the Moon, including the spacecraft, instead of the 46 t declared by NASA, and so a loop around the Moon was possible but not a manned landing on the Moon with return to the Earth.[194][195][196][197]

In 2008, Pokrovsky also claimed to have determined the reason why a higher speed was impossible—problems with the Inconel X-750 superalloy used for the tubes of the wall of the thrust chamber of the F-1 engine,[198] whose physics of high-temperature strength was not yet studied at that time. The strength of the material changes when affected by high temperature and plastic deformations. As a result, the F-1 engine thrust had to be lowered by at least 20%. With these assumptions, he calculated that the real speed would be the same as he had already estimated (see above). Pokrovsky proved that six or more F-1 engines (instead of five) could not be used due to the increased fuel mass required by each new engine, which in turn would require more engines, and so on.[196][197][199][200]
http://wikispooks.com/wiki/Moon_Landings_Hoax
Pokrovsky claims that his Saturn V speed estimation is the "first direct proof of the impossibility of the Apollo Moon landing".[192] He says that fifteen specialists with scientific degrees (e.g. Alexander Budnik)[201] who reviewed his paper, of which at least five aerodynamics experts and three narrow specialists in ultrasonic movement and aerosols, raised no objections in principle, and the specific wishes and notes they (e.g. Vladimir Surdin)[202] did have could not change his results significantly even if followed.[203][204] Pokrovsky compares his own frame-by-frame analysis of the filmed Saturn V flight to the frame-by-frame analysis of the filmed Trinity nuclear test (1945) done by the Soviet academician Leonid Sedov who created his own blast wave theory to estimate the then top secret power of the explosion.[205]

See also author's note below.[206] Pokrovsky's findings about the rocket speed were later confirmed by Alexander Reshnyak and Alexander Popov (see below) and his smoke lag method proven to be valid.[207]
http://wikispooks.com/wiki/Moon_Landings_Hoax
 
Last edited:
Back
Top