SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY A PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, five years young! For a low subscription fee, you will be able to download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive After The Paracast podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! FLASH! For a limited time, you can save up to 40% on your subscription. You can sign up right here!
So on one hand you do mean the same Hank Wesselmann who, according to Wikkipedia, claims to have been in contact with "Nainoa", an ethnic Hawaiian kahuna (shaman) living some 5,000 years in our future, but on the other hand you say "It was not a yes." when I asked you if that was who you were referring to. I find it ironic that you would choose to wait for me to show "evidence of thought" when you yourself seem to be confused and have chosen to simply hand-wave the reference material.Yes, he probably is Hank. But Wikipedia knows as much as the person is allowed to say - it is censored. And it is what many fools play with for fun. I find your 'tude' less than deserving and will await some evidence of thought before going further with you.
We can see what you said. But what's your point? I mean just because Wesselmann thinks he's in contact with an ethnic Hawaiian kahuna (shaman) living some 5,000 years in our future doesn't mean he might not have something less nonsensical to contribute. Or maybe that's not even relevant to the point you're trying to make, which is what again? Try to stay focused please. Can you sum-up what Wesselmann has to do with this discussion in a single paragraph less than 10 lines long?
Well that's less than 10 lines alright, I'll give you that much. LOL. Too bad it doesn't contain anything of substance.Ha, trolling and strolling
Not going or DOing
Just trolling and growling
While quaking and making
Not me are you screwing
Yes, you have proven how easy it is to denigrate people time and time again.I notice the Nazi gang is encouraging and 'liking' each other avoid discussing Time effects such as contact demonstrated (even in the Wiki article). Is that because they don't wish exposure of their long held BELIEFS? Is it because they pretend to understand modern physics which clearly states Time is variable and a co-efficient? No doubt the same people will believe in alien intervention rather than the Philosopher's Stone which has been able to 'see' the future for many millennia.
Yes, it is 'easy' to denigrate...
Maybe another way to put it is " i know there's a pony in here somewhere"?Apologies in advance for the hackneyed phrase useage. This in no way takes away from the hidden gems of ideas proposed, well, actually it does then I get things wrong all the time.
When it comes to @Robert Baird I'm not really sure how to read him. I'm reluctant to conclude that all the posts are a preconceived strategy to disrupt the forum and frustrate participants, because for someone to do all that as a preconceived plan would IMO indicate a rather serious personality disorder that manifests itself in malicious manner, yet he seems to be implying that it's others who are intentionally trying to get to him somehow, as if he's the victim.Robert Baird, you can't be calling other members Nazis. People can like what they want to like.
You need to chill out because you're really starting to frustrate a growing amount of members. We don't want to ban people, but we will if we need to. Please, you need to stop this behaviour.