derekcbart said:
Here’s the point douche: A lot of the 2012 claims are interpretations of dead languages or codices. Apparently, you fail to see that because you are to busy trying to “prove” me wrong based on the word culture. You want to critique posts on semantics rather than contribute something meaningful.
Here’s the summary for those of you tired of reading us go back and forth (I am done with this thread after this point).
My contribution: Mckenna, King Wen, and the fact that these have been interpreted in the same way as the Maya codices makes them valid 2012 cultural relics because they are all based on speculation. Also, I posited an analogy of Egyptian hieroglyphics that many people misconstrue to be a helicopter similar to misinterpretations of McKenna and the Dresden Codec.
Your contribution: Incorrectly lookup King Wen, pretend China has not a culture, repost my timewave zero contribution in the form of novelty theory, and fail to see the similarities to an analogous (mis)interpretation of Egyptian hieroglyphics…oh, and rely heavily on wikipedia as a sole source for information.
I believe that about sums it up. Now I wait for an annoying, retaliatory remark from you showing how you were correct all along and that wikipedia is not your favorite site, this is:
Temporarily Disabled
Good day.