Many landing traces have been associated with landings of UFOs, or flying craft unlike anything familiar.
Yet not one has been unequivocally stated as extraterrestrial in origin, simply because it would be impossible to do so with the lack of any physical evidence showing thus. Any and all trace elements have shown heat dispersal, changes in vegetation, but not one site has given us any insight into how or why or what originated.
Among other things, there have been radar sightings of fast walkers that enter the atmosphere from above and leave the same way.
Which prove what? Fast walkers....objects that walk fast? No. Objects which move fast in the heavens....Which show nothing in terms of their origination or from what or why they occur. Most are considered anomalous in nature, and those which have solubility are classified as "Unidentified Flying Objects" as was and continues to be my point. Notice the "Un" in "Unidentified".....it means not able to be identified as any classification other than a flying object. We have flying objects doing all sorts of strange maneuvers in the atmosphere as well. Does this mean they come just from outer space?
Not too many government people look like grays.
Actually it's the other way around. Not so many grays look like people, and for this reason we have such trouble proving their existence. When and if you ever get a body or have one touch down and present us with his existence, then and only then will you have a leg to stand on. Until then the entire idea is merely theory and nothing more.
"Lucifer"--not a scientific concept, it seems...
Nor are little gray aliens without so much as one iota of proof. Satan (The Devil), as we call him in his fallen state, has placed his calling card in many areas of this world. In fact since we use "landing zones" as a way to enlighten the reader about "evidence", how about the many stories of the Devil placing his footprints, etc, in places:
At the ruined Kirk of Lady, near Overbister on Sanday, Orkney, are the Devil's Fingermarks, incised as parallel grooves into the parapet of the kirk. In North Kingstown is a large, granite ledge known as Devil's Foot Rock. Legends going back to the colonial era tell of a squaw being chased by the devil. Some say that she fled from Boston. Her pursuer is said to have left his footprints at Devil's Foot Rock, then at Chimney Hill in South Kingstown, and finally at Block Island.
The devil's talons at Saint Pancras church. *(Which I have seen by the way...really interesting)
At Dol de Bretagne in Brittany are found the claw mark of the devil on Mont Dol as well as the footprints of St. Michael. Near Holmfirth in Yorkshire, the devil left his footprints as scorch marks on Netherton Edge. One day, the devil disguised himself as a druid in an attempt to gain favour with the old priests but was discovered in his plans and so, in anger, flew out across the hills carrying a great stone with him, which he dropped from the skies, and it landed where the Hood Hill Stone still remains. Also, in anger, he jumped down and stood on the great rock and in doing so, left his footprint impressed upon the stone. The site is at Kilburn, Northallerton, in Yorkshire. In Lancashire, the devil threw stones at Clitheroe Castle and left his footprints in Deerstones Quarry near Pendle. At Castle Bentheim in Germany, there is a curious smooth rock that the devil used as a pillow, leaving behind an imprint of his ear. In Cologne, on a heavy stone called Teufelsstein, are imprinted the hands and talons of the devil. The Lugenstein in the cathedral square at Halberstadt was carried there by the devil to destroy the cathedral. It was too heavy, and he dropped it, leaving behind an imprint of his red hot thumb.
Sir Fergus Barclay, also known as the De'il of Ardrossan, was a horseman, famous around the lands for his tremendous skill. The secret to his skill, however, was a magical bridle, which was given to Barclay by the devil, in exchange for his soul. However, the devil was tricked by Barclay into giving his soul back. Infuriated by this trickery, the devil attacked the castle in his rage and is said to have left his hoof prints on one of the rocks.
On the eastern wall of the church of Saint Pancras in the ancient monastery of Saint Augustine outside Canterbury is to be seen the imprint of the devil's talons as he was furious that his heathen temple had become a Christian place of worship.On a coping stone of the Devil's Bridge at Kirkby Lonsdale in Cumbria are the fingermarks of the devil left behind when in his fury at being tricked out of a soul.
So here you have the supposed "Devil" leaving his "Landing Zone"...which proves nothing at all, right?
But it is possible to prove ET origins. They can even determine if a meteorite is from a specific place like Mars.
They can prove that the "third" tit on a milk maiden means she's a witch weening an imp as well Trajanus. Whether they can "really" prove anything isn't the question here....they haven't and that is the point. The E.T. origins would have to be directly correlating to any and all physical proof, such as a dead body, a fossil, DNA, anything but landing zones, radar devices and the documentation of witnesses. These three variables do nothing to show unequivocal proof that an extraterrestrial is behind the craft.....an intelligent life form maybe......but where and how is still up for grabs and even then, we would be grasping at straws because we still wouldn't have the creator of the craft or any information as to it's origions, etc. Without this proof the so called evidence you have is nothing more than myth, just like my "religious" beliefs are nothing more than my own and many millions of other people's wishes, even though sightings of Jesus are said to be everywhere.....that miracles are done in his name everyday...etc.
Oh there's plenty of evidence, albeit not conclusive, as far as laymen know.
Nope. Sorry there really isn't. I have asked you many times to please provide the "plenty" of evidence you constantly allude to, but other than reported sightings, some photos and a landing spot or two, not one piece provides the guarantee or even the slightest amount of realistic disclosure as to "intelligent" extraterrestrial life.
Still, you can't compare the extent of evidence for ET with that for "demons" which aren't even a scientifically valid concept. There have been a myriad of sightings of strange flying craft, often with unusual beings. Countless sightings describe something technical, yet not of this earth in the sense of being far beyond our capabilities. Laymen may not have proof of ET but that's the overwhelming general impression.
Why can't I compare the extent of evidence for E.T. with Demons. Both have nothing by which to purport conclusive evidence for or against, both have a track record of sightings, direct physical involvement, yet neither has any conclusive physical evidence to back up the claims.
With Demons you have manifestation and pre and post aftereffects. A victim is possessed and the exorcist weeds them out.
With E.T. we have nothing but the good faith of the eyewitness to believe they ever abducted them in the first place.
With Demons we have ectoplasm, people thrown against walls, people speaking in strange and foreign tongues backwards, illicitng all sorts of historical information they couldn't be privy too, etc.
With E.T. we have nothing but the good faith of eyewitnesses as to what happened. This and people like Dr. Jacobs and his distance hypno'capades'.
Scientifically speaking, Demons might not be as easily classified in any tight little concept of dimensionality or physical domain, but the effects of their influence is directed and obvious. I cannot say the same for E.T. in this sense, as they (if real anyway) seem to stay as illusive as physically possible. Other than some metal pulled out of people and a perhaps a bad case of anal irritation, what else do you have?
Patience, patience.
The phenomenon has been intensified and widely known for over 6 decades. That may seem a long time--more than enough for many of us, myself included at times--to become exasperated for lack of any definitive resolution. Two points, though: First, the ETH shouldn't be singled out; "demons" haven't openly shown themselves either nor "time travelers." Second, intensification of the phenomenon relatively recently suggests the denoument of this whole thing is not far off, in terms of historical time. Not long ago, I encountered a book,
Revealed the Greatest UFO Secrets. It's just a POD book--no doubt in part because it's way too controversial for any trade publisher to touch. I was intrigued, though, by the way it spelled out exactly what requisite conditions must be met for disclosure and the circumstances under which it'll supposedly happen. From what I know of your orientation, you'd absolutely hate it, but it does seriously address the issue of when this interminable wait will finally end. It claims, though, that many of those who seek disclosure now wouldn't, if only they knew what it would lead to.
According to popular myth (and that is all any of this is) Demons do not know or care to know time as you and I in this physical plane know it to be. There is no sense of going into the past or future as we allow the concept as a guide. There have been cases of Demonic activity waiting years and years to fall prey upon a victim, and this for the sins of his father's father's father.....who knows what the Lord gave them when he allowed for the rule of this plane. I can state that fairness wasn't one of them, and by the way...God....Isn't good or evil. The reason why he sent his son to us is because we needed to be saved from God's wrath....just check out the old testament sometime to see the "myths" behind God's wrath.
Why would you state something like "I'd hate it" without knowing me on a personal basis for? You would be very surprised what I'd hate and what I'd like in this plane of existence. As I have stated many times on this forum, I would welcome E.T. with open arms if that is what is causing these many sightings, abductions etc. I wouldn't have a problem whatsoever with my "religious" feelings and that of an extraterrestrial intelligence. The Lord has already taught us that there are many planes of existence. That there were Monsters and creatures which roamed this world at one time. That there are spirits which continue to walk this world. That God created the HEAVENS and the earth....So who is to say he didn't create a myriad amount of different species of intelligence with vastly proportionate levels of conscious awareness.
But not the majority who have studied these things in depth.
Majority? I think you mean the minuscule minority who studied this subject; both of us included....and even though you might believe that E.T. has had this immense influence on us humans, I tend to believe the opposite. And continue to believe that what is happening to people is what I and many Christians call, "Demonic" in nature. The explanation might sound "Bronze" age of me, but I tend to be old fashioned anyway.....So we'll see some day.
---------- Post added at 10:46 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:40 AM ----------
I attack ideas not people. Another poster referred to me as "Traj-anus." When did I ever attack someone personally like that?
It was I who made the typo and placed the hyphen between your "Traz" and your "Anus"....LOL! I had since apologized. And exorcise I believe a great deal more humble than the constant bombardment of anti religious propaganda spewing forth from both yourself and Mike (who I called Mikey), even though the topics had nothing to do with thus in the slightest....Faith versus Factual Evidence, etc. etc.
But, we can only go to a fraction of those places where interest takes us. For that reason, I am afraid that there are few options but to form our views with a fraction of available knowledge, sometimes.
