• NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, 11 years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

Wikileaks and UFOs

Free episodes:

Status
Not open for further replies.
Good riddance to Saddam Hussein and the atrocities committed under his regime. Who can say if Iraq is better off now? If we ask the residents, they probably have their own opinions. If we ask the Coalition forces, they'll say the place is better off. In between one side and the other is the broad truth.

Regarding the WMDs, the UN Security Council found nothing. Hans Blix is on record saying there were no stockpiles. David Kelly said the same. Years later, no 'weapons of mass destruction' have been found. Not even in Syria.
 
Good riddance to Saddam Hussein and the atrocities committed under his regime. Who can say if Iraq is better off now? If we ask the residents, they probably have their own opinions. If we ask the Coalition forces, they'll say the place is better off. In between one side and the other is the broad truth.

Regarding the WMDs, the UN Security Council found nothing. Hans Blix is on record saying there were no stockpiles. David Kelly said the same. Years later, no 'weapons of mass destruction' have been found. Not even in Syria.

I for one never said he had them, just that prior to the war I thought he had them and so did everyone else. Now there are thousands and thousands of people claiming they knew all along there were no WMDs in Iraq. Bullshit. I think what happened is that Saddam tried to play an idiotic charade where he wanted his neighbors, like Iran, to believe he still had them for the purposes of intimidation. Meanwhile he was trying to abide the Americans and UN by getting rid of the stuff. He was walking a tightrope, trying to satisfy one while conning the other and in the end the cons ended up becoming the reality as far as the world was concerned. Just strikes me as boundlessly dumb that if he didn't have them that he wouldn't allow inspectors to come in to verify he didn't. Nope, wanted Iran to think he still might and inspections would have confirmed to them he didn't. Why in the hell would you care what Iran thinks when you've got a superpower breathing down your neck? Idiotic and he payed the ultimate price for his stupidity.
 
I for one never said he had them, just that prior to the war I thought he had them and so did everyone else. Now there are thousands and thousands of people claiming they knew all along there were no WMDs in Iraq. Bullshit. I think what happened is that Saddam tried to play an idiotic charade where he wanted his neighbors, like Iran, to believe he still had them for the purposes of intimidation. Meanwhile he was trying to abide the Americans and UN by getting rid of the stuff. He was walking a tightrope, trying to satisfy one while conning the other and in the end the cons ended up becoming the reality as far as the world was concerned. Just strikes me as boundlessly dumb that if he didn't have them that he wouldn't allow inspectors to come in to verify he didn't. Nope, wanted Iran to think he still might and inspections would have confirmed to them he didn't. Why in the hell would you care what Iran thinks when you've got a superpower breathing down your neck? Idiotic and he payed the ultimate price for his stupidity.
I think the US media seems to have done their brainwashing of the public very well!
The invasion of Iraq was a total scam. The US clearly manipulated intelligence data to prove their point in front of the UN saying that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction and was harboring Al-Qaeda terrorists. The evidence was so weak that only a handful of countries gathered around the US to support their attack (the UN never approved the subsequent invasion). These lies became clearer after the invasion and tragically so, with the total collapse of Iraq as a country. Saddam was a hateful dictator - no quibble about that. The fact is that his country actually had functional education and healthcare services and was investing in basic infrastructure (I know a few people who worked there building roads and tunnels). All that came to a halt after the 1991 war with the sanctions imposed on Iraq that directly affected the general population causing the death of, at least, 500 thousand children (some estimates even point to higher numbers).
In the end there were no WMD and the Al-Qaeda operatives actually found solace in Iraq after the US invasion, feeding on the infighting between shia and suni muslims and generating a horrible sequence of bomb attacks that killed more people in a couple of years than Saddam during his decades on power. It's all quite simple: the US went there to control the world's second largest oil fields. That move was more of a enterpreneurial decision than a political one. Halliburton was in heaven after the Iraq fights ended having the opportunity to explore the oil resources, work in the rebuilding and selling supplies to the soldiers on the field. This may seem quite heavy, specially for the US citizens who paid for the war with their taxes and often with the blood of their relatives (my sincere respects go to each and every one of those brave men and women who fought for their country, even doing it for reasons they never knew). Resources are becoming scarce and the big powers have to mark their territories carefuly. That's something that never changed throughout history. What worries me the most is that nowadays the geostrategical decisions don't come from the White House or the Kremlin, they come from the decision centers in colossal multinational companies that manage to manipulate the political power (after all who pays the circus-like electoral campaigns of the big parties). My friends, all I can say is beware!
 
I think the US media seems to have done their brainwashing of the public very well!
The invasion of Iraq was a total scam. The US clearly manipulated intelligence data to prove their point in front of the UN saying that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction and was harboring Al-Qaeda terrorists. The evidence was so weak that only a handful of countries gathered around the US to support their attack (the UN never approved the subsequent invasion). These lies became clearer after the invasion and tragically so, with the total collapse of Iraq as a country. Saddam was a hateful dictator - no quibble about that. The fact is that his country actually had functional education and healthcare services and was investing in basic infrastructure (I know a few people who worked there building roads and tunnels). All that came to a halt after the 1991 war with the sanctions imposed on Iraq that directly affected the general population causing the death of, at least, 500 thousand children (some estimates even point to higher numbers).
In the end there were no WMD and the Al-Qaeda operatives actually found solace in Iraq after the US invasion, feeding on the infighting between shia and suni muslims and generating a horrible sequence of bomb attacks that killed more people in a couple of years than Saddam during his decades on power. It's all quite simple: the US went there to control the world's second largest oil fields. That move was more of a enterpreneurial decision than a political one. Halliburton was in heaven after the Iraq fights ended having the opportunity to explore the oil resources, work in the rebuilding and selling supplies to the soldiers on the field. This may seem quite heavy, specially for the US citizens who paid for the war with their taxes and often with the blood of their relatives (my sincere respects go to each and every one of those brave men and women who fought for their country, even doing it for reasons they never knew). Resources are becoming scarce and the big powers have to mark their territories carefuly. That's something that never changed throughout history. What worries me the most is that nowadays the geostrategical decisions don't come from the White House or the Kremlin, they come from the decision centers in colossal multinational companies that manage to manipulate the political power (after all who pays the circus-like electoral campaigns of the big parties). My friends, all I can say is beware!

Oh brother, I read the first couple of sentences and that was enough for me to roll my eyes and stop reading. ALL of the intelligence agencies of the world thought Iraq had WMDs. No, they didn't all think we should go to war over it, but they all thought they were there. If you can't concede even that fact discussion is pointless.
 
Oh brother, I read the first couple of sentences and that was enough for me to roll my eyes and stop reading. ALL of the intelligence agencies of the world though Iraq had WMDs. No, they didn't all think we should go to war over it, but they all thought they were there. If you can't concede even that fact discussion is pointless.
We may have read different things on the subject, but if all intelligence agencies in the world knew that Iraq had WMDs do you really think that the US and Britain would be the only ones interested in an invasion? What most countries agreed upon was that continuous inspection from the IAEA was essential, more as an effort to prevent possible plans of creating nuclear weapons than out of fear that they actually had them yet. Colin Powel, the man behind the much publicized UN presentation of the "evidence" actually came forward in 2005 to confess his dismay at the poor quality and reliability of the intelligence material he was given. The US is, by far, the greatest military superpower in the world and it should have the best intelligence agencies too to avoid such blatant mistakes. How long will it be until a similar situation occurs?
 
We may have read different things on the subject, but if all intelligence agencies in the world knew that Iraq had WMDs do you really think that the US and Britain would be the only ones interested in an invasion? What most countries agreed upon was that continuous inspection from the IAEA was essential, more as an effort to prevent possible plans of creating nuclear weapons than out of fear that they actually had them yet. Colin Powel, the man behind the much publicized UN presentation of the "evidence" actually came forward in 2005 to confess his dismay at the poor quality and reliability of the intelligence material he was given. The US is, by far, the greatest military superpower in the world and it should have the best intelligence agencies too to avoid such blatant mistakes. How long will it be until a similar situation occurs?

Yes. But considering that no WMDs were found it appears that they were all wrong. If Iraq hadn't been so intent on fooling Iran they probably never would have thought that in the first place.

As far as intelligence goes...c'mon! These people aren't infallible. They make mistakes just like anyone else. Look at 9/11. That was preceded by one intelligence blunder after another, after another, after another...
 
As far as intelligence goes...c'mon! These people aren't infallible. They make mistakes just like anyone else. Look at 9/11. That was preceded by one intelligence blunder after another, after another, after another...
You're totally right. The quality of intelligence services has decayed in the past decades, specially due to excess confidence in technology. Drones and phone/internet communication interception are great, but the deterioration of field work with real spies on the spot means that many bases are left uncovered. Robert Baer's magnificent book "See no evil" is the sad chronicle of such decay in CIA's effectiveness, a factor that had and may still have tragic consequences both for the soldiers on the field of battle and the common citizen back at his home (9/11 will forever be a deep scar reminding that fact to the world).
 
You are right Wickerman, Saddam DID have WMD's, in fact he used them on his own people. He had at least chemical weapons and if you all recall (and I do) he was really fricken' close to Nukes back around 1980-81, well he was until the
Israelis blew it to hell with air strikes. You didn't hear much about this during the time, but American Intelligence and others believed that Saddam may have shipped his stuff to Syria when the U.S. invaded. And something else about this son uv a bitch, Saddam. If you recall, he had his intelligence agency attempt to assassinate former President George Bush (Sr.) when Bill Clinton was sitting in the White House. He pissed all over UN Resolutions, he continully fired upon U.S. and Allied aircraft, he violated the "no fly zone" and kicked out UN Inspectors. Screw him! He asked for it .. he got it and at the time a whole lot of people were in favor of booting this mass killer out. Bush Senior screwed the pooch back in 1991 when we could have done it then.

As far as weapons of mass destruction, if nothing else he had massive amounts of chemical weapons. Ask Iran how many of theirs died during the Iran/Iraq war in the 80's. Ask the Iraqi Kurds how many of theirs died when Saddam gassed them. I am sick and tired of hearing this BS that Bush lied-people died cause Saddam didn't have WMD's. Bullshit.

Decker

Hi Don. Actually it not as simple as that. Yes Saddam was at the time head of the Iraqi Army, when those 5,OOO Kurds died at Halabja. But over the years since that happened the reporting of this event has been tainted rather extensively. Very important, and critical facts, have been left out over the years, since this tragedy unfolded. Western media and governments who wanted to have regime-change in Iraq used this event to justify a 'New War', that eventually took place after the second 'BUSH' came to power. Here some of the real facts, that you don't often hear about much in the west!

There was an actual battle occurring at that very location between Iranian and Iraqi forces, the day all this happened. It is well-documented by independent sources that both sides used chemical weapons that day! Iranian forces had occupied the town and occupied places outside the town, the Iraqi forces were trying to capture the town and drive out the Iranians.

It has been well-documented Iraq was supplied chemical weapons by the United States during the Iran and Iraq war ( Iraq was an ally at that time) Now here were it gets very murky, the gassing happened during a heated firing exchange between each side, the gas was fired in and around the location of were the town happened to be, and many independent sources and journalists, who were there later reported that the gas was fired not to kill the Kurds, but was actually used in a desperate attempt to kill each others soldiers, unfortunately the Kurds who were living there at the time were caught up in it all!

Don, It also well documented it was Cyanide based gas that killed these unfortunate people. It also well-documented Iraq was using mustard gas an agent that was used during World War 1, which killed many soldiers during the war that started in 1914 and ended in 1918

This agent is fairly easy to make and come by, it something a local lab with very little funding could easily mass produce. The fact is, Iraq never used a Cyanide-gas on that day the Iranians did, but it wasn't a deliberate act, the Kurds just found themselves in the middle of battle, were life had no value.

Also, what Iraq was building was a power-station allegedly just for Nuclear power. On this occasion I believe the Israelis were right to bomb it, Saddam had a taste for war, he started two wars one with Iran supported by the United States and the other one with Kuwait. I think most rational-thinking people are in agreement he would have tried to build the N- bomb eventually. It was claimed Saddam was 1 to 2 years out from building a Nuclear weapon-or device. Like I said he was a leader who a taste for conquest so I have no argument against the actions taken on this occasion.

Don, it more than likely than not, he had got rid of everything he had after the first-Gulf war (10 years prior to the new Gulf war) and the stuff that he had was supplied from other states and countries. We have to be honest, United states has to accept a certain responsibility for supplying this mad-man with the chemical weapons and biological weapons, that he had in the 80's.

Actually, Saddam was agreeing to all UN Inspections been in Iraq, in the years before the war began and started, and Chief inspector Hans Blix pretty much said before and after the war ended. There was no reason to go to war on the belief he had WMD, it well-established now both Great Britain and the United States, have lied to the American public and the World. While i am perfectly happy Saddam is gone and good-riddance, yet but if we are going to have Superpowers fighting wars, well at least be honest, to why you have sent troops there to fight for you!

People all you need to research is the shame of a meeting that took place at the UN were Colin Powell ( A guy who has completely dropped from the political scene since the war ended) presented evidence that pretty much has been debunked since then, the evidence presented back then, is now presently considered by lot of foreign pundits to have been information that was nonsense.

Don, Bush and Cheney and the rest of the bunch are evil little shit heads. Sorry I like you Don, this is not a tirade against you, well your fully entitled to your views, but when it comes to this Neo-Cons Scumbags, I have no time for them. They are rat-bastards pardon my language young brave men who are only at the start of life, women also, have been injured and killed on the belief there doing it to protect their country, it's a lie plain and simple.

Bush skipped the draft himself did he not Don, during the Vietnam-war period? His daddy stepped in for him, he is a coward, most of them are Don. The true heroes are the people dieing over there in the Middle east both sides and the people standing up against the lie used to justify these wars.

It time to wake up, the elite have always used the ordinary joe-soap to do the evil deeds, that they'll never do themselves. I think we need to radically change the system, we have now, our we be forever manipulated by our so-called masters and leaders, it will be to the detriment of future generations if we don't.
 
You are right Wickerman, Saddam DID have WMD's, in fact he used them on his own people. He had at least chemical weapons and if you all recall (and I do) he was really fricken' close to Nukes back around 1980-81, well he was until the Israelis blew it to hell with air strikes. You didn't hear much about this during the time, but American Intelligence and others believed that Saddam may have shipped his stuff to Syria when the U.S. invaded. And something else about this son uv a bitch, Saddam. If you recall, he had his intelligence agency attempt to assassinate former President George Bush (Sr.) when Bill Clinton was sitting in the White House. He pissed all over UN Resolutions, he continully fired upon U.S. and Allied aircraft, he violated the "no fly zone" and kicked out UN Inspectors. Screw him! He asked for it .. he got it and at the time a whole lot of people were in favor of booting this mass killer out. Bush Senior screwed the pooch back in 1991 when we could have done it then. As far as weapons of mass destruction, if nothing else he had massive amounts of chemical weapons. Ask Iran how many of theirs died during the Iran/Iraq war in the 80's. Ask the Iraqi Kurds how many of theirs died when Saddam gassed them. I am sick and tired of hearing this BS that Bush lied-people died cause Saddam didn't have WMD's. Bullshit. Decker

To bring this full circle, recent leaked cables show that Saddam did indeed have chemical WMD, and they continued to be found as recent as 2008. Wikileaks: WMD program existed in Iraq prior to US invasion - National public safety | Examiner.com

Think what you will about Assange, but to me this shows the value of organizations such as wikileaks to bring a bit of transparency to things.Whatever happened to the days when we assumed that all politicians were lying, maneuvering scumbags?
 
I urge people not to tie wikileaks just to Assange..there are loads of other people there, every 'idea or product' needs a face these days, they gave it one.
 
I urge people not to tie wikileaks just to Assange..there are loads of other people there, every 'idea or product' needs a face these days, they gave it one.

Really the credit/blame goes to the whistleblowers themselves. All organizations such as Wikileaks are doing is acting as publishers. If media organizations the world over were doing their job, there would be less of a need for it.
 
To bring this full circle, recent leaked cables show that Saddam did indeed have chemical WMD, and they continued to be found as recent as 2008. Wikileaks: WMD program existed in Iraq prior to US invasion - National public safety | Examiner.com

Think what you will about Assange, but to me this shows the value of organizations such as wikileaks to bring a bit of transparency to things.Whatever happened to the days when we assumed that all politicians were lying, maneuvering scumbags?

Oh God no the Examiner! You should really go and check the information in that before accepting it as legitimate piece of journalism! Afterall, this the very same paper or website, that prints all does bogus UFO stories, and gives people like Alfred weber, Michael Salla, a platform to spew their nonsense that has poisoned the pool of UFO study!

If these documents exist, Saddam had Chemical weapons in Iraq at the time of the invasion, please post them here with a legitimate sources accompanying it!

I am very careful, I know I can back up what I said happened at Halabja in 1988, as the sources are legitimate ones! and if required I can post them here for everyone to read.

I don't doubt Iraq had one time had mustard gas, as it was used in the battle for Halabja, but it fairly obvious now, there was no no WMD in Iraq for least two years or more before the invasion! The Examiner is talking about US troops finding chemical weapons after Saddam and his regime and long since been annexed, so you need to put it into preceptive, if something was found it was most likely something being created by Dissidents who were fighting against the occupation of Iraq by foreign troops or by Al qaeda who came to Iraq after the actual battle for Baghdad had ended. This find is alleged to have happened in 2008 how many years after the war is that exactly! Do you see my point?
 
Yeah, these evil vile dictators, for shame. They shoot young girls on college campuses, let black American Airman die of STDs for experiments, they purposefully unleash the deadliest environmental disasters in US history so they can kick everyone out of NewOrleans and Luisiana for Haliburton, they allow anthrax to attack Leftist politicians and expendable tabloid journalists, they allow civillian-filled airliners to create the most traumatizing images of apocalyptic world-ending scenarios that I still can't get out of my head sometimes in the middle of the night, they assign execution for a popular young US President, they give billions in aid to Big Bankster gangsters while families go homeless,....................
 
I watched this video today, It's a new documentary made about Wikileaks and Julian, please take a hour out of your day to watch it! It quiet revealing, and I totally get the mission of Wikileaks, more so now than I had before! There is a video shown of an atrocity committed by American soldiers, that is so heinous, that is made me very angry watching it! I know lot of people on here are American, but if my country was committing these acts in my name, I will feel the exact same why as I do at this moment.

http://goo.gl/WzPtP
 
Oh God no the Examiner! You should really go and check the information in that before accepting it as legitimate piece of journalism! Afterall, this the very same paper or website, that prints all does bogus UFO stories, and gives people like Alfred weber, Michael Salla, a platform to spew their nonsense that has poisoned the pool of UFO study!

If these documents exist, Saddam had Chemical weapons in Iraq at the time of the invasion, please post them here with a legitimate sources accompanying it!

I am very careful, I know I can back up what I said happened at Halabja in 1988, as the sources are legitimate ones! and if required I can post them here for everyone to read.

I don't doubt Iraq had one time had mustard gas, as it was used in the battle for Halabja, but it fairly obvious now, there was no no WMD in Iraq for least two years or more before the invasion! The Examiner is talking about US troops finding chemical weapons after Saddam and his regime and long since been annexed, so you need to put it into preceptive, if something was found it was most likely something being created by Dissidents who were fighting against the occupation of Iraq by foreign troops or by Al qaeda who came to Iraq after the actual battle for Baghdad had ended. This find is alleged to have happened in 2008 how many years after the war is that exactly! Do you see my point?

You're completely right. My bad! Definitely should have been more careful.

WikiLeaks Show WMD Hunt Continued in Iraq With Surprising Results | Danger Room | Wired.com Is a far better article. It links to the wikileaks sources, but I'm not sure if they will all still work with wikileaks current server issues. (these leaks are not from the recent cablegate either.).

They didn't find anything earth-shattering, or anything that would justify an invasion outright. And indeed they did attribute the 2008 find to most likely being Al Qaeda. I'm the last person to defend Bush, but I don't think the matter is as simple as 'Bush lied, people died' as Don was getting at.
 
Check it out,

This cable refers to the 9/11 attacks as bombings.

We all know there were no bombs on 9/11 - the TV even said so, but this cable references a bombing. And I'm pretty sure you can go to any big forum and say there were bombs on 9/11 and be attacked for saying it. But here it is in the cables:

Wikileaks - CableGate

(SBU) Judge Garzon is considered a critical threat
profile Judge due to his on-going oversight and involvement
in highly-visible terrorism cases including the September 11,
2001 Trade Tower bombings
as connected to the Moroccan
Al-Qaida cell known as the Barakat Yarkas group.

"the September 11, 2001 Trade Tower bombings"


.... make of it what you will.
 
Yeah, these evil vile dictators, for shame. They shoot young girls on college campuses, let black American Airman die of STDs for experiments, they purposefully unleash the deadliest environmental disasters in US history so they can kick everyone out of NewOrleans and Luisiana for Haliburton, they allow anthrax to attack Leftist politicians and expendable tabloid journalists, they allow civillian-filled airliners to create the most traumatizing images of apocalyptic world-ending scenarios that I still can't get out of my head sometimes in the middle of the night, they assign execution for a popular young US President, they give billions in aid to Big Bankster gangsters while families go homeless,....................

What country would do something like that? Oh, I get it......nevermind. Great post and very nicely written.

---------- Post added at 01:30 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:25 PM ----------

I watched this video today, It's a new documentary made about Wikileaks and Julian, please take a hour out of your day to watch it! It quiet revealing, and I totally get the mission of Wikileaks, more so now than I had before! There is a video shown of an atrocity committed by American soldiers, that is so heinous, that is made me very angry watching it! I know lot of people on here are American, but if my country was committing these acts in my name, I will feel the exact same why as I do at this moment.

http://goo.gl/WzPtP

I feel the same way. I saw a clip of US troops in Iraq throwing puppies off a bridge and beating kids. I know not all troops are dicks and "war is hell" but thats just wrong. Go and defend our freedom and I will support you one hundred percent but have some class for God's sake.
 


---------- Post added at 01:30 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:25 PM ----------



I feel the same way. I saw a clip of US troops in Iraq throwing puppies off a bridge and beating kids. I know not all troops are dicks and "war is hell" but thats just wrong. Go and defend our freedom and I will support you one hundred percent but have some class for God's sake.

I personally am of the believe, what we see is not how it is! I think the last time America had true freedom and showed it to the world was in the fifties and early sixties, in my opinion, American has adopted policies and I am sorry if this will offend people here, that Nazis would have been proud of! The only country that is constantly at war is the United States, please name another country who has been a war so much since 1945 then America, it almost like America has become the fourth Reich.
 
I personally am of the believe, what we see is not how it is! I think the last time America had true freedom and showed it to the world was in the fifties and early sixties, in my opinion, American has adopted policies and I am sorry if this will offend people here, that Nazis would have been proud of! The only country that is constantly at war is the United States, please name another country who has been a war so much since 1945 then America, it almost like America has become the fourth Reich.

I agree 100 percent. Our country is headed for some really bad shit and I think its too late to do anything about it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top