Seconded strongly!
An absolute pet hate of mine is when people - usually New Age types - use terms such as 'Frequencies' or 'Vibrations' without ever referring to what is actually supposed to be vibrating or oscillating. 'Raising vibrations' is meaningless. A frequency is just the numerical rate at which something is oscillating or switching states etc. You can increase the frequency of an EM wave or increase the rate at which a sewing machine needle goes in and out of the material being sewed but you cannot just talk about vibrations and frequencies without saying what it is that is supposed to be vibrating.
I realise that people are entitled to borrow terms from science and use them in different ways, but the argument stands that when anyone - usually from Sedona
- talks about raising one's vibrations it is still meaningless without explaining what part of a human being it is that vibrates! Whether I agree or not personally, I'd be far less annoyed if it was explained that, for example, it is someone's 'aura' that is increasing in frequency etc.
Does this make sense? Does it annoy anyone else other than Marduk, who obviously gets it?