Yes Drew, let's rely on YouTube comments. A bastion of truth on the internet.I still haven't seen comments on the videos that pixelsmith posted. I watched the videos you posted but I also read the youtube comments which tear the videos to pieces. Free fall collapse speed isn't explained by the pancake model for the two towers. To say that one tower fell later because it had fewer stories above the burning area does not address the free fall speed for both the towers collapsing. The freefall speed is also the case for tower 7 -- a point ignored by the video.
So again I'm waiting for some criticism of pixelsmith's videos -- until then this is a slam dunk case for controlled demolition. To just defer to "official" is not an argument -- that's not presenting any evidence. Even worse "official" means it should be held up to even more scrutiny considering the previous falsehoods of the "official" positions that have led to the U.S. attacking other countries -- whether it's via the CIA or proxy forces or secret bombings, etc.
Official -- it reminds me of when I was confronting vice president Al Gore in the basement of the VFW in 2000 -- I said "everyone knows the CIA controls the drug trade." Obviously I wasn't presenting the official story but there's so much evidence that this is the case that my statement was not outlandish.
So, let me get this straight - Terrorists crashed planes into the buildings and then someone inside the US government pushed the button to demolish the towers and tower 7, along with a church and a few other buildings. Also, they killed everyone on board a flight that crashed in a field, and they also crashed another plane into the Pentagon, but that wasn't really a plane, it was a missile and all those people on that plane just disappeared?
That's the story you're trying to convince me of, in a nutshell, right?
As Trained Observer has said, arguing this stuff is ridiculous - we need to understand the WHY of it. Why would the American government go through all this and murder thousands of its citizens? Why crash planes AND use explosives, and then not blame the explosives on the terrorists? If the explosives were so easy to see, why not blame it on the terrorists?
Right now, I find that there's a lot of science that shows the buildings could have collapsed without the help of explosives, but I could be wrong because my expertise is in a different field. There's a lot of speculation in the videos posted by Pixelsmith, but they are interesting. Those people aren't just college film students like the Loose Change people. Those are actual scientists, some talking outside of their field, some not - it's interesting, but it doesn't mean it's what happened that day.