• NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

are vaccines safe?


are vaccines safe?


  • Total voters
    17
  • Poll closed .
How do you sleep at night being part of this global scam ?

Between 1990 and 2001, over 10,000 people fell ill due to foods contaminated with pathogens like E. coli, and many have organic foods to blame. That's because organic foods tend to have higher levels of potential pathogens. One study, for example, found E. coli in produce from almost 10% of organic farms samples, but only 2% of conventional ones10. The same study also found Salmonella only in samples from organic farms.

Just recently, an independent research project in the UK systematically reviewed the 162 articles on organic versus non-organic crops published in peer-reviewed journals between 1958 and 2008 11. These contained a total of 3558 comparisons of content of nutrients and other substances in organically and conventionally produced foods. They found absolutely no evidence for any differences in content of over 15 different nutrients including vitamin C, ?-carotene, and calcium. There were some differences, though; conventional crops had higher nitrogen levels, while organic ones had higher phosphorus and acidity - none of which factor in much to nutritional quality. Further analysis of similar studies on livestock products like meat, dairy, and eggs also found few differences in nutritional content. Organic foods did, however, have higher levels of overall fats, particularly trans fats. So if anything, the organic livestock products were found to be worse for us

Right now, roughly 800 million people suffer from hunger and malnutrition, and about 16 million of those will die from it17. If we were to switch to entirely organic farming, the number of people suffering would jump by 1.3 billion, assuming we use the same amount of land that we're using now. Unfortunately, what's far more likely is that switches to organic farming will result in the creation of new farms via the destruction of currently untouched habitats, thus plowing over the little wild habitat left for many threatened and endangered species.

Mythbusting 101: Organic Farming > Conventional Agriculture
 
The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. The program, created on Oct. 1, 1988, was set up to help compensate victims found to be injured by certain vaccines.

The program is funded by a $0.75 excise tax on vaccines recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for routine administration to children, according to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

According to Health and Human Services, 3,887 compensation awards have been paid since the first claims were filed in 1989. Another 9,860 claims were dismissed.
A total of 633 petitions were filed seeking payment in fiscal year 2014. Petitions peaked in fiscal year 2003 when 2,592 claims were filed.

This data is far from perfect. But what it shows is that in the last 25 years, the fund has paid out claims to 3,887 people -- which translates to an average of 155 paid claims per year.

So between 1990 and 2001, over 10,000 people fell ill due to pathogens in organic food.
Yet in 25 years only 3,887 people had their claims of injury re vaccines upheld.

The math is simple enough as the conclusion is too.

Organic food makes more people sick than vaccines.

And this doesn't factor in the millions of lives saved by the vaccines, or the billions who would suffer if we switched to organic farming on a large scale.
Or the destruction of habitats and endangered species that would also result.

You are on the wrong side of the facts and history here Pixel
 

Before you post a link to an article that talks about a study, you should make sure the study is an actual peer reviewed scientific paper. The one that is referred to in the article isn't - it's published on MedCrave which has been listed on watchdog groups as predatory publisher (Beall’s List of Predatory Publishers) - essentially, you pay to publish and it is "peer reviewed" by the people you pay. So essentially, anyone can say anything and publish.
I realize this doesn't not change the opinions of those that read sites that publish garbage like this. That's fine - I'm just stating the facts.
 
Before you post a link to an article that talks about a study, you should make sure the study is an actual peer reviewed scientific paper. The one that is referred to in the article isn't - it's published on MedCrave which has been listed on watchdog groups as predatory publisher (Beall’s List of Predatory Publishers) - essentially, you pay to publish and it is "peer reviewed" by the people you pay. So essentially, anyone can say anything and publish.
I realize this doesn't not change the opinions of those that read sites that publish garbage like this. That's fine - I'm just stating the facts.

Go to pubmed and read the same stuff.
You don't state facts. You regurgitate talking points.
 
Angelo since Mike is unable to collect on the Mercury challenge why don't you collect it?
Gene I know you can use $100,000.00 why don't you collect it?
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. announces the World Mercury Project’s $100,000 challenge with goal of stopping use of highly toxic mercury in vaccines • World Mercury Project

"The WMP will pay $100,000 to the first journalist, or other individual, who can find a peer-reviewed scientific study demonstrating that thimerosal is safe in the amounts contained in vaccines currently being administered to American children and pregnant women."

Go for it people! What are you waiting for?!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Arguing with an irrational person is pointless.
Rationality would shatter their delusional self image. It triggers an immune response and get rejected even if it kills the host.
 
Back
Top