Search results

Has anyone seen the extended DVD edition? I was impressed by the film. All that occurred in the shadows from Dulce to Serpo is almost as fascinating as the UFO mystery itself. I was wondering if the additional footage is worth seeing. Thanks.

Great idea! Thank you, Todd

Hi- First off, I have been listening to the Paracast since the beginning and love what Gene, David and the co-hosts have done. That said, I have to confess that I am not a fan of the forum updates that appear in the Paracast's Twitter feed. I started following right after Gene announced that...

This is horrible news. Rest in peace Mac, you were one of a kind and proof that the open-minded intellect is invaluable, but sadly too rare and too brief in this world. I'm sorry that the Paracast will have another tribute show but it is most deserved. And Gene & David, thank you for...

Thanks for posting this. I was wondering what happened. I half thought that Dolan went back and revised it after his last Paracast appearance.:D Foreword by LMH?!?

Yes, there are a lot of things regarding MJ12 that should be put to bed. Have any researchers moved beyond the debate of the MJ12 content itself and delved into the origin of the MJ12 papers? It would be interesting to hear more from them. Granted, it's an obvious digression from the main...

I think that this is a great idea to get listeners and forum members to support a Paracast research trip. I'd gladly donate. -todd

I just finished listening to this episode... and it is not at all what I expected. After hearing David speak about the discussion he'd had with Bassett at the Culture of Contact, I was hoping for some sort of continuation along the level of rapport that I had assumed developed out of said...

I love the new UFO Mag ad with Birnes & Vaeni. Seriously!

I'm listening to the latest episode (11/09/08) and it sounds like you could easily play version of the Kevin Bacon game with Corso with respect to any event in 20th century history.

I enjoyed the show and wanted to say thank you for it. You two did what you do best and asked the tough questions and exposed her for what she is.

While it was a network show with some obvious flaws, I have to say that I was very surprised at it's treatment of Project Blue Book. The segment said that it was created to downplay and debunk the phenomenon after the large number of sightings from 1947-1952. It did not go much further into it...

Has anyone tried the Think Drink? I tried to get some at the one store in the Baltimore area that carries it, but he was out. I'm going to see if it makes my grades improve. -todd

How about another episode with Ryan Wood?

I'd like to know why, in 2008, she feels necessary to announce her site as "www. ..." I don't know what browser she uses, but you don't have to type those w's in anymore. Picky I know, but it annoys me nonetheless.

I think Gene and David should charge Spencer for the publishing tips that they freely gave him over the course of the interview. -todd

I don't care for the tone of the article either, nor for David Clarke's "logic." Here's a quote from Nick Pope's site regarding the MoD release: "These files don't prove we've been visited by aliens. Most UFOs can be explained as misidentifications of aircraft lights, satellites, meteors...

Well, with that many clear photos someone should be able to identify it soon. -t

This is all from Sunday night's Dateline featuring 10 UFO cases with photo/video evidence. Overall I think it was covered and presented fairly, much like more and more of the recent coverage. -t.

Well on one hand you have to hand it to the government. The Robertson Panel and Blue Book left everything wide open for this quagmire to snowball into what it is today. -t.