Kieran
Paranormal Adept
@Kieran
You may be right but wouldn't you really rather be able to say that I was wrong? If someone showed me that the facts behind one of my beliefs was flawed, I wouldn't care if they were close-minded or open minded or what. Wrong is wrong.
I do approach this stuff thinking that the chances of finding something truly paranormal are very low, almost non-existent.
Do you really think that if I saw evidence for something that was unmistakably paranormal, that I would turn away and deny it?
All I can say is that you don't know me.
Lance
I will accept you need to see established evidence, before believing in it. Yet please don't be so hypocritical of the all the informational UFO evidence, there is out there on the internet, some of this information, does prove some UFO experiences are real, and some individuals across the world, are being effected by their unique UFO experiences.
Every person who've gone and reported seeing UFO's can't be classed as being simpleton's liars and fools, this is were your argument, fails to impress. How many UFO cases still today, have yet to be explained, by believers, skeptics, cynics or debunker's? We all have opinions Lance, each side does, believer and nonbeliever, but nobody can claim with a straight face, in my opinion, something is not going on here. I do understand, your have right to ask for prove that these objects, would be a sign, that this planet is been visited by nonhuman's, i accept again your right to challenge thoses claim by the UFO believer, but you need to accept this first.
The UFO community can't positively ever prove to you the nonbeliever, any of this is really happening, we can sway your opinion however with evidence got from a number of reputable sources, some of the evidence would be in the form of official documentation which does show military briefings and discussions have taken place, were the subject of UFO'S was discussed, at the highest level. The judgments, assessments, reports and letters that were circulated, after the ending of these high level discussions, do convey a plain message, that Military sources across the world, not just the United States Military, took the subject of UFO's very seriously believed it is was real, not fictitious, but it wasn't a subject that threated national security.So we have people in high positions, some of whom protect the security of countries, are confirming the phenomenon is real it happening, so up to you to make what you will of that analysis by them, we also have civilian accounts, many radar returns of UFO'S, many pilots observing these objects, photographic evidence and some video and so on.
This evidence a least suggests a real phenomenon is there, you have choosen to dismiss this type of evidence, which to me doesn't make lot of sense. I think your wrong to do so. Put this way would you dismiss photographic evidence of something taking place in a photograph, from 1950's say? This photograph is showing a man walking by the beach with his dog. I think your answer would be no, now if that same picture had the same man walking with his dog on the beach, but this time ok there was a unmistakable saucer UFO in the picture, I like to hear your terrestrial explanation for that, but of course you can claim hoax, but the further back you go, the harder it will be for you, to easily dismiss the photographic evidence there is for UFO's..
I would find it so nauseating debating about the subject of UFO's, if i truly did not believe in it. It one of the reasons why i will never get people like you, Lance, i get your arguments, but call me Irish, i think there is something wrong with people like you, when you come here to post everyday mind already made up, but will debate still everyday about this crazy subject, odd behavior in least from were I am looking. Your not stupid, but there is obviously a personality need to discuss this subject, my line of thinking finds that extremely odd.