David , when you call me ignorant , you've just picked a real fight .
You can pretend that you're a big deal with your little internet radio show . It's internet , not real radio , and the computer screen is not a T.V.
The "big time for little people" .
As a host , you take the stance of attacker , which in any format is a conflict of interest ; putting your own opinions in before anyone else's . Your listeners are the ones who should be doing the judging , with you as the neutral reporter moderating the information . Who do you think you are , Howard Stern ?
Amateurs like yourself , who can't control your own prejudices and emotions find themselves kicking their own guests , with the herd that follows them shouting for more .
Oh, and by the way , " Michael Horn is guily by association" is what you wrote in another post here on this forum ; so maybe you would be so kind as to explain what the hell "guily" means . Since you picked on my own typo before , explain away , genius .
Desperation for leverage , is your motive for that one .
When you make the personal choice of ridiculing me , a guest of your forum , you commit yourself to being the willing recipient of resourcefullness , time , opportunity , and irony .
So , congratulations for helping the Meier case along ; it is of the utmost importance that the great mass of people don't get convinced about this case too soon , and the intended "soft spots ' in the evidence target those people who prefer to pass on the positive evidence and take the low road as you all are doing here .
The rest of the people who find it still untriguing will detect it by their own intelligence , despite your own shortsightedness . So look further , people , than this public stoning .
Too right !