Forum Super Hero
So would I. I'm working on it.
SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY A PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+! For a low subscription fee, you will receive access to an ad-free version of The Paracast, the exclusive After The Paracast podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, plus show transcripts, the new Paracast+ Video Channel, Classic Episodes and Special Features categories! We now offer lifetime memberships! You can subscribe via this direct link:
Will hearing more he said vs somebody else said add anything to the debate?I think it would be interesting to have Peter Robbins on to hear in detail the problems he now has with Larry Warren's account of the Rendlesham Forest incident.
It would also be good to understand if his thoughts on Nick Pope's book have changed as a result.
I also think he's a compelling listen on all aspects of the UFO mystery and so called "abduction" phenomenon.
I doubt it, whether you're referring to the Rendelsham debate or the UFO debate as a whole. But I'd like to hear Gene interview Robbins to clear up which parts of Warren's testimony he now rejects and which he continues to support.Will hearing more he said vs somebody else said add anything to the debate?
They are a research repository.Does this individual or his organization state the reasons for doing this?
That's the plan. I'm working on scheduling with Peter.I doubt it, whether you're referring to the Rendelsham debate or the UFO debate as a whole. But I'd like to hear Gene interview Robbins to clear up which parts of Warren's testimony he now rejects and which he continues to support.
That's a fair comment. I'd like to hear his thoughts on Peter Robbins' criticisms of his book if indeed they still stand.Hey I like Pope but I think he's added very little to our understanding of the event. Aside from documenting it in his book.
We could go straight to the Horse's....Mouth, i meant to say mouth and ask this one
Thanks, Han but can you say a 'cold day in Hell'?
Yes, that appears to be true.I have realised that it is hard for me to argue against something I don't understand.
You must know something, or be convinced of something, that I am not. Or vice versa.
It is the default position of most everyone I know and few are brave enough to find out for themselves.I guess what I am trying to say is that my default reaction to 'channeling' etc is one of scepticism.
But one thing I know is that if you don't look you can't see, or maybe in this case, you can't hear unless you listen
No worries, you were doing what you did for a reason. We both can learn from it.What you believe or don't is no skin off my nose, and I realise I have not always been polite to you.
I have done all the podcasts that I desire and have no inspiration to do another. At this moment.I think part of the reason for that was born of frustration on my part, because like I said I don't understand where you are coming from.
And I know very little about ET channeling because I invariably avoid the topic entirely (except this time of course )
Rather than me putting beliefs on you, I would rather hear what you actually think. That is why I made the suggestion.
I think it took great bravery for you to write this, I am not the Most Wonderful Poster by acclaim around these parts. So I have a present for you (and the forum).But I also respect that you don't want to, so that is fine. Best wishes.
No......You mean Kate Middleton isn't a reptilian hybrid ?I guess what I am trying to say is that my default reaction to 'channeling' etc is one of scepticism.