To even equate me to Kal Korff goes far beyond the pale.
I'm sorry. You're right. I was trying to be gentle and not point out the differences in such an obvious manner. Kal Korff actually did some research, came to conclusions, cited his references, wrote a book, and published it. There is no question you're not in the same category. Korff, for the record, also did some fine research exposing Billy Meier.
You, on the other hand, after a strange meeting with a disappearing character, have come to some sort of an epiphany regarding Roswell and loudly proclaimed your opinion that it is fraudulent, dismissing all evidence from whatever source without any proof whatsoever, and actually, amazingly, mind-bogglingly, called the 1897 Aurora, Texas a superior case.
To those of us who have known and even admired your many posts over the last two years or so, this sounds like a sudden religious conversion. The Disinformation Agents made a convert. Don't misunderstand my point
I think there is a case to be made in what you are saying, but you're not making it. By any objective measurement, Korff did a better job. I know full well that Korff stepped off the insanity cliff a few years ago, but not before doing some good work. Who knows what happened to him. Maybe he was neuralized.
You can run around, scream and shout with your hands waving in the air saying "This is all bull shit! This is all bull shit!" all you want, of course. But how does that contribute substantively to the discussion? It;s been said before. It reminds me of Phil Klass: "It's all plasma! It's all plasma!" I have a lot more faith in the well-reasoned, calm, and even phlegmatic words of Marcel, Jr. describing what he personally saw and examined than I do strident, but empty denials.
What I have noticed (and this goes beyond today's discussion) is that naysayers for Roswell and other incidents, when they cannot dismiss the evidence, however anecdotal, that is provided, will go after the person instead of the incident. We have ample testimony from experiencers here what has happened to them. They are the subject of character assassination. Anything they ever said that was the least bit wrong is brought forth as 'evidence' that they are lying. Marcel, Sr., for example, exaggerated his war record, THEREFORE, we say, he lied about Roswell. Glen Dennis, in a misguided attempt to protect someone he cared for, didn't give her real name, THEREFORE everything else he said about Roswell is completely dismissed.
I guarantee you if Marcel, Jr. had yelled at his neighbor to get off the lawn in 1962, we'd all know about it. We'd have the tearful neighbor's testimony that it ruined her life and it would be corraborated by the neigborhood's golden retriever, as stalwart a witness as there ever was. And THEREFORE we'd know, without a doubt, that Marcell, Jr.'s testimony was suspicious, at best, and he probably lied.