Recent content by Drew UK

And to distill further into the truth - the florence-firenze dynastic family (Medici) finance bankrolled the renaissance artistry and also the power adventure into the roman catholic church. Religion on its own did not oblige the arts.

I didn't get it. Did you? No scrutiny, no evaluation , no analysis. Just some folks talking film - paranormal?, maybe I missed it - maybe I needed someone to try to find the audience and bring it back to a focal point. Irreplaceable talent? The ball is in your court. No points for throwing...

I wouldn't make that connection - if you need to make a reference to the speculative beings it sort of contradicts the water environment - being upright on bipeds would be structurally more suited to land based, pods on fingers (no humour intended) - would only function providing there was...

First, I need to be sure that time actually exists. How can we measure it? - we can only measure motion, and it is from this we have made an illusion error. The meaning of time, remains problematic for me in contempory physics. I think physics needs to find a new definition and replace the...

I don't understand how this graph reinforces the argument - the gradient "rate of change" is advancing throughout the 1800's - it is not linear? Draw a tangent to the line at 1850 and 1950 - there is a difference, is there not? Beware of promoting CO2 as a sole paramater for climate change in...

As always, I am not the ideal student for Quantum stuff - I try to keep a cautious approach on some of the quantum fizz ideas. Could this question be answered more cheaply? The Uncertainty Principle Is Untenable

I remain convinced that most of these events are independently driven by the witness. However, I also think that there are clues left behind in the case of a real event in a minority of cases. You mentioned that the CD was on repeat - was this intentioned or conincidental or unusual? There...

But to expect "something" to come along, is not the most rational of answers. In fact, it underlines the basis of religion of which you try to contradict. Keep going. Lets talk science and mathematics.

Expand on a new secular ideology, that is able to resolve the question. Else, a substitution is quite correctly degenerate - a paradox.

It's worse, the magpies didn't get duped with paper rectangles like we did!! We associate value, with desirability - not with its application or requirement. Gold, is a luxury commodity - its appealing to look at, and not easily tarnished, most corrosive resistant and predominantly in scarce...

Keep going, what will that be? Pure, applied scientific doctrine? Or a more normative guided principle which includes a bit of creativeness. You can extinguish religion if you like, but you must be prepared to put something in its place - "a bit like mercury in your previous assertion"...

Obviously the witness that drew this wasn't using a set square and compass at the time - and how the image as been polluted/embossed over the years increases the error of representation so the question needs to be reflected back on them. The rest of the symbols, in particular the top section -...

The equation has no real solutions!! But we can devise an immaginary number, termed i, squared - to deliver a negative number in complex mathematics which is the godfather of modern quantum science. But in the real world, its application has no relevance.