Western Provinces of Canada Separate?

[Randall]

These guys are the greatest. I learn so much from them. Susan Kokinda from Promethean has swiveled my head around the British Imperial System vs the American System (had never been aware of that) and the Anglo-Dutch Banking System - it's amazing. And when these 4 get together for their amiable chats it's the best. I'll post a few more chats just for the fun of it - they are a very breezy and very deep listen.

Published January 11, 2026: [Video Run Time 32:25] CRYPTO RICH POLITICS
"Trump’s Greenland Plan Exposed (ft. Kokinda, Krainer & Luongo) Today, Tom Luongo, Alex Krainer, and Kokinda explain why Trump's move for Greenland isn't just a headline it's a calculated 4D chess move in the Arctic. If you thought our Iran breakdown was deep, wait until you hear their verdict on this."

Alex Krainer's take on NATO is out of whack. NATO was formed as a league of Democratic Nations for the purpose of providing mutual support in the event of an attack on any member nation, and the Soviets were considered the most likely threat for such an attack in the future — and they weren't wrong. Had Ukraine already been in NATO, Russia wouldn't have put one boot on the ground there. Don't believe that? Have a look at what they were doing in Georgia before they hit Ukraine. It was basically a field test for what was to come in Ukraine.

 

[Tyger]

Alex Krainer's take on NATO is out of whack. NATO was formed as a league of Democratic Nations for the purpose of providing mutual support in the event of an attack on any member nation, and the Soviets were considered the most likely threat for such an attack in the future — and they weren't wrong. Had Ukraine already been in NATO, Russia wouldn't have put one boot on the ground there. Don't believe that? Have a look at what they were doing in Georgia before they hit Ukraine. It was basically a field test for what was to come in Ukraine.

There's another way of looking at NATO, and that is that it was formed by the British to control America. Because at the end of WW2 there was no reason to fear Russia. They had fought on 'our' side. In fact their losses far exceeded our losses. Russia was not our enemy but the scenario got flipped due to Britain (the death of FDR and the singular voice of Churchill). Trump is ending NATO's Imperial Control.

Through the Marshall Plan America rebuilt Europe and then - by virtue of Europe's finances not being caught up in rearming - it could spend its money on socialist programs and institutions. NATO - in effect - was America being given the role as the policeman of the world, patrolling the waters of the world to make free trade possible and to fight Britains's 'forever wars'.

The American System (vs the British Imperial System) - operative up to WW2 - saw Britain as the enemy, not Russia. In this short video Susan Kokinda goes into detail regarding the War Plan Red of the 1920s.

Published January 12, 2026: [Video Run Time 12:39] Promethean Updates
"In this episode, Susan Kokinda explores the historical and modern implications of War Plan Red, a 1920s U.S. military plan for war against Britain and its proxy, Canada.

"She argues that Donald Trump is reviving this strategic clarity to end 80 years of British influence over American foreign policy, discussing his recent moves regarding Greenland and NATO.

"Kokinda connects this stance to broader economic and political actions Trump is taking to dismantle monopolies and financial cartels, aiming to restore American sovereignty."

TIMESTAMPS
00:00 War Plan Red: The Last Time the Military Knew Our Real Enemy
02:04 NATO Leaders Now Discuss Protecting Greenland FROM the U.S.
05:25 War Plan Red: When America's Military Planned for War Against Britain
07:45 Breaking the Cartels: Trump Takes On Housing, Healthcare, and the Military-Industrial Complex

 

[Tyger]

At around 11:00 she says the key phrase: "Trump's moves on Greenland aren't about territorial expansion, they're about ending NATO as an instrument of Imperial Control .... "

[I have to insert this note here because I lost the editing window]

 

[Randall]

There's another way of looking at NATO, and that is that it was formed by the British to control America. Because at the end of WW2

Actually, UK Foreign Secretary Ernest Bevin was the driving the concept for a transatlantic alliance against Soviet expansion, supported by Canadian diplomat Lester B. Pearson, who helped draft the treaty, and US Senator Arthur Vandenberg, whose resolution enabled US participation.

there was no reason to fear Russia. They had fought on 'our' side. In fact their losses far exceeded our losses. Russia was not our enemy but the scenario got flipped due to Britain (the death of FDR and the singular voice of Churchill). Trump is ending NATO's Imperial Control.

However The Soviet Union was not a democratic nation. It was a one-party state controlled by the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (CPSU) and, for much of its history, functioned as a totalitarian or authoritarian regime.

Through the Marshall Plan America rebuilt Europe and then - by virtue of Europe's finances not being caught up in rearming - it could spend its money on socialist programs and institutions. NATO - in effect - was America being given the role as the policeman of the world, patrolling the waters of the world to make free trade possible and to fight Britains's 'forever wars'.

I think that's stretching the reality of the situation to accommodate a particular "conspiracy theory" like perspective — of which there are several we could go down e.g. The Illuminati, Rosicrucians, Freemasons, Alien Lizard people and so on.

The American System (vs the British Imperial System) - operative up to WW2 - saw Britain as the enemy, not Russia. In this short video Susan Kokinda goes into detail regarding the War Plan Red of the 1920s.

Published January 12, 2026: [Video Run Time 12:39] Promethean Updates
"In this episode, Susan Kokinda explores the historical and modern implications of War Plan Red, a 1920s U.S. military plan for war against Britain and its proxy, Canada.

"She argues that Donald Trump is reviving this strategic clarity to end 80 years of British influence over American foreign policy, discussing his recent moves regarding Greenland and NATO.

"Kokinda connects this stance to broader economic and political actions Trump is taking to dismantle monopolies and financial cartels, aiming to restore American sovereignty."

TIMESTAMPS
00:00 War Plan Red: The Last Time the Military Knew Our Real Enemy
02:04 NATO Leaders Now Discuss Protecting Greenland FROM the U.S.
05:25 War Plan Red: When America's Military Planned for War Against Britain
07:45 Breaking the Cartels: Trump Takes On Housing, Healthcare, and the Military-Industrial Complex

Oh sure — The war between the USA and UK goes all the way back to the War of Independence. So that's always in the background. The video you included is interesting, but not all there is to the Greenland story. It actually says that Greenland wants to deal directly with the USA — and I don't blame them. The UK is collapsing.

 

[Tyger]

I think that's stretching the reality of the situation to accommodate a particular "conspiracy theory" like perspective — of which there are several we could go down e.g. The Illuminati, Rosicrucians, Freemasons, Alien Lizard people and so on.

No conspiracy theory. It is a description of events as the decades played out, acknowledged by innumerable historians of whatever proclivity. America was the lynchpin of NATO that poured its treasure into 'defending' Europe and fighting its wars. Targeting Russia was a British 'thing'.

 

[Randall]

No conspiracy theory. It is a description of events as the decades played out, acknowledged by innumerable historians of whatever proclivity. America was the lynchpin of NATO that poured its treasure into 'defending' Europe and fighting its wars. Targeting Russia was a British 'thing'.

Sure — so are the other "conspiracy theories" ( The plandemic included ). I'm using the phrase "conspiracy theory" very loosely there. Just because such ideas tend to get pushed over into that category, doesn't mean they're not true. In fact, it seems that more often than not, there's more to them than the PTB ( whoever they are ) — want us to know. I just watched one on TUBI called Zeitgeist that uses "descriptions of events that played out" — by those accounts they're just as true. Here's Part 3 as seen on YouTube. It drags on and on — but many relevant points.

 

[Tyger]

Our trouble is we do not know history - certainly not recent history, in detail.

Sources:

Christopher M. Bell, 'Thinking the Unthinkable: British and American Naval Strategies for an Anglo-American War, 1918-1931',
The International History Review, Vol. 19, No. 4 (Nov. 1997).

Kevin Lippert, 'War Plan Red: The United States’ Plan to Invade Canada and Canada’s Secret Plan to Invade The United States' (New York: Princeton Architectural Press, 2015)

Stephen Roskill, 'Churchill and the Admirals'

Ben Wilson, 'Empire of the Deep: The Rise and Fall of the British Navy'



Published January 27, 2019: [Video Run Time 10:02] Historigraph Channel

 

[Tyger]

Here's a bit of analysis to do with Canada. I was listening to this when I was jolted awake when Kokinda states at around 27:00 that 'first it's Greenland, the next is Canada." I would recommend listening to the whole first 27 minutes since that will give a lot of context. They are a fun group to listen to and are always worth a listen.

Did you know that from the American perspective Canada IS the Cartel?

Published January 13, 2026: [Video Run Time 36:48] CRYPTO RICH POLITICS Channel
"Susan Kokinda, Alex Krainer & Tom Luongo break down Trump’s [future] trip to Davos and which side he’s really on. Is Trump going to Davos as an America First outsider taking on the globalist elite, or is he joining their agenda? In this explosive panel, we dig into what his visit really means for sovereignty, globalism and the future of US power."

 

[Randall]

Here's a bit of analysis to do with Canada. I was listening to this when I was jolted awake when Kokinda states at around 27:00 that 'first it's Greenland, the next is Canada." I would recommend listening to the whole first 27 minutes since that will give a lot of context.

When it comes to weapons and illicit drug "superlabs" — the USA has more of them inside their own border than Canada, so maybe they ought to clean their own house before making it an excuse to go after Canada.