NEGATIVE MASS IS IN TROUBLE
This was one of the best UFO threads ever on TheParacast's forum. It would be pity for it to die down. So I have some new info.
I liked that negative mass idea very much, so I've done some googling around. There are some good and some bad news ;-)
Bad news first ;-)
Unfortunately, although negative mass is derived and permuted by GR, it seems that there are quite opposite opinions about how it behaves.
Basically, there are two camps. One group of physicists, lead by Bondi, claims that both gravitational and inertial mass can be negative. That makes two masses, one positive other negative, run away in a direction of the positive mass. That view is supported by Wikipedia's article on Negative Mass.
But “The truth is rarely pure and never simple”. Our beloved, but often hasty Dr. Martin Tajmar, claims that negative and positive mass will move in a direction of the negative mass!? Check here @9:58:
Basically, the second camp of physicists states that, while gravitational mass can be both positive and negative, inertial mass can only be positive. And thus the difference in "runaway motion's" direction. Apparently, "runaway motion" is than in the direction of the negative mass, like in Dr. Tajmar's example.
I, somehow, prefer this idea to the one on Wikipedia. In Standard Model of QM inertial mass is described as lumps of Higg's bosons attaching themselves onto mass particles and impeding their movement. Negative inertial mass would mean Higg's bosons magically detaching themselves from particles with mass and even opening up a clear path in front of mass particles. I would say that equivalence principle that states that gravitational and inertial mass are equal, is simply incomplete and that it (maybe) states that absolute values of gravitational and inertial mass are equal. Not trying to challenge Einstein, just looking for a good answer.
Now, my question is, which interpretation of negative inertial mass behavior is true?
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Now, good news.
The above graph shows experimental results were negative effective mass was falling upwards in Earth's gravitational field!!!
Et voila, In the above video, @15:51, Dr. Martin Tajmar talks about lab experiment where a beam of neutrons with positive effective mass bent downwards in a gravitational field. But a big surprise was that the beam with negative effective mass traveled upwards in the gravitational field. Just check two peaks, one for up beam and one for down beam, at the bottom of the above photo. That's phenomenal result, although mass was just "effectively" negative, it was still repelled by Earth's gravitational field. That experiment practically confirms existence of negative mass in laboratory!
Dr. Martin Tajmar here quotes a paper "Gravity and inertia in neutron crystal optics and VCN interferometry" by prof. Zeilinger, A., published back in Jun 1996 in the Journal of the Physical Society of Japan (ISSN 0031-9015, volume 65 (suppl.A); p. 277-280). I looked in vain at JPSJ's database of white papers and couldn't find anything. Most likely removed by MIBs ;-(.
Prof. Zeilinger worked at Vienna University and was quite well known and respected in Austria and Germany. His experiment was about EFFECTIVE mass of neutrons. He passed neutrons through a specially prepared crystal of Silicone (Si), and some neutrons, as predicted, came with positive effective mass and some with negative effective mass. Than prof. Zeilinger turned the experiment on the side, 90deg, so that neutron beam traveled horizontaly or, if you want, perpendicular to the gravitational field.
Don't take lightly papers coming from Vienna University. 6 out of 9 scientists that were crucial for Manhattan project graduated at Vienna University of Physics ;-) !
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
And of course, in closing, one has to mention Daniel Fry and his description of the craft. Here Daniel Fry meets Dr. Martin Tajmar, who in the above video mentions that he experiments with electrets.
In short, Daniel Fry said there was one toroid on the top of the craft and another toroid at a bottom. Toroids are standard devices in electrical circuits that store magnetic field's energy. Both toroids were supplied by electric current from a device in a "big black box", that was akin to a capacitor, but it was not capacitor. Device just contained huge amount of electrons squeezed together, but was presumably able to deliver them as instantaneously as a capacitor would. It is important to say, that two toroids wold contain any magnetic fields almost 99% inside themselves, with negotiable leakage. Any external magnetic field would only come from pulsating electric field and currents traveling through conductive craft's hull.
Now, that "big black box" device sounds a lot as electret. Exactly what Dr. Tajmar is using. Electret is an electrostatic equivalent of permanent magnet and it can hold a dipole electric fields for a long time due its high internal resistance. Practically Daniel Fry described something which is very similar to well known LC circuit, only with electret instead of capacitor. As well, referring once more to my a link in my signature, it is very well documented by researchers that UFOs are surrounded by pulsating EM fields (stalling car engines, radio interference, muscle paralysis etc.).
What I am aiming at, Daniel Fry's structure of the craft seems to had been an LC circuit and the LC circuit was pulsating through the conductive hull of the craft (presumably some metamaterial) placed in circuit between toroids and electret. LC circuits are standard circuits in modern electronics that in their variations are used to produce EM fields for antennas and other kinds of EM field emitters. That would explain EM fields around a typical UFOs and pumping of metamaterials with EM energy to possibly create negative effective mass.
It is worth noting that Colonel Corso introduced a notion that US and UK were able to bring UFOs down when pointing extremely strong and focused tracking radars at UFOs. That one aids metamaterial theory very well, because electrical currents caused by tracking radar's microwaves would mess up pre-designed and finely tuned original currents and make UFO uncontrollable.