>>help technical UFO Forensics.
>>This will....attract more scientists and
>>engineers into UFO Forensics.
Apparently, unlike you, I am an engineer. I also have personal experience working
with high-power military directed energy weapons. And I am a serious
ET investigator.
>>There used to be a big Boing 747 that had a huge
>>chemical laser onboard, but the project was stopped
>>because, while successful, it was too expensive and complicated.
You believe everything you read in the press?
>>...all the current US systems would not be able to track on an
>>object that can, say, fly at Mach 2 and suddenly change
>>direction by 90 deg and do it several times in a raw.
There are many assumptions being made in your statement. One being that
they ET objects are able to predict, faster than light can travel, to prevent their
being painted with a DEW beam. The point that I made, which you obviously
did not understand or ignored, is that ET apparently are unable to detect
machine intention, whereas ET have repeatedly demonstrated that they can
detect Human intention, at a distance.
>>reported UFOs are usually with mirror finish, which would reflect 99%
>>of laser light. So laser would loose power not just by traveling
>>through air, but because it would have 99% of its energy reflected.
Most of the destructive power of LASER based directed energy weapons is not
light based, but are effected by plasma.
kronoz...time reveals all