• NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

Travis Walton - September 21, 2014

Wow, I just picked up on this now.

Rutkowski: After all these years, how do you respond to the critics who are hammering away, "It didn't happen"?

Walton:
It kind of depends. Some of them can seem like more of a threat because they actually have something to say. But so many of these are without substance.

So as you pointed out; if the concern has substance it's a threat. A threat to what? The irresistible inference is that if the concern has substance it threatens to discredit the story.

"There is the endeavor to deflect any suspicion from himself, to efface all traces of the crime, and an impulse
growing more and more intense suddenly to cry out his secret in the street before all people, or in milder cases,
to confide it at least to one person, to free himself from the terrible burden." - The Compulsion to Confess
I dunno man. That sounds awfully close to this:
BloomCountyLooseTailsHoffapg25top.jpg
 
I dunno man. That sounds awfully close to this ...

I suppose we could wonder then what Walton meant to say rather than what he did say. He didn't really mean to say that skeptics with substantial points are a threat. He meant he loves them and wants to invite them over for dinner ... ;).
 
Last edited:
Back
Top