I got it around the wrong way
hahaha....
I love Stantons piece of mind, anywhere. But if he's been that involved in the field, in 'my opinion', than he ought to shed some light on a few perspectives that are seemingly 'different' from his own. Or in other words, include himself '&' his ideals in untrodden territory.
David asked why did the 'visitors/intruders/abductors/aliens/extraterrestrials/unknowns' (whatever.) place a cup-piece over Benny's genitals & Stan jutted back, &/or commented in a rather strange & 'taken-aback' mannerism which consisted of 'Why would you ask that"?...
Why? Because, we're so involved (we= mostly anyone involved within the abduction community) with a certain set of parameters, that do involve the notorious 'semen extration' & 'sample analysis' 'consistencies'....
Never at all, was it out of the line for David/Gene (or anyone) to question such a situation. I do believe that Stan feels as if this was (& this is mere speculative-conclusion) a unique abduction experience, that separates itself from the line of status-quo scenarios....In other words, the Betty & Barney Hill situation, is alot more different than your George Adamski case; ala; a Contactee Experience.
& The star Map still leaves me intrigued...
Goody.