• NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

Questions for Jim Moseley on UFO Fakers

Gene Steinberg

Forum Super Hero
Staff member
On July 4, Chris and I will take a break from the holiday and record a new interview with the one and only Jim Moseley about the frauds in the UFO field.

He's exposed some of them over the years, including contactee George Adamski and others, so he's the perfect person to discuss the subject. And since he's pulled a few stunts himself, some say it takes one to know one. :)

If you have questions, feel free to post them here.
 
Ask Jim if he is -still- churning out Saucer Smear.
If it is still non-scheduled, and still requires love (or hate) offerings, of the subscribers choosing. (Especially if We are cheap-arsed and poor.)
Thanks for having Olde Jim on again.
 
G'day Mr Jim Moseley,
1. Barny & Betty Hill frauds or legitimate Case?
2.Any MIB encounters and your experience with so called crystal skull presenters?
3. Roswell just a Cold War Military Intrusion by Spooks or a Military Biological accident turned into a well planed UFO hoax ?
 
Do you think that the hoaxing, fraud, and resume padding in the field of paranormal and UFO research is the primary reason it isn't taken seriously by mainstream science, the media, and the general public and not so much the close mindedness of inappropriate skepticism?

Does the lack of accountability within the UFO/paranormal research community itself forever consign it to the realm of entertainment and not serious research?

Isn't it reasonable for a speaker or author to assume that people (conference organizers, interviewers, researchers, or fans) are going to check their references and claims? Does that happen often enough do you think?
 
Ask Jim if he is -still- churning out Saucer Smear.
If it is still non-scheduled, and still requires love (or hate) offerings, of the subscribers choosing. (Especially if We are cheap-arsed and poor.)
Thanks for having Olde Jim on again.

I noticed Saucer Smear (back issues) being sold for the Kindle the other day. I think he may have made a deal with Amazon. I saw him on a documentary that was two or three years old and he seems to be getting up in age a little bit. He must have stories about all kinds of folks from the field. So while you get the goods on the "believers" also, ask him about Klass and Randi and some of those types of folks. :)
 
Santilli - Still partying?
Imbrogno ... Why would the Djin want to frame an MIT grad?
Lazar - Was his real job waxing the Sport Model?
MJ-12 or Plan 9 ... which one is more entertaining?
Pleiadians vs Raelians ... Who'd win in a cat fight?
So many channelers to choose from ... who's got the best programming?
Fire In The Sky or a Woodcutter's Tale?

J. Randall Murphy
USI Calgary
 
Ok, you've debunked and poured the light of truth upon the unwashed in the field of ufology...
Was there a single incident that you believe was unexplained, which went into your too hard basket to explain?
 
Dear Mr. Moseley,

1.Do you think the IFSB founder Albert K. Bender was visited by three mysterious men dressed in black?

2.And do you believe he really did experienced some kind of psychic contact as told in his book Flying Saucers and the Three Men or was this just a stunt to sell more books?

Thanks.
 
Back
Top