Some of these words would be just about impossible to get. For most people, psychic information shows up in the form of imagery or impressions. There's no image or symbol that I know of that can express a concept like "left" or "insincere."
If you can find a psychic who can pass this test, you've found someone with abilities so rare and extraordinary that I would say they are almost no longer psychic, they're something else. Wasn't there a woman in Russia who could move matchsticks with her mind? And, if so, good for her, but so what? What do any of these abilities mean about humanity if they are rare and out of reach? Matchstick Lady has no plans to become a superhero, so far as I know.
Psychic ability is a normal part of the human psyche, which is some of what, from my perspective, I feel you guys are missing. You think you're looking for something extraordinary, someone with some magic ability. And maybe that exists, somewhere. But I find it profoundly uninteresting.
What is more interesting to me is the latent power within every human being that happens to be almost totally ignored and undeveloped in this culture. And this power obviously exists, in the same way that it seems apparent that UFOs and ghosts exist on some level. These things appear in every culture in some form throughout history. Reputable, sane, insightful, intelligent people report experiences with these things, but science has failed and continues to fail to pin down any of these things in a scientifically understandable way. This does not mean they don't exist! What madness it is to think so. My memory of Shakespeare is not that great, but wasn't Hamlet crazy when he was going on about "to be or not to be"? The scientific method is not the only valid way to understand reality. It just isn't.
Figuring out what psychic ability is, how to use it, and how to bring it out -- these, to me, are the interesting questions. And if you look into the field, you will see that people have made significant and fascinating progress studying these topics. Usually, they are not wearing lab coats, but we're all gonna have to get over that.
I came out as a psychic here in part because there is so much misunderstanding about psychic abilities. The psychic part of my life is intensely personal, in some ways more personal than anything else, so it's hard to talk about, on both a verbal and an emotional level. It's particularly hard to talk about in an environment where people tend to assume I'm a scam artist. But I can deal.
From my perspective, I feel like some of you are missing the forest for the trees. I don't think I've done a good job yet explicating what I want to say. Figuring out how to say what needs to be said on this topic is going to have to be, at best, a journey for me.
Herein lies some of the problems with alleged psychic abilities. When a psychic initially contacts us they usually say that they are 100% accurate, but when we start to explain what it means to be accurate they start to back away. There are many forms of alleged psychic abilities. For this discussion we are specifically talking about telepathy, the ability to read another person's mind without seeing the other person. If you can read someone's mind then you should be able to be exact and not only be able to pick up imagery or impressions. That is not telepathy. That is intuition/guessing and there is nothing paranormal about that.
I believe the "Russian Matchstick Lady" you are referring to is Nina Kulagina. Her abilities have never been properly tested and people familiar with stage magic tricks have examined her videos and have been able to reproduce them using sleight of hand tricks:
http://www.cicap.org/new/articolo.php?id=101003
This week's edition of Revision 3' Scam School is actually about how to do one of Nina Kulagina's "telekinesis" tricks:
<embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://revision3.com/player-v2534" allowfullscreen="true" width="555" height="312" />
Humans are very good at pattern recognition and this ability is one of the primary reasons many people believe in psychic abilities. However, when these abilities are properly tested they are found to not exist or to only exist within the range of chance.
Here is a copy of the IIG's Psychic Cheat Sheet that we had out to audiences in line to see a psychic's performance. These are things to be aware of when visiting any person claiming to be psychic. This one was specifically adapted for Sylvia Browne:
A Note about Sylvia Browne’s Powers…
Is she genuine? Here are some simple helpful hints for evaluating Sylvia’s performance today:
1. Demand Specifics. Mary is not Margaret, Marie, or Maria.
2. Count the Missed Guesses. The wrong guesses will greatly outnumber the few lucky guesses.
3. Beware of Generalities. Most people in a given culture experience fairly similar lives, making it easy to guess.
4. Be Conscious of Giving Information When Being Read. When Sylvia asks questions, the person being read is giving the answers, not her.
5. Watch for a Shift in Direction. Does Sylvia suddenly jump to another subject when she makes a wrong guess?
6. Ask for Last Names. Everyone knows a John, a Mike, a Sue, a Mary or a Pat – that’s not impressive.
7. Don’t React! Psychics like Sylvia use visual feedback to tell if they’re on the right track. If they’re really psychic, you shouldn’t need to help them along.
8. Who, Specifically, is the Guess Aimed at? A guess directed at couples or groups guarantees many more “hits”.
9. Remember Why People Go to Psychics. Psychics are like police stations, psychiatry offices and hospitals – most people go to them because of a problem. Love, money, job, health, grief are the most common reasons and are easy guesses.
The
Independent Investigations Group is interested in how well Sylvia does at her appearances, because she refuses to demonstrate her abilities to skeptics. We welcome any feedback to
[email protected]. Visit
Independent Investigations Group and
http://www.CSICOP.org for more information on psychics and psychic phenomenon.
Even if many people believe something to be true does not make that thing true. The plural of "anecdote" is not "evidence" and this is the hardest thing for believers in whatever form of paranormal ability to understand. If an ability disappears the moment it is to be properly tested it means that this power obviously does not exist.
Please keep in mind that the Independent Investigations Group WANTS to scientifically verify some form of paranormal ability. It would be one of the greatest achievements in science and would guarantee someone a Nobel prize. However, no matter how much we want something to be true we will not relax the scientific controls necessary to prove something to be true.
-Derek