Hi Paracast Forum members,
Allow me to introduce myself directly to you since you'll be hearing another radio show with me on the 11th, as well as contributions from committed, diehard skeptics and debunkers of the case (and me) such as TerraX. Hopefully, in a relatively short amount of time, I can present to you enough information that you can review, research and THINK through yourselves, to determine for yourselves, the truth about the Meier case.
I intend to answer any questions raised as best I can and sometimes that answer is provided in the form of a link to an article, or a site, that already contains those answers.
First, here's a note about my apparent Jekyll and Hyde personality. My first contact from David was in the form of an email, of which most of you are aware, that basically called me a shameless liar who associates with, and represents, unscrupulous people. Thanks, and nice to meet you too. And, I should add, that the hatchet job done on the case, and me, by David at the end of my first interview was added?after the fact. I was neither told about this in advance nor after the show aired; a friend ? in China ? told me about it after I sent the link out to her.
This approach is blatantly out of integrity and one that I've never encountered before in all the years that I've been doing interviews, a number of which were less than friendly in their approach, which is something that in itself doesn't bother me. It does bother me, however, to be attacked behind my back and then to be greeted with yet another attack in an introductory email. I will let you know, if you haven't discovered it already, that there is plenty of evidence on the internet that I respond rather vigorously to such approaches. When someone sets the tone and context of the conversation in attack mode, and/or when they vigorously criticize the case and my findings and remain completely non-responsive to an abundance of countering information ? as David and Gene did and continue to do ? I speak to them in the language that they have chosen. Perhaps the difference to me is that it's not personal, colorful maybe, but not personal. And that means that it's their thinking, researching, logic, etc. (or usually lack thereof) that is the actual target of my barbs, not their person. However, being only human, I admit that it has sometimes gotten into that kind of expression from me too.
Frankly, I'd prefer not to do it but there is another motivation behind my words that seems to escape notice, i.e. I figure that if I insult people enough (who attack me) with the FACTS, then, out of the deep desire to prove me wrong, to shred Meier's credibility, to prove their own theories correct and emerge ?victorious? ? they will actually do the deep due diligence REQUIRED to do so.
BTW, this is the response from David to my simple request to join this form:
From:
[email protected]
Subject: The Paracast forums
Date: July 5, 2006 11:20:31 AM PDT
To:
[email protected]
Cc:
[email protected]
Horn,
You can indeed register and post on the Paracast
forums, but Gene & I reserve the right to delete
abusive posts and ban destructive posters. You behave,
and your freedom of expression is granted. You get
crazy and vitriolic, you get booted. Comprende?
dB
Well, isn't that friendly?and just a tad prejudicial, hmmmm?
Now, I have a new article on my site at:
They Fly.com - The Billy Meier 'Hoax' Exposed ? - The Wedding Cake UFO Controversy
This article deals with one piece of evidence that has been attacked by both the author of the referred to site (TerraX) and David, i.e. the so-called Wedding Cake UFO (WCUFO) photos and video. David has confidently and conclusively stated that these (there were several sizes of this craft) were ?models? and ?miniatures?, though he has firmly declined to duplicate one (or explain the failure of a professional model maker/photographer ? and major opponent of the Meier case ? to duplicate one successfully either).
Additional information refuting claims that there were models involved can be found here:
The Wedding Cake UFOs
I also mentioned that there was a video of this craft, which you can view here:
In the video, the craft is actually, at its farthest, some 300?-500? from the camera. Now, David stated, unequivocally in the latest interview, that this is a ?two-dimensional cut-out?. So we have to BELIEVE that the one-armed Meier was not only a fantastically accomplished model maker, some 20+ years ago, but also could make such a remarkable 14? cut-out (as to look three-dimensional) and suspend it, without any visible means of support, so as to render it virtually motionless (on a windy Swiss hillside), and also nonchalantly go about videotaping it?all without being observed by anyone.
I suggest that the Meier case is either the biggest, most impenetrable hoax or the most important story in all of human history. So, in concluding this lengthy introduction, allow me to direct you to one of many articles on my site that will introduce you to some of the scientific experts who analyzed, and authenticated, Meier's evidence:
TheyFly.com - The Billy Meier UFO Contacts (see: Scientific Experts' Comments On Meier's Evidence)
You might also read the Analysis of Meier's UFO Photographs and Report On UFO Sound Recordings.
Michael Horn
Authorized American Media Representative
The Billy Meier Contacts
www.theyfly.com