NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!
karlemids said:Can anyone post links to this vid/pics please?
Cheers!
valiens said:Paranormal Packrat, you've seen the video? Do you believe it's authentic?
Paranormal Packrat said:I'm curious. Who here is just recently finding out about this Stan Romanek case?
Paranormal Packrat said:Stan was very open with his vids and pics for a few years. He wasn't witholding anything that I can recall. I watched a lot of his stuff. He left the scene due to some reasons I have not been able to confirm, and now is back, and now is saying it's in other people's hands.
Paranormal Packrat said:I recommend to sit back, not jump to conclusions on the bases of your "gut" (try using your freakin head) and wait.
Paranormal Packrat said:Is it really that hard to consider a case inconclusive? Do you really need to knock, or accept it yet? In my view, it's no where near done. Question yes. But many people question (rhetorically) don't hear an answer within the hour, then conclude the case is rubbish. &&*(^%^%$%#