The UFO phenomenon is far more complex than a single answer to the entire problem. Here’s an analogy you might (and I mean MIGHT) be able to grasp -
Like all paranormal phenomenon, the UFO question is best described as an intricately woven tapestry.
Some people look at the tapestry and see only the thing they want to see. For the majority like you that appears to be ET. They surround themselves with like minded observers who see the same thing. Thus they conclude what they see is real because other people see it too. And so they only embrace like minded observers who can create an echo chamber that produces what they want - a self reinforcing bias.
As a result they can’t see anything else. They’re blind. If someone says to them the tapestry doesn’t show ET at all, they go ballistic and get snarky like you. Because your bias isn’t being reinforced and hence you’re pissed off. Anyone who dares disagree with your observation(s) and “righteous” conclusions you simply dismiss as a loon, moron, skeptic or debunker who you immediately attack because you can’t stand to have your bias challenged.
However if one took the time to actually examine the tapestry in detail, they’d notice the entire thing is made up of different types of threads altogether. Some are more common than others, and some are unique only to themselves. Together all the threads make up the tapestry.
Being blind and biased, you think the entire tapestry is woven from the very same thread. Thus you can’t possibly comprehend the complexity involved. So you rampage like a child stomping her feet because you can’t bear to think your myopic perspective could be incorrect. Because if it is incorrect, that means you’re conclusions are wrong. And your ego can’t handle being wrong. So you just rampage all the more.
I just love it how you move around direct questions and just continue on with your cheap lamentations and circular diatribes.
All that "surrounding oneself with like minded observes" and "echo chambers" is general shit staining that doesn't mean much and could be also redirected at you.
I don't recall us even talking much about various hypothesis - please do point out where did I mention that ETH is the only valid theory for the phenomenon? On the other hand, you are:
1) evading direct questions
2) presenting cheap personal conclusions and untrue statements about certain researchers in the field, not to mention seeing ludicrous "agendas"
3) using "read and get more informed" forms first and, when faced with a similar return, hypocritically labeling that as my own device
4) trying incredibly hilarious "strong sexual theme" moves as a point of discrediting research - makes me wonder if I'm talking to a puritan on the other end
5) obsessed with an "anty-Christianity" bias, as if Christianity is the ultimate truth and something not to be criticized or not to be seen for what it is - just one of many sects, but also one that managed to get a lot of followers and become one of the contending major religions
It seems to me that you are really enamored with the whole Judeo-Christian interpretation. I love it how some people get presented with a certain religious narrative at a certain point in life and then proceed on to feel about it as "the shit" for the rest of their life and think that mentioning stuff from "their book" makes up for a valid argument.
Please answer my direct questions, Christian.