NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!
My first thought was this looks like the Wok burner on my gas cooktop with the gas turned down very low
Doesn't look like a gas burner to me. The color is similar, but where are the irregular flames?
If you think it's a gas burner then try taking a photo of your gas burner. Then composite it in a photo of your roof. See if you can get it to look the same. And of course even if you can recreate the photo that doesn't prove anything except you made a similar looking photo.
Also the enhanced very shows some structure. But ignore the blocky JPEG artifacts.
Just because you can think of a mundane item it looks like doesn't mean that's what it is.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Can you tell if it's an authentic picture?
How is that possible by looking at a video?
The original image would have to be analyzed.
But from looking at what they are showing it doesn't look like a gas flame or explain how a gas flame image would be incorporated into that image.
It's not that difficult if you have something like Photoshop and know how to use it. But most people just aren't that good at faking pictures and you can see where they pasted it in, and often the resolution doesn't match.
To jump to the first thing it reminds you of and calling it fake is irresponsible.
It's an interesting photo. And it might never be able to be "proven" either way.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
How is that possible by looking at a video?
The original image would have to be analyzed.
But from looking at what they are showing it doesn't look like a gas flame or explain how a gas flame image would be incorporated into that image.
It's not that difficult if you have something like Photoshop and know how to use it. But most people just aren't that good at faking pictures and you can see where they pasted it in, and often the resolution doesn't match.
To jump to the first thing it reminds you of and calling it fake is irresponsible.
It's an interesting photo. And it might never be able to be "proven" either way.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Im wondering about the pink (hot?) spots
Again it seems to me that IF and i say IF this is a gas burner, what sort of image filter might render the hotter areas pink
Not proof of anything, nor is it meant to be other than to illustrate why i saw a similarity between the original image and my cooktop turned down low
The propertions also match rather nicely this one (lower left hand side)
Again not calling FAKE, but that was my first thought, the blue is the same as mine burns and the shape and visable structures remind me of a gas burner.
There is also the two external looking structures in the original pic, in my pics ive taken the pot stand assemply off the burner, but had i left them on they too would have been consistant in appearance. mine extend to just over the rim of the outer ring