It presents no problem to create some orbs, alright.
But then, the same counts for ghosts, UFOs, or anything else.
Right! What does this imply? Carry this thought a little further, and you're there.
Did you ask me if I can present scientific evidence that demonstrates any existence beyond the body's death ? Alright, first of all, I cannot offer you any 'scientific evidence' at all. I presume that you knew that
I had a hunch.
But you know what ? I couldn't care less about 'scientific evidence'.
That's okay. Neither does any supernaturalist. I'm in the minority here, not you!
Science says that exotic matter weighs less than nothing. OH OH !
Why is such a thing taken as a fact ? Does science have the means to prove that ?
Um, yes.
Now, back to the subject. Science is not inclined to prove the existence beyond the body's death. Why ? The mind-imprisoning institute called church wouldn't be pleased with that and for another reason, it wouldn't gain any financial benefits to anyone.
I thought "church" was based on the existence of an immortal soul? Wouldn't the churches fund scientific research that verified the existence of a soul? I mean, the soul is the entire
raison d'etre for the church.
Do you really believe scientists are controlled by the church? (Why is it always the Christians who get this flak? You find Muslims, Orthodox Jews, Hindus, Buddhists, "pagans," psychics, remote viewers, contactees and voodoo practitioners
less invested in the supernatural?)
And if science
was controlled by those nefarious, all-conspiring Christians, then I'm mystified as to why we're having an Intelligent Design controversy in our schools and courts, and why the Christians are consistently losing to
scientists and science advocates. I'm mystified as to how the Republicans lost the 2006 midterms. How did the Great Christ Conspiracy miss that one?
Science is a convenient way to manipulate. Scientific evidence ? No, thank you.
Click your ruby slippers together and repeat: "That which is inconvenient does not exist. That which is inconvenient does not exist. That which is inconvenient does not exist."
And before I come to an end, if you experiment with relaxation exercises or Out-of-Body Experiences, it quickly becomes evident that there is much more than what we perceive as reality. Would you "need" scientific approval of what you know is real ? And if it was, what would happen if you had an OBE and afterwards science would tell you that it is all just brain chemistry. Would you forget your experience and go along with them ?
First of all, OBEs have natural explanations and are not supernatural phenomena. They are the intellect's misinterpretation of a range of physical circumstances. Relaxation exercises are physical in nature, have physical effects, and have nothing to do with the supernatural. I meditate every morning. It has nothing to do with supernaturalism. It is a calming technique that teaches me focus and patience - two items of which I am in short supply.
If I thought I had an OBE, I would realize that what I had has happened to other people, has been reasonably explained by science and is nothing for which I should throw all reason, logic and science out the window.