• NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, 11 years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

Dear Diary - Fauci et al

Free episodes:


The Download With Jefferey Jaxsen
NEW VAX SCHEDULE, FAUCI’S PHONE, UFOS, 6G & A.I.



TRY TO SET YOUR TDS ASIDE WHILE WATCHING THIS
TRUMP IS ONLY IN THE FIRST PART
 
Last edited:
Ch ch ch ch change$...

1979: fasting glucose over 140 makes you diabetic.
1997: lowered to 126.
Millions of new diabetics. Same blood.

1997: prediabetes starts at 110.
2003: lowered to 100.
A third of American adults, created by a footnote.

1984: high blood pressure is 160/95.
2017: lowered to 130/80.
American hypertension goes from 32 per cent of adults to 46. Thirty-one million new patients in a morning.

2001: the cholesterol target is 130.
2004: lowered to 100, and to 70 for the high risk.
Statin eligibility expands by millions.
Eight of the nine men who wrote that 2004 update were on the payroll of companies selling statins. They disclosed it only when forced.

1994: a WHO panel invents osteopenia. Bone that is not thin enough to break, given a name and a prescription. Half of older women qualify.

Nobody got sicker on any of those dates. A committee sat down and a number moved.
The threshold drops, the market widens, and the drug is already licensed and sitting in the warehouse.

Your grandfather was healthy at 145/92. You are ill at 132/81.

Nothing about the body has changed. Only the paperwork, and who profits from it.
 
Last edited:
From Mark Mcdougall - "Breaking: Fauci's texts show he and other top officials feared the COVID shot was causing miscarriages and fetal abnormalities - while they told the public it was "safe."

Next week, Ottawa Police Trials Officer Chris Renwick will punish Detective Helen Grus - the one officer with the integrity to investigate a cluster of infant deaths that was triple the normal rate. Read those two sentences again. That is where we are.

On January 25, 2021, Fauci put it in writing: the "significant cytokines storm and fever" after the second dose "theoretically could be associated with miscarriage in the 1st trimester." In the same chain, Dr. Vivek Murthy - then Biden's nominee for U.S. Surgeon General - raised concerns about the mRNA causing mutations in a developing fetus and called Fauci's warning "a really good point."

Nine days later, Fauci told the public there were "no red flags" for pregnant women.

Pregnant women had been excluded from the trials. They were injected with an experimental genetic product that should never have gone near an expectant mother. Babies died.
A year later in Ottawa, Detective Helen Grus's own squad brought her the numbers - infant deaths were running at triple the normal rate. She started asking the same question those men had asked each other in private. Of everyone who saw that data, only Grus acted. She was suspended for it.

Trials Officer Chris Renwick's decision to convict her of Discreditable Conduct was reprehensible and corrupt. He published his decision only after refusing to let the defence present expert medical, legal, and policing evidence that her suspicions were reasonable, and that she had both the authority and the duty to act as she did.

Every officer is entitled to a fair hearing and a meaningful opportunity to mount a full defence. Renwick would not allow it.

With that ruling to exclude expert evidence, every observer knew that Renwick had decided the verdict before day one of what would become the longest, most expensive disciplinary hearing in Canadian policing history.

His real legacy is in the same decision. Renwick ruled that police officers should seek permission before investigating "public officials" and in criminal cases with "political and societal ramifications."

Police must now ask permission before investigating the powerful.

Renwick shredded the founding principle of professional policing - the one Robert Peel built the modern force around in 1829: police serve the law impartially, free of improper political interference or control.


Canada's Supreme Court affirmed it in R. v. Campbell and Shirose - an officer investigating a crime "is not acting as a government functionary or as an agent of anybody." The Ipperwash Inquiry spent years underlining the same rule. Politicians do not direct investigations.
Trials Officer Renwick threw out 200 years of that tradition and bolted political control onto police operations.

Politics stopped a police investigation into a cluster of dead babies. Chris Renwick read the evidence, then buried it.


On August 18th, he hands down the punishment.

A few weeks later, the Allison Inquiry opens on Parliament Hill to examine COVID vaccine injuries and deaths.

Read Renwick's own words again. "Public officials." "Political and societal ramifications."

That is what Detective Helen Grus is being punished for. That is what every officer in this country now has to weigh before starting any investigation.

- Donald Best CA [on X]
 
Moderna's new mRNA flu shot. Negatively effective. Package insert 92 pages long? Again no placebo trials. 73% had negative reactions.

MFLUSIVA
"A few more points to add from the 92 page FDA approval document (I was mistaken, the package insert wasn’t actually that long, so there’s less info and context available now if that makes you feel better.):
- they noted that creating a new mRNA vaccine was necessary because flu shot is not that effective (lol)
- significantly more side effects and deaths in the mRNA group
- their conditional approval for 65 and over is dependent on two studies that they need to perform with at least 800,000 sample size, meaning, they’re gonna push this hard on grandparents because they want that approval for Medicare." - Katie Collins PA-C



 
Ch ch ch ch change$...

1979: fasting glucose over 140 makes you diabetic.
1997: lowered to 126.
Millions of new diabetics. Same blood.

1997: prediabetes starts at 110.
2003: lowered to 100.
A third of American adults, created by a footnote.

1984: high blood pressure is 160/95.
2017: lowered to 130/80.
American hypertension goes from 32 per cent of adults to 46. Thirty-one million new patients in a morning.

2001: the cholesterol target is 130.
2004: lowered to 100, and to 70 for the high risk.
Statin eligibility expands by millions.
Eight of the nine men who wrote that 2004 update were on the payroll of companies selling statins. They disclosed it only when forced.

1994: a WHO panel invents osteopenia. Bone that is not thin enough to break, given a name and a prescription. Half of older women qualify.

Nobody got sicker on any of those dates. A committee sat down and a number moved.
The threshold drops, the market widens, and the drug is already licensed and sitting in the warehouse.

Your grandfather was healthy at 145/92. You are ill at 132/81.

Nothing about the body has changed. Only the paperwork, and who profits from it.
 
From Mark Mcdougall - "Breaking: Fauci's texts show he and other top officials feared the COVID shot was causing miscarriages and fetal abnormalities - while they told the public it was "safe."

Next week, Ottawa Police Trials Officer Chris Renwick will punish Detective Helen Grus - the one officer with the integrity to investigate a cluster of infant deaths that was triple the normal rate. Read those two sentences again. That is where we are.


On January 25, 2021, Fauci put it in writing: the "significant cytokines storm and fever" after the second dose "theoretically could be associated with miscarriage in the 1st trimester." In the same chain, Dr. Vivek Murthy - then Biden's nominee for U.S. Surgeon General - raised concerns about the mRNA causing mutations in a developing fetus and called Fauci's warning "a really good point."

Nine days later, Fauci told the public there were "no red flags" for pregnant women.

Pregnant women had been excluded from the trials. They were injected with an experimental genetic product that should never have gone near an expectant mother. Babies died.

A year later in Ottawa, Detective Helen Grus's own squad brought her the numbers - infant deaths were running at triple the normal rate. She started asking the same question those men had asked each other in private. Of everyone who saw that data, only Grus acted. She was suspended for it.

Trials Officer Chris Renwick's decision to convict her of Discreditable Conduct was reprehensible and corrupt. He published his decision only after refusing to let the defence present expert medical, legal, and policing evidence that her suspicions were reasonable, and that she had both the authority and the duty to act as she did.

Every officer is entitled to a fair hearing and a meaningful opportunity to mount a full defence. Renwick would not allow it.

With that ruling to exclude expert evidence, every observer knew that Renwick had decided the verdict before day one of what would become the longest, most expensive disciplinary hearing in Canadian policing history.

His real legacy is in the same decision. Renwick ruled that police officers should seek permission before investigating "public officials" and in criminal cases with "political and societal ramifications."

Police must now ask permission before investigating the powerful.

Renwick shredded the founding principle of professional policing - the one Robert Peel built the modern force around in 1829: police serve the law impartially, free of improper political interference or control.

Canada's Supreme Court affirmed it in R. v. Campbell and Shirose - an officer investigating a crime "is not acting as a government functionary or as an agent of anybody." The Ipperwash Inquiry spent years underlining the same rule. Politicians do not direct investigations.

Trials Officer Renwick threw out 200 years of that tradition and bolted political control onto police operations.

Politics stopped a police investigation into a cluster of dead babies. Chris Renwick read the evidence, then buried it.


On August 18th, he hands down the punishment.

A few weeks later, the Allison Inquiry opens on Parliament Hill to examine COVID vaccine injuries and deaths.

Read Renwick's own words again. "Public officials." "Political and societal ramifications."

That is what Detective Helen Grus is being punished for. That is what every officer in this country now has to weigh before starting any investigation.

- Donald Best CA [on X]
 
"Thousands of messages from Anthony Fauci’s government-issued phone are now being examined, including private discussions about vaccine safety concerns involving pregnant women. Critics argue some of those private conversations don’t match what Americans were being told publicly at the time."
 
Vaccine talk starting at 18:00.

A US General's Warning: The Next Civil War Starts In Ireland
Published August 12, 2026: [Video Run Time 1:03:14] Rich Does Politics Channel


 
Vaccine talk starting at 18:00.

A US General's Warning: The Next Civil War Starts In Ireland
Published August 12, 2026: [Video Run Time 1:03:14] Rich Does Politics Channel



Bridgen is definitely awake — couldn't be bought-off. A really good discussion that tells it like it is.

The problem now, seems to be that those who are still dug-in on the other side of the barricades, just write-off the hearings and inquiries as political witch hunts, kangaroo courts, or whatever will help reinforce their MSM Vax Cult programming. With them, evidence doesn't work. Valid counterpoint doesn't work. The only thing I've seen work is when they themselves or someone they love gets vaccine injured — and even some of them still think they made the right choice — for the "greater good" BS.


BTW: You can copy a video URL at the start point you want, by checking the "Start at" box when the "Share" panel opens. It seems to be working here for me most of the time. It doesn't hurt to mention it either — thanks !
 
Last edited:
@Randall I hope you listened to the end because there is some interesting stuff right at the end. Not to mention they finally get into the civil war in Ireland. BTW here's an interesting factoid: apparently the Ukraine War has halved the cost of armaments on the black market. All that money and arms that have been flooded into Ukraine have been funneled into the black market out into the world.

At about 43:00 (I think - maybe before that) they start going into Q which Andrew is not a believer in except as a psyops, but Blaine starts talking about the '200 generals' and 'the plan' and what he knows.

At 50:00 to 52:00 Blaine brings up Project Lookingglass and the 'frying' of those who have taken the vaccine when G6 is switched on in Europe.

At 52:00 up to the end - with some vaccine stuff at the every end - they finally get into the civil war to come in Ireland.
 
BTW: You can copy a video URL at the start point you want, by checking the "Start at" box when the "Share" panel opens. It seems to be working here for me most of the time. It doesn't hurt to mention it either — thanks !
I will try - it takes me a while. I've only just figured out - after months - how to do the quotes. I don't know where the 'Share' panel opens. ????
 
I will try - it takes me a while. I've only just figured out - after months - how to do the quotes. I don't know where the 'Share' panel opens. ????
On a PC ( I don't know about on a phone ).
The share panel opens in YouTube when you select the "Share" link below the video.
At the bottom of the panel is a checkbox that says, "Start at".
  1. Go to the point in the video where you want it to start.
  2. Select the share button.
  3. Check the "Start at" box.
  4. Select copy ( also in the panel )
  5. Then paste that into your post.
 
This is a relatively short video - only about 30 minutes - but well worth a listen - I think - for a lot of reasons, not just Fauci.

The Fauci DISTRACTION & What They're HIDING

Published August 7, 2026: [Video Run Time 35:20] Rich Does Politics Channel

TIMESTAMPS

00:00 The bioweapon labs, and the ex-MI6 man behind the Wuhan story
02:16 How the Wuhan lab theory started — and Dearlove's record
05:22 Fauci, AIDS and what PCR testing was really doing
06:24 The $4 million to Wuhan, and the map of Pentagon bio labs
08:12 What "no oversight" means — mosquitoes, ticks and Ukraine
10:10 Putin bad, Xi bad — the same formula sold to both sides
11:01 Anthrax, BioShield and the Unit 731 men America hired
13:06 What Russia and China said back in 2017
14:03 "Don't China and Russia have their own bio labs?"
14:53 Why do any of this? PNAC and pathogens built for genotypes
17:43 Racist eugenics, and where gain-of-function came from
18:32 Dark Winter: wargaming smallpox before 9/11
19:59 The Wuhan lab as the patsy
20:50 The military games in Wuhan and Event 201
22:32 Drones, aerosols and why China went to DEFCON 2
24:43 The virus that was never isolated
26:17 The flu relabelled, the intubations and the payments
28:15 The rules that made people weaker
29:39 The mystery illness in September 2019
31:07 Bill Gates's mosquitoes and blocking out the sun
32:50 Trump, Warp Speed and the CARES Act

 
"Dr. FAUCI allegedly told the mainstream media NOT TO PUBLISH the Wuhan Lab Leak Report, and ABC News CENSORED the story, hiding the truth from the public, while they gaslit you for years, lying straight to your face."

 
Even More Doubt About The Polio Vax

I started digging into the claim that the polio vax had "irradicated polio", and found the same misleading strategies that were used for COVID, including:
  • Bias created by conflicts of interest.
  • Numbers based on unverified "cases".
  • Ignoring polio vaccine injuries and deaths.
  • Date ranges that resulted in biased results.
  • The inclusion of cases with little or no symptoms.
  • Cases where the polio vaccine actually caused polio.
  • Misdiagnosing other causes with similar symptoms as "polio"
  • Not accounting for mutations of the polio virus over time.
  • Not including regions where the incidence of polio increased.
  • Ignoring that poilio was never actually "erradicated".
  • Leaps in logic backed by dubious statistical analysis.
  • Changes in the definition of polio.
The "New Normal" Already Happened

The more I dig into the vaccine story, the more it looks like the "New Normal" actually happened back in the 50s — some might ague even before that. Society has become so accustomed to being routinely vaxxed, that it simply doesn't question it — and anyone who does is branded a heretic. Essentially, we've all been living under a vax-cult delusion for over two centuries. Upon closer examination, the greatest scientific discovery of medicine looks increasingly like smoke and mirrors.
 
Last edited:
Even More Doubt About The Polio Vax

I started digging into the claim that the polio vax had "irradicated polio", and found the same misleading strategies that were used for COVID, including:
  • Bias created by conflicts of interest.
  • Numbers based on unverified "cases".
  • Ignoring polio vaccine injuries and deaths.
  • Date ranges that resulted in biased results.
  • The inclusion of cases with little or no symptoms.
  • Cases where the polio vaccine actually caused polio.
  • Misdiagnosing other causes with similar symptoms as "polio"
  • Not accounting for mutations of the polio virus over time.
  • Not including regions where the incidence of polio increased.
  • Ignoring that poilio was never actually "erradicated".
  • Leaps in logic backed by dubious statistical analysis.
  • Changes in the definition of polio.
The "New Normal" Already Happened

The more I dig into the vaccine story, the more it looks like the "New Normal" actually happened back in the 50s — some might ague even before that. Society has become so accustomed to being routinely vaxxed, that it simply doesn't question it — and anyone who does is branded a heretic. Essentially, we've all been living under a vax-cult delusion for over two centuries. Upon closer examination, the greatest scientific discovery of medicine looks increasingly like smoke and mirrors.
Let's not look for a cure for any illness then your mind will be at peace.
 
Honestly, these conspiracy posts about vaccines, Fauci, and a bunch of other stuff are utterly ridiculous. The internet is the world's biggest rumor mill. If you're really interested in accurate information about scientific research and data, there are a wealth of vettted research papers and documents one can refer too. It takes time and effort to read them and familiarize yourselves with the language and concepts of actual science. Are there spurious research papers? Sure. But the preponderance of scientific research is done by honest, serious, dedicated professionals who spend their lives learning and honing their research skills. But thanks to the anti-intellectual, anti-science administration these people are vilified and now Pulic Enemy No. 2, after the press designated Public Enemy No.1. But if you're so suspicious and paranoid that nothing seems legit to you except the postings of "Q" etc., then it's your choice. If you don't want to get / believe in vaccines, then don't. I've waded through enough of this conspiracy stuff to come to the conclusion that much of it is inane, but hey that's what works for me. I'm old so I don't care if anyone thinks I'm full of it. Don't mean to insult anyone, trying to wake y'all up and stop wasting your precious life down these dead end rabbit holes.
 
Back
Top