• NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

Congressional UFO Hearings Provide Few Answers


Looking for microbes on Mars is one thing.

Considering possible advanced alien intelligences being present on Earth is quite another.
Of course; the key difference is the potential impact of the latter on current society, so they have to keep it secret. But they most certainly are interested.
 
I listened to the hearing and there were some interesting tidbits. The military and intelligence services are looking at this from a national security lens which shouldn't be all that surprising. There was quite a bit of discussion that got deferred to the closed session, but some of the things that perked my ears up were:
-Protocols are now in place for reporting UAP by military aviators.
-Of the reported sightings, 18 UAP were identified as moving in ways that defied current technology.
-In a small number of UAP sightings, radio frequency energy or emissions were detected.
-There have been 11 documented near misses with UAP.
In addition, the working group stated they are working with the FAA and will be looking to bring in other appropriate federal agencies, like NASA. They made it pretty clear that outside groups like MUFON, Bigelow, etc., etc, won't be invited to the party because they have no control over the quality of data coming from sources outside of the military and other government agencies.
 
Watched 'US Congress Hearing on UAP' much what you should of expected still call them flying objects / UAP removes historical cases and trys to suggest it all USA which wrong. The Indian Government has its own UFO program as does Israel . Folks posting on Facebook false names and cases are just sad and the 'Wilson Document' rases it's online profile once again at US Congress all greyzone as MJ'12/13 . Roswell was legit event as Stan always spot on and excellent post by Mr John Greenewald Jr The Black Vault analysis is very good on US Congress Hearing as well his interview with Steven insightful . As said make your own mind up and put US Congress hearing in the greyzone the fiotage is just to gather responses from the community.
 
it sounds like a TV show "The Alien Grand Design " and US Congress stated the term "UNKNOWNS" means anything but Aliens which is a good point. All as US Congress said in the grey-zone is more Drones footage .... Keep a open mind and not throw out the baby with the bathtub -on all sightings as US Congress said.

Aston Rovers United.
 
Well they are certainly not little grey men from another planet.

You can't state that categorically. It is the most parsimonious view.

More likely to be inter dimensional or indeed a projection of our own consciousness.
Least likely. Projections from our consciousness don't leave landing traces etc. As for interdimensional, what other dimensions are even verified let alone shown to be habitable, to the point of giving rise to technical intelligences?
 
So the hearing - the part I like was asking for the comment on the nuclear site Maelstrom incident. The government saying that it was not something they looked into. Being asked to look into it and reluctantly saying yes that they would investigate. Can't wait for the next hearing to see what is said.
 
You can't state that categorically. It is the most parsimonious view.


Least likely. Projections from our consciousness don't leave landing traces etc. As for interdimensional, what other dimensions are even verified let alone shown to be habitable, to the point of giving rise to technical intelligences?
Yes I can state it with certainty, unless I'm talking to a nut case who should be locked up in a psychiatric ward
 
Reason based on what hard evidence? "Reports" won't cut it.

Besides reports of the confiscation of evidence, there remains plenty in the public domain such as landing traces. Not conclusive, necessarily, but the point is the idea of ET vessels isn't based just on human testimony.
 
Back
Top