• NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, 11 years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

Apollo 11 Fakery

Forums New posts

Free episodes:

Could the moon landings be fake , of course they could have been ,we have no real evidence that is the real story tho .Desperate people will carry out desperate acts , The moon landings were crucial so as to maintain American superiority and power over the russian bloc. People within the American state have been lieing for the last sixty years on the ufo question lieing is contagious and it spreads. Of course men did go to the moon after 1969 and there is no doubting that , But what did really happen in 1969, To me Nasa would have to have picked people who they knew they could trust, takeing Buzz Altrain for example, i believe him to be a liar when he is speaking during interviews on the ufo subject, He is never truthful only worrying about his reputation, he knows he saw something but he blames it on something that fell off a rocket When he clearly knows that was not the case. This to me says something about his character, Theories are they Could have been only in space orbiting the planet and later the hoax was put into action And made to look like later that they went to the moon, Or another possible scenario is as they approached the moon something went wrong so they made up a hoax This involved different Astronauts, Since we only see the suits not the people the audio could have been easily been recorded before they left and filming in black and white doesnt help with definition so as to arouse suspicion , this is all fiction of course or is it:question::question:
 
there was a cover up, the agreement was that the parkes relay station in australia was supposed to relay the moon landing direct to nasa who in turn would send it back for public broadcast to australia.

But........ someone somewhere put the wrong plug in the wrong socket... and australia saw the moon landings live , 2 mins BEFORE nasa did.

an american rocket, paid for by american ppl, with american pilots, and those damned oss-ees get to go down in history as the first ones to see man walk on the moon...........

the whole fake moon landing theory goes down the toilet when you know this little snippet of info. the australian scientists would have to have been in on the hoax.
 
Irishseekers said:
Could the moon landings be fake , of course they could have been ,we have no real evidence that is the real story do .Desperate people will carry out desperate acts , The moon landings were crucial so as to maintain American superiority and power over the russian bloc. People within the American state have been lieing for the last sixty years on the ufo question lieing is contagious and it spreads. Of course men did go to the moon after 1969 and there is no doubting that , But what did really happen in 1969, To me Nasa would have to have picked people who they knew they could trust, takeing Buzz Altrain for example, i believe him to be a liar when he is speaking during interviews on the ufo subject, He is never truthful only worrying about his reputation, he knows he saw something but he blames it on something that fell off a rocket When he clearly knows that was not the case. This to me says something about his character, Could they have been only in space orbiting the planet and later the hoax was put into action, And made to look like later that they went to the moon, Or another possible scenario is as they approached the moon something went wrong so they made up a hoax This involved different Astronauts, Since we only see the suits not the people the audio could have been easily been recorded before they left and filming in black and white doesnt help with definition so as to arouse suspicion , this is all fiction of course or is it:question::question:
Click to expand...

I dont mean to sound overly critical or cheeky but could you please use PARAGRAPHS when you post ? :D

A space after 3 or 4 sentances is better on the Eyes.

I find myself skipping your posts as it's normaly a humongous wall of text and this is unfortunate as you might be saying something interesting.

Sorry if I seem cheeky. :)
 
Live at the Witch Trials said:
I dont mean to sound overly critical or cheeky but could you please use PARAGRAPHS when you post ? :D

A space after 3 or 4 sentances is better on the Eyes.

I find myself skipping your posts as it's normaly a humongous wall of text and this is unfortunate as you might be saying something interesting.

Sorry if I seem cheeky. :)
Click to expand...
IF you werent cheeky already, you would not have siad it only joking:)
Ya i understand, It is a habit i have picked up in the last couple of years not sure why that is tho
 
The Soviets were watching the moon shots with great scrutiny. If they had any evidence, no matter how minute, that we had not made it to the moon in '69...They would have plastered the evidence all over the world.

Don't you think that the Soviets could tell that there were radio transmissions coming from the moon, rather than a movie lot somewhere in the desert southwest of the U.S.? Of course they could...as could every technologically sophisticated country on the planet.

The Soviets (and others) had radar, satellite, and spy evidence that we, in fact, did go to the moon.
 
Back
Top