Search results

You can't state that categorically. There are good grounds for believing the government knows a great deal more than the public.

That we laymen know of, or have seen. Frauds with a purpose i.e. disinformation agents. Ironically they're indirect confirmation of the phenomena. As the late Timothy Good wrote "..there would be no point in disinformation if there was nothing to cover up."

I never believed that theory. To cite just one problem with it, humanoids are usually associated with flying machines.

I've always doubted that very much.

You're referring to deletions, OK.

Moody wasn't banned for deletions. Biedney actually saw merit in some of what moody posted on Roswell. But he just couldn't stand the tone of Moody's posts. He was harsh about that and said "I'm banning you Lance."

He was on worse terms with Lance Moody whom he once banned. I didn't get along great either. Once, after I posted a point by point refutation of his ideas, he referred to me as "this dork" but said "I can't ban him …." Anyway RIP. Btw does anybody know the condition of skeptic CDA/Christopher...

Indeed present society and government wouldn't survive the revelation. But that doesn't mean we'll never know, just that disclosure must await a new system more receptive to reality. Control access yes and keep it from us, certainly. Right, not never but decades away IMO.

I just saw that. Good to see KDR is still alive and punching and his recent health problems haven't silenced him. :)

An idiotic idea. If UFOs were secret government devices, in the 76 years since '47 their extraordinary technology would've come into general use or more widespread use.

They may not be bad in the sense of wanting to do wrong or messing things up; unfortunately that's the result since their lack of intelligence leads to poor political choices that affect all of us.

They're obviously dumb to believe in Trump, to the point where they scatter rationality to the four winds. That a buffoon gets so much support is proof democracy is unworkable.

He's a clown and a demagogue. It speaks volumes about the stupidity of the electorate (and hence the viability of democracy, long-term) that somebody like that commands so much devotion. That said, I was glad to see him clobber Haley in the recent primaries. Haley has been called an "Israel...

What he'd tell is disinfo. I don't doubt ET material is covered up; you just can't trust putative "whistleblowers" to tell the truth about it. Secrecy involves more than just concealment. It also means misleading info.

Society isn't ready for the sort of "paradigm shift" resulting from a revelation of advanced ETs. The powers-that-be aren't concerned about exacerbating current issues; it goes deeper than that. What's at stake is nothing less than the ideological bedrock of present society.

Like so many others, Lazar was just a disinformation agent. It's unlikely anything he said has merit. To my knowledge the consensus is that there was. But what evidence is there for extremely short lived elements being the key to anything? Sure, to say that this or that is impossible on the...

Open acknowledgment of the phenomenon will, IMO, not occur prior to mid century. Maybe 2060-80. Not eons. In terms of basic scientific knowledge, we may be only decades away. The phenomenon may be unbeatable now, but it's not 1% as aggressive as it could be. The Alien Grand Design considers...

:rolleyes: Pseudohistory….. …used to assist coverup of aliens.

Maybe he'll get over it and come back. :)

I don't buy the article's claim that genuine info on aliens would've leaked out by now, or long ago. History shows the government is capable of keeping some secrets (its most important ones). To cite one example, it kept ULTRA secret not only during the war, when the necessity was most obvious...