Search results

Turkey UFO Incident - YouTube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H_P8j7NBpYg http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W25x-YQB-Jc

Darn it I missed it. Can you have him back soon?

Al Friky ----- the area 51 slogan Wooky or Bugs

Tim Frank Bubba Louise or Fred

The biggest story Kevin probably did was on the Lachezar Phillipov story. That should be on Youtube

Does anyone have any thoughts on Tom Van Flanderns work on the Face of Mars?

This is a great presentation by a scientific minded man who unfortunately is not still with us. But there are a few good points in this presentation were Tom describes the laws of science and logic in relation to the various objects on Mars. He does not go into the typical anomalies that...

In my opinion he is a drunk and alchoholic and not a government agent. He appears to be simply a liar and very similiar to what Phil Imbrogno was.

He is simply a faker. Not a disinfo agent imho.

TOTAL B.S. OR REAL? I HAVE NO IDEA PART 3 ALLEGED

Well Don hard to say, but with all the weird things going on it just would not suprise me at all. An L shaped object sounds very much like the Phoenix UFO of 1997, but hey it could be bull.

Congratulations

Whats going on around here in Dark Matter land? Yeah I know Don is writing a book with his wife but is there any word if he will return into this dimension from writing land if someone can pull him away from the word processor? Missed two weeks of DMR Fridays. Don't let that trend continue. I...

HA HA HA you made me laugh mate

Hello everyone, I very much recommend changing your forum theme to -->> Newest VB It is a much wider screen and gives you more room. The layout is much better. Just a tip

I heard there is a theory that this might be a chewbacca mask and the lips never move or stay open all the time

Debt up 1.59 Trillion under GOP house more in first 15 months than 97 congresses combined. Debt Up $1.59T Under GOP House—More in 15 Months Than First 97 Congresses Combined | CNS News

Common mistake made by debunkers. Randle has done a lifetime worth of solid research 99% of it good - 1% of it mistakes Debunkers do this: Throw out the 99% of solid research because 1% were mistakes does this make any sense?