Nearly everything you post is faith based and has nothing whatsoever to do with actual science.
I can only assume - from what you say here - that you have a unique definition of what 'actual science' is. But I am not here to argue that with you, nor to try to change your thinking. My disinterest in changing your thinking should be clear by this point. In fact, your blanket disregard for science makes it hard to take you seriously. The science speaks for itself.
YES climate change is occurring, it has to. That is how evolution happens.
Not that it gets anyone anywhere to so do (as demonstrated time-and-again on countless threads devoted to this topic) but doing a splice-and-dice of your rhetoric is sometimes hard to resist.
Climate Change does not 'have to' occur in order for 'evolution' to happen. Are you positing an 'intelligent design' when you say this? Meaning, are you positing that there is an end-game that an 'intelligence' is aiming for? If so, that is a scope that science itself does not pretend to encompass. (Conflating religious belief with the scientific approach is not helpful).
Adaptation is a process that takes place endlessly regardless of whether a micro-climate shifts, or there is a macro-climate shift.
If it never did we and all the life forms around us would not be here. To think the earth's climate should remain constant and never changing is to deny Mother Nature and her work.
The underlying religious/spiritual nature of your expressed sentiment is beyond the scope of science. I'm not sure any (current) scientist has posited that the 'earth's climate should remain constant and never changing'. It is scientific research itself that has demonstrated that the earth has had fluctuations in climate. It has been over a half century since science adhered to the idea of uniformitarianism.
There never has been a set temperature or climate for this awesome chaotic planet.
For human life there has been. The planet itself has gone through many fluctuations, and will doubtless go through many more on the cosmic scale of things. However, for human life there most definitely has been 'a set temperature or climate' for human existence. Outside of those parameters we have not existed, nor will we exist, unless we take matters into our own hands, as we are facing right now.
Please stop thinking you are so self important
I assume you mean not me personally but humankind as a whole. Why do you believe that humankind must not be held accountable for it's actions on the planet? Even migratory tribes understood their human impact on an environment. They made sure they moved their herds at regular intervals so that the grasslands could 'recover' from the human habitation. Humanity has always factored in it's impact on it's environment and adjusted accordingly - adapted accordingly - and where it could not, or did not, meant a civilization died. The scale of impact now is global.
that you should control normal functions of this planet.
The above is an example of why 'arguing' with you is pointless. Observation of the natural world should illustrate how profoundly we as humanity do indeed impact (control) the 'normal functions' of the environment (planet). Humanity is an integral (and significant) part of the whole, and when we fail to pay attention to how our actions impact that whole, we 'reap the whirlwind'. (e.g. Dust Bowl of the 1930's, etc.).
To re-state: Why are you so self-important (to the point of recklessness) that you think you are not to be held accountable for your actions on this planet? You are putting-off humanity's responsibility to some amorphous 'Mother Nature' who will - or is - 'managing' the world to some unclear 'evolutionary' end. That's head-in-the-sand thinking - as well as 'faith-based'. (I am aware that certain fundamentalist Christians believe that all this is part of the 'End Times' that will usher in Jesus' 'Second Coming' - so they have a vested interest in letting all this unfold without check).
Ha!
