• NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

Your Paracast Newsletter — May 31, 2015

Gene Steinberg

Forum Super Hero
Staff member
THE PARACAST NEWSLETTER
May 31, 2015
www.theparacast.com


The Paracast Continues to Explore Mysterious Phenomena at Skinwalker Ranch

The Paracast is heard Sundays from 3:00 AM until 6:00 AM Central Time on the GCN Radio Network and affiliates around the USA, the Boost Radio Network, the IRN Internet Radio Network, and online across the globe via download and on-demand streaming.

Announcing The Paracast+: We have another radio show, and for a low monthly or annual subscription fee, you will receive access to After The Paracast, plus a higher-quality version of The Paracast, without the network ads, and chat rooms. NEW! We’ve added an RSS feed for fast updates of the latest episodes, and The Paracast+ video channel is coming soon. For more information about our premium package, please visit: Introducing The Paracast+ | The Paracast — The Gold Standard of Paranormal Radio.

Attention U.S. Listeners: Help Us Bring The Paracast to Your City! In the summer of 2010, The Paracast joined the GCN radio network. This represented a huge step in bringing our show to a larger, mainstream audience. But we need your help to add additional affiliates to our growing network. Please ask one of your local talk stations if they are interested in carrying The Paracast. Feel free to contact us directly with the names of programming people we might be able to contact on your behalf. We can't do this alone, and if you succeed in convincing your local station to carry the show, we'll reward you with one of our special T-shirts, and other goodies. With your help, The Paracast can grow into one of the most popular paranormal shows on the planet!

Please Visit Our Online Store: You asked, and we answered. We are now taking orders for The Official Paracast T-Shirt and an expanded collection of other specially customized merchandise. To get your T-Shirt now featuring our brand new logo, just pay a visit to our online store at The Official Paracast Store to select your size and place your order. We also offer a complete lineup of other premium merchandise for your family, your friends and your business contacts.

About The Paracast: The Paracast covers a world beyond science, where UFOs, poltergeists and strange phenomena of all kinds have been reported by millions across the planet.

Set Up: The Paracast is a paranormal radio show that takes you on a journey to a world beyond science, where UFOs, poltergeists and strange phenomena of all kinds have been reported by millions. The Paracast seeks to shed light on the mysteries and complexities of our Universe and the secrets that surround us in our everyday lives.

Join long-time paranormal researcher Gene Steinberg, co-host and acclaimed field investigator Christopher O'Brien, and a panel of special guest experts and experiencers, as they explore the realms of the known and unknown. Listen each week to the great stories of the history of the paranormal field in the 20th and 21st centuries.

This Week's Episode: Researcher Ryan Skinner returns to The Paracast to talk about his two new books: Tales of the Skinwalker: Stories from Skinwalker Ranch and Skinwalker Ranch: The UFO Farm. As many of our listeners know, Ryan has made countless trips to the Uintah Basin where the infamous Skinwalker Ranch, scene of numerous paranormal events, is located. Over the years, he has collected quite a number of interesting accounts that seem to be centered in the area around the ranch. In his new books, he discusses many of the stories that didn't make it into the first two books and expands on his ongoing investigations into the mysteries in Utah.

Available exclusively to Paracast+ subscribers on May 31: Can you keep a good hoax down? Following through on this week’s issue of The Paracast Newsletter, Gene explains how old UFO hoaxes cannot to be killed. We frame that beginning to talk about the latest developments in Slidegate, where some of the promoters/participants are still attempting to spin this sorry episode as evidence that a real extraterrestrial body was recovered. The disclosure that the body was nothing more than the mummy of a small child clearly hasn’t stopped endless speculation about government conspiracies and other nonsense. Chris takes the occasion to apologize for criticizing two of the members of the Roswell Slides Research Group, which exposed the hoax. He also gives an update on a possible forthcoming revelation of the results of Ray Stanford’s longtime investigation into UFOs.

Chris O’Brien’s Site: Our Strange Planet

Reminder: Please don't forget to visit our famous Paracast Community Forums for the latest news/views/debates on all things paranormal: The Paracast Community Forums.

You Can’t Keep a Good Hoax Down
By Gene Steinberg

After flying saucers became a prominent fixture in our popular culture beginning in the late 1940s, it didn’t take long for people to claim they had actually met the pilots. Claimed contacts with space people often occurred in out-of-the-way places such as a desert. That ensured that few people – or no people – were around when the encounter supposedly took place.

So in one famous case, someone who ran a concession stand at the Palomar Observatory in Southern California, claimed to have met space people and, surprisingly, they looked very much like us, or at least one’s conception of what an ideal human being with so-called European features would look like.

George Adamski’s claims of meeting otherworldly beings, however, wasn’t the start of his career as figure in the UFO field. He actually claimed to have seen and taken flying saucer photos as early as 1947, and, by 1949, had begun to lecture on the subject. During those lectures, he claimed that all the planets in our solar system were inhabited, and that the Martian canals were artificial constructions.

In 1952, allegedly witnessed by five people, he met a blond haired being of medium height, wearing a shiny silvery uniform, in an out-of-the-way desert locale. Communicating via telepathy, Adamski learned that the visitor was named Orthon, and that he was an inhabitant of Venus.

So much for Adamski’s seriously flawed concept of astronomy and the surface conditions of our neighboring planets. I suppose he received his education on planetary conditions by watching such child-oriented sci-fi TV shows as “Captain Video,” and movies that conveyed similar misleading or naïve views of reality.

Indeed, when I first read about Orthon in Adamski’s 1952 best-selling book, “Flying Saucers Have Landed,” I wondered how much he was influenced by Klaatu (Michael Rennie), the alien protagonist in the classic sci-fi flick, “The Day the Earth Stood Still.” All right, Klaatu had short hair and was quite tall, at 6' 3½". But still!

On the surface, the story was nonsense. The flying saucer photos Adamski produced were laughable. But what about those alleged eyewitnesses? Well, it seems that maybe they were too far off to see anything significant, and there was some recanting of their stories later on, according to the famous “Adamski Expose Issue” of Jim Moseley’s Saucer News magazine.

For most people, Adamski’s contact claims were just some of the fanciful stories that arose in the early days of the UFO field. Indeed, I regarded it as little more than a curiosity until we interviewed UFO researcher Timothy Good on The Paracast on December 22, 2013.

Indeed, despite the very illogic of Adamski’s claim, the questionable evidence, and the lack of adherence to known science about surface conditions of nearby planets, Good believed the case lock stock and barrel, including those silly photos. Indeed, it has been pointed out on more than one occasion that the landing struts depicted in some of those photos were nothing more than common light bulbs. No I did not see a “GE” label on them.

This situation is not unique. While a number of UFO cases over the years have been exposed to be nothing more than mistakes or hoaxes, a good yearn gets repeated anyway, still taken seriously.

So there are those today who insist that the notorious alien autopsy film of the 1990s, from Ray Santilli, must have been genuine even though he admitted, during a TV interview in 2006, that it was just a “reconstruction.” In other words, a fake. All right, Santilli still insisted it was based on genuine footage that had mostly degraded beyond the ability to repair. That means the released film was a fake, but the source was real. The source, however, hasn’t been made available to image experts who are skilled at restoring film.

Excuses, excuses!

Then there’s this year’s notorious Slidegate episode, involving a pair of slides that allegedly depicted the corpse of an extraterrestrial lying on a glass table in what appeared to be a museum display. After more than two years of hype, independent researchers who got ahold of a high resolution scan of the slides were able to quickly interpret the contents of a placard at the right front of the body. Using software that deblurs, in effect sharpens a blurry image, it was clear it was nothing more than the mummy of a two-year-old child.

That should have ended the episode then and there, but not for the original promoters, including one Adam Dew, who makes film documentaries, and Mexico’s controversial UFO promoter, Jaime Maussan. To them, the manipulation of the slide was a fake, and the revelation that it belonged to an actual museum exhibit must be false as well, or a plant?

There were apologies from some of the key participants, including Roswell researchers Thomas Carey and Donald Schmitt. Indeed, Schmitt’s apology seemed heartfelt, and you almost felt sorry for him; that is until he apologized for his apology. So the placard was wrong and the body had too many anomalies to represent a human being, even one heavily deformed.

Yet another wacky claim I’ve since read online has it that the efforts to disprove this claim were all part of a government plot that somehow involved Adobe Systems, a civilian corporation that publishes such content creation apps as Photoshop.

The mind boggles!

Now let’s just suppose that the placard was misleadingly labeled for some unknown reason, that it was all a plot to reveal the existence of ET without actually revealing anything. But why? Why would anyone stick the body of an alien corpse in some obscure museum exhibit only to have it discovered by accident by someone checking out a box of slides found in the attic of someone’s home?

Wouldn’t it make a whole lot more sense to simply keep the evidence secret, if such evidence even exists?

And what about the potential danger of alien viruses? Why would anyone in government take the risk of allowing alien remains to be exhibited in public without proper safeguards? To what purpose?

To me, the promoters of Slidegate were sloppy. They evidently didn’t consider the real possibility that the whole thing would come crashing down as soon as researchers got ahold of high resolution scans and went about their work. If they truly wanted the placard not to be a factor, it would not have been terribly difficult to edit that portion of the image in Photoshop and remove evidence of its presence. A photo editing professional could handle that chore, with little or no evidence of the manipulation, for a fraction of the money spent to promote this mess.

Regardless, it goes to show that UFO hoaxes, good, bad or just ugly, often never die. There will always be someone who can find a way to make hay of it, even if the claim rides on quicksand.

Copyright 1999-2015 The Paracast LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Policy: Your personal information is safe with us. We will positively never give out your name and/or e-mail address to anybody else, and that's a promise!
 
After more than two years of hype, independent researchers who got ahold of a high resolution scan of the slides were able to quickly interpret the contents of a placard at the right front of the body. Using software that deblurs, in effect sharpens a blurry image, it was clear it was nothing more than the mummy of a two-year-old child.

It seems likely that if the most recent version of De-Blur software could sharpen the letters on the placard it could also be used to sharpen the image of the body in the glass box. Are any of the software experts in the RSRG group attempting to do this with De-Blur? If not, whyever not?


To me, the promoters of Slidegate were sloppy. They evidently didn’t consider the real possibility that the whole thing would come crashing down as soon as researchers got ahold of high resolution scans and went about their work. If they truly wanted the placard not to be a factor, it would not have been terribly difficult to edit that portion of the image in Photoshop and remove evidence of its presence. A photo editing professional could handle that chore, with little or no evidence of the manipulation, for a fraction of the money spent to promote this mess.

Good point, Gene. It rather suggests that the Roswell slides group were not involved in a hoax, does it not? And it provides some basis for thinking in terms of @George Wingfield's hypothesis that the Roswell slides group was manipulated from the beginning by others, such as Lundberg's own mirage men, experts in perception management. If that was the case, however, it seems likely to me that Adam Dew was not only aware of but complicit in the hoaxing.
 
In the end, having this entire thing come crashing down so quickly didn't serve the interests of the promoters. They were clearly tone deaf, or just didn't do due diligence. At this point, decoding the placard identifies the body as conventional, even if some people might claim there are anomalies in what is no doubt a heavy degraded set of remains. Do we need to know more except as an intellectual exercise? It's time to move past this.
 
the placard identifies the body as conventional

No, the placard identifies the body in the box as (probably) having at some time been housed and exhibited at the Mesa Verde museum. Pursuing the question of what is/was actually there in the glass box is not merely an "intellectual exercise." It represents a real question not yet adequately answered.
 
Last edited:
It's identified as the mummified body of a child. If that's not the case, maybe an anthropologist could examine the body, if still housed somewhere, to see what it might be. But not the photo. It would not be relevant to studying UFOs unless there was proof positive that the body itself was not of this earth. Even then, it would only present the possibility of such a visitation in the past, not the present.

Regardless, it would have nothing whatever to do with Roswell.
 
It's identified as the mummified body of a child. If that's not the case, maybe an anthropologist could examine the body, if still housed somewhere, to see what it might be. But not the photo. It would not be relevant to studying UFOs unless there was proof positive that the body itself was not of this earth. Even then, it would only present the possibility of such a visitation in the past, not the present.

Regardless, it would have nothing whatever to do with Roswell.

The body has been returned to the people (descendants of the people) from whom it was stolen and reburied at its original site. There's almost no chance that that body will be exhumed given the relevant federal law passed under the Clinton administration (actually an executive order of his that took effect before it was confirmed by Congress). Most people, including me, who follow developments in the Roswell slides case do not support the exhumation of that body. But if the mummy (probably) exhibited at the Mesa Verde museum was examined by forensic anthropologists while it was there, the recorded descriptions of that body might still be available in the museum's archives. That is certainly one of the purposes of David Rudiak's attempt to gain access to the archives. Isaac Koi has also sought access to those archives. In the meantime, I think we should call upon the RSRG group and others to apply the most recent version of De-Blur software to the best available digital enlargement of the body appearing in the Roswell slides.
 
Last edited:
The body isn't blurry, and the only real evidence of what it is would depend on any work done by forensic anthropologists. If such a report exists, I suppose it would be interesting to have access to it. If not, end of story.
 
It would not be relevant to studying UFOs unless there was proof positive that the body itself was not of this earth. Even then, it would only present the possibility of such a visitation in the past, not the present.

That would be significant enough, wouldn't it?

Regardless, it would have nothing whatever to do with Roswell.

It's possible that it might be connected to Roswell given the time and area in which the slides were photographed. A great deal depends on learning a) when and how that particular 'mummy' came into the possession of the Mesa Verde museum [so far apparently a matter of speculation], and b) what, if any, forensic examinations of the body were performed there, requiring access to reports by those examiners if they ever become available to researchers.
 
The body isn't blurry

Are you sure? I've read descriptions at Kevin Randles' site by Rudiak and others indicating that the image of the body is indeed blurred, postulated as the result of a movement of the camera perhaps caused by the photographer's arm having been jostled.
 
The pictures I've seen don't really look blurry, though they might be if blown up. Regardless, the real source of information is the results of hands-on examination.

The Roswell connection was never made, and there's barely a hint of it other than within a possible two-year timeframe. Besides, such a mummy would appear to be something far older.
 
The Roswell connection was never made, and there's barely a hint of it other than within a possible two-year timeframe. Besides, such a mummy would appear to be something far older.

I'd expect it to look older too if it is indeed the particular mummy stolen from its burial site in the first decade of the 20th century (as the story that's been adopted has it). As I recall, one of the forensic anthropologists who evaluated the slides for Mausson also commented on the mummy's lack of apparent age, speculating that it might have been preserved in formaldehyde.


Has anyone come up with another photograph of this 'mummy' obtained at the Mesa Verde museum (or elsewhere)? If not, and the Ray slide is the only image we have to contemplate, it's possible that the Ray slide is an intentional blurring of a better image found in that box of 400 slides or somewhere else. This could support @George Wingfield's hoax hypothesis if he could find out whether Lundberg or one of his associates found an original unblurred slide and blurred it, setting the whole Roswell slides investigation and resulting chaos in motion..

It's also possible that Dew obtained the slides by the means he has claimed and contacted Lundberg first, before contacting Carey, Schmitt, or Mausson. If he did contact Lundberg first, it might have been as a result of reading George's article concerning the alien autopsy film as a hoax involving Lundberg. Dew did say that after studying the slide he began to read Roswell research on the internet. Who knows who he contacted first?
 
Last edited:
A confession from the perception managers George has identified? That'll never happen.

Or do you mean a confession from Dew? A remote possibility, but most unlikely. Who's going to press him toward a confession?
 
More to the point who can press him? We can demand all we want, and he can say it was real. Unless he faced legal consequences, he wouldn't confess — and maybe not even then.
 
Back
Top