• NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

Your Paracast Newsletter — December 13, 2020


Gene Steinberg

Forum Super Hero
Staff member
The Paracast Newsletter
December 13, 2020
www.theparacast.com


UFOs Hovering Over Drive-in Theaters and Other Strange Events Revealed by Author/Investigator Preston Dennett on The Paracast!

The Paracast is heard Sundays from 3:00 AM until 6:00 AM Central Time on the GCN Radio Network and affiliates around the USA, the Boost Radio Network, the IRN Internet Radio Network, and online across the globe via download and on-demand streaming.

SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY A PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE AT A SPECIAL LOW PRICE! We have another radio show and we’d love for you listen to it. So for a low subscription fee, you will receive access to an exclusive podcast, After The Paracast, plus an enhanced version of The Paracast with the network ads removed, when you join The Paracast+. We also offer a special RSS feed for easy updates of the latest episodes on your device. Flash! For a limited time, you can save up to 40% on your subscription. Long-term susbcribers will receive a free coupon code for the James Fox UFO documentary "The Phenomenon," which includes 3 hours of extras, while supplies last. So act now! For the easiest signup ever, please visit: Choose Your Membership Upgrade

This Week's Episode: UFO researcher and author Preston Dennett visits Gene and Randall and brings with him a number of the sightings he's written about over the years. He focuses primarily on his 2020 book, "UFOs at the Drive-In" covering sightings by movie-watchers over the years in the U.S. Just imagine: you’re watching your favorite movie at the local drive-in theater when suddenly you see a strange flying object swoop down from above and hover right over the movie screen. The object is metallic, saucer-shaped, with portholes and colored lights, and is totally silent. It’s a UFO! Cars start honking and flashing their lights. People exit their cars, pointing and screaming. Some drive away in terror. Then the UFO starts to move around over the theater putting on a show that’s far more interesting than the movie itself! It may sound like science fiction, except it’s true! Preston is a field investigator for the Mutual UFO Network (MUFON), a ghost hunter, a paranormal researcher, and the author of more than 24 books and more than 100 articles about UFOs and the paranormal.

J. Randall Murphy's Ufology Society International: Ufology Society International (USI) - Explore the UFO Phenomenon

Preston Dennett's Blog: Preston Dennett

After The Paracast -- Available exclusively for Paracast+ subscribers on December 13: Gene and Randall present paranormal book author Preston Dennett for an interview that began on the December 13, 2020 episode of The Paracast. Preston talks about the possible presence of UFOs during the 1965 New York blackout, where millions of residents in eight states lost power for hours. What about possible reverse-engineering of alien technology, and is it possible that some inventions we take for granted have off-world origins? What about the fact that, when so-called alien beings appear to communicate with Earthlings, they never reveal anything in the way of advice or information that we don't already know? Preston began investigating UFOs and the paranormal in 1986 when he discovered that his family, friends and co-workers were having dramatic unexplained encounters. Since then, he has interviewed hundreds of witnesses and investigated a wide variety of paranormal phenomena.

Reminder: Please don't forget to visit our famous Paracast Community Forums for the latest news/views/debates on all things paranormal: The Paracast Community Forums. Check out our new YouTube channel at: https://www.youtube.com/c/TheOfficialParacastChannel

The UFO Entertainment Industry

By Gene Steinberg

As usual, anything said about the presumed behavior of UFOs must be based on a number of assumptions. So, if they are truly physical transport vehicles from other planets, we assume that they are being piloted by intelligent and logical beings that have motives that we surely can understand.

Let’s stick with that theory for the time being, since that’s what most people who believe UFOs are real are willing to accept. It’s also the easiest to explain; it gets more complicated when we enter the multiverse, collective unconscious, co-creation and other more exotic possibilities.

Well, exotic if we accept the extraterrestrial hypothesis as logical.

So consider that Earth has been visited by one or more alien races for decades, maybe centuries. If, as more and more scientists are willing to accept, there are likely loads of life-bearing planets out there in our galaxy — and beyond — there may be an uncounted number of them that have intelligent life. If some of the more advanced races choose to explore their galactic neighborhood and beyond, well, that’s why they are here.

If it’s just one alien species, why have they stuck around here for so long? Why do their aircraft appear to engage in the same sort of cat-and-mouse games for years on end without letup? Why do they continue to buzz aircraft, fly all-too-close to military installations and power plants, and hover above drive-in movie theaters, for example? Why do they kidnap unsuspecting Earthlings and transport them to their spaceships to undergo primitive physical experiments?

The assumption is, of course, that they are either friendly towards us, or just don’t care. The frightening possibility that they mean us harm appears less possible since there has been little evidence of any hostility. Or maybe there is.

Well, we have sent up airplanes that fire at them.

But one real problem is abductions. If they are indeed being done by ET, such actions are, by our definition of proper behavior, hostile. Consider of an Earthling flew above someone’s home, landed, entered that home and snatched one or more of the residents. Consider if it happened in a rural area somewhere, say near a forest or in a desert.

It doesn’t matter how it was done. If one of our people did it, it would be a felony by any definition of criminal behavior. Arrest and conviction could mean decades in prison. There are no excuses for acting in this fashion except for an act of war in which enemy combatants are captured.

So why accept such questionable behavior as proper because the offenders were born on other planets?

Besides, by any description of their motives for abductions, such as checking our DNA or engaging in some sort of generic experimentation, there is no need to behave in such an outrageous and perhaps frightening fashion.

An advanced alien race could probably acquire these samples or perform these experiments quietly, without causing physical or psychological pain. So DNA can be gathered from beverage cups and bottles, for example. Indeed, ET would do far better to just hang around dumpsters, and they could acquire a tremendous number of samples for their ongoing research into the local populace.

Hybrids? Well, perhaps they could recruit volunteers, and I’m sure there are plenty of people out there who’d be delighted to become the basis for one-half of a new, advanced race. Indeed, just asking for volunteers to submit genetic samples could also be accomplished without the pain or bother.

Yet scaring the living daylights out of the local populace appears to be normal behavior; that is, of course, if we assume that abductions are precisely as described.

Even then, it would seem the efforts to conceal the abduction, in which the victims — I will not call them subjects — are made to forget the encounters, are not being done in a terribly efficient way. Missing time events are recovered via hypnotic regression. Forgotten abductions sometimes provide hints of their occurrence via so-called “screen” memories involving huge owls with big eyes.

Frankly, I’m not terribly impressed with ET’s technology if they must resort to such silly games to hide their machinations.

Indeed, why are they seen, year after year, to perform the same maneuvers when Earthlings are present? You’d almost think that they are doing it not for reconnaissance but to entertain themselves or engage in some sort of psychological byplay that involves testing our reactions under different scenarios.

It has been suggested that we are being treated as little more than lab rats. So our visitors are just students who journey to primitive planets and manipulate the locals in order to learn how to deal with alien species when they graduate their educational institutions.

It’s not about what the UFOs are doing, therefore, but our reactions to their behavior that’s being observed.

Then again, why must this behavior be repeated year after year? Is it an educational process for the aliens as they observe — or manipulate — our civilization?

Certainly, if the aliens are here to exhort us to live a life of peace with respect to our environment. they are quite feckless. They never seem to engage in public contact with authorities — or cultural figures — who actually can influence human behavior. They never appear to provide any information that we don’t already know.

Sure, their technology, if what we are seeing represents the actual event, appears more advanced. But how much of it is genuine, and how much of it is an illusion presented for our edification, for their entertainment, or because we couldn’t otherwise accept their presence?

More to the point, how do we presume to even understand the behavior and motives of one or more extraterrestrial species? We evaluate logic in ways that we consider logical, and we attempt to put ourselves in their place, imagining how we’d explore another inhabited world populated by more primitive races.

A prime directive? Well, that would appear to involve not interfering with the local populace, right? But the mere act of being seen puts the lie to that.

The long and short is that, the mere act of trying to make logic about the presence of UFOs — if it’s indeed a physical presence — is itself presumptuous.

Copyright 1999-2020 The Paracast Company. All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Policy: Your personal information is safe with us. We will positively never give out your name and/or e-mail address to anybody else, and that's a promise!
 
As usual, anything said about the presumed behavior of UFOs must be based on a number of assumptions ... The long and short is that, the mere act of trying to make logic about the presence of UFOs — if it’s indeed a physical presence — is itself presumptuous.
As usual, a number of really good points. Perhaps however, there is some usefulness in trying to "make make logic about the presence of UFOs". So long as we are able to accept that we could be entirely wrong, then there's no presumptuousness. The problem is when people become so attached to their beliefs e.g. UFOs are transports from Hell, that they cannot weigh their belief against other possibilities.

But if we can look at the situation as objectively as possible, and come up with a general theory that correlates with the various facets of numerous accounts, then it would seem reasonable to deduce that such a theory is probably better than one that doesn't fit any of them. The reasoning there is that if that isn't the case, then whatever is behind the phenomena is making a concerted effort to confuse us about what they're doing.

As a consequence, if confusion is the aim, that indicates an intent to affect our behavior. On the other hand, if they aren't trying to confuse us, then the deliberateness of their actions means they are still trying to affect our behavior. So either way, there is an intent to affect our behavior, even if we aren't entirely sure what the end result of that intention is meant to be.

Given this situation, affecting our behavior is at the the root of their intentions. This serves as a foundation from which to develop a hypothetical model of their purpose. It may be the case that their intent is to get us to build a model of their intentions that corresponds to something other than their true nature, but if so, our behavior remains at the foundation of their interaction with us.

With this in mind, what sort of uses can knowledge about the behavior of a foreign species be used for? An early example of how we humans put animal behavior to use was in tracking their migration so as to be successful in the hunt. Today it's also used in conservation. I wonder where on that spectrum they may have pegged us?
 
Last edited:
This is something we can discuss endlessly. We take their presumed behavior and make assumptions about what they are doing and why. They could also be extraterrestrial performance artists, or those who visit us are not sane in the way that we consider sane.

And even if they told us, why believe them?
 
This is something we can discuss endlessly. We take their presumed behavior and make assumptions about what they are doing and why.
It's safe to say that people could always be making assumptions about why the aliens are doing what they do, but it's not always so safe to say we're making assumptions about what they are doing. For example, if a UFO makes itself visible and performs a series of maneuvers, then what it is doing is making a series of visible maneuvers. This sort of "what" needs to be kept separate from assumptions as to "why".

By keeping these concepts separate, the "what" part of the phenomenon becomes a solid foundation from which to build reasonable theories as to why they're doing what they're doing. We now have sufficient evidence from repeated types of "what behavior" to be reasonably certain that at least part of the "why" question has to do with eliciting behavior on our part.
They could also be extraterrestrial performance artists, or those who visit us are not sane in the way that we consider sane.
The theory on eliciting our behavior still applies to those hypothetical situations. Form there we can map out ways to look at whether or not their behavior is strictly theatrical or matches what we would consider mentally stable.
And even if they told us, why believe them?
Decades ago now, that question was an "Ah ha!" moment for me. The overwhelming nature of a UFO experience, particularly one of contact, could easily lead the experiencer to make a leap of faith, especially if they aren't well disciplined in asking critical questions, e.g. "What does God need with a starship?" - James T Kirk
 
Decades ago now, that question was an "Ah ha!" moment for me. The overwhelming nature of a UFO experience, particularly one of contact, could easily lead the experiencer to make a leap of faith, especially if they aren't well disciplined in asking critical questions, e.g. "What does God need with a starship?" - James T Kirk
A degrees of separation matter. So the movie, "Star Trek V: The Final Frontier," was directed by William Shatner. One of the stars, Laurence Luckinbill, who played Sybok, Spock's half-brother, is married to Lucie Arnaz, daughter of Lucille Ball. Lucille Ball, when she was head of Desilu, greenlit the original Star Trek series.

Shatner's excuse for the poor reception the film received is that Paramount sharply restricted the budget and other production factors, so he could not completely fulfill his vision.

But that line is a classic!
 
Back
Top