DFWMike said:
This question comes to mind after watching the crap that is fastwalkers. I have yet to see "The Phoenix lights", is that better? I'm open to whatever suggestions you guys may have to show my wife some that people are credible in this field(emphasis on some). I just bought Richard Dolan's book in Roswell, but I doubt she'll wade through all of that.
I have yet to see a decent credible documentary video. I have a video called "Crop Circles" which tries very hard to be credible on that subject. I think I got it from Freddy Silva's site or
http://www.cropcircleresearch.org .
As for books on UFO's, I like "The Secret Team" (forgot the author) and "The Hunt for Zero Point" by Nick Cook. Also, there's a book called "Out There" which does a good job of showing how there is definitely a coordinated effort to keep people from actually finding out solid answers. It's more of a book about the UFO community than finding answers, but it was done by a serious reporter trying to find answers, not someone with a particular agenda.
I can't separate UFO's into a specialized field anymore. Like Richard Dolan, I find too many connections to hidden politics. When you look into things like 9/11 and Iran/Contra ("Crossing the Rubicon" by Michael Ruppert and "The Conspirators" by Al Martin), and you already have an interest in UFOs, you start to see how the compartmentalization of information is just a symptom of the overall method of separating the information from the public. Black budgets, ignored agencies (very little is said about the NSA these days except people worried about their cell phone conversations with their shrink being private), illusory incompetence in government (come ON! the 'idiots' in government brought us stealth, the moon, the ISS, etc.), rigged elections, missing trillions of dollars, etc.
As Aaron MacGruder put it in the Boondocks comic: "All conspiracies lead to George Bush."
I haven't figured out if Cheney is a subset or a superset of that....
Blogs & Columns, Blog Directory - The Washington Post
Perhaps UFOs aren't really her interest. Maybe she can go at it from the political standpoint and sneak into the UFO subject from the back door instead. The simple secrecy concerning something that supposedly 'doesn't concern' the government ought to raise some flags with anyone. What if the subject was food distribution and contamination risks, and the government said "we're not concerned with that"; yet they are getting the state governments to force every single farmer to put a chip in every single animal, while refusing to allow independent meat packers to test every one of their animals for mad cow disease. WHASSUPWIDDAT?