<DIR><The following are quotes from study of the UFO footage from the Nellis Video.>
Their bewilderment at the unexpected appearance of the UFO is clearly audible. "What the hell is it?" one of them exclaims; "Where's it come from?" asks another.
The footage has been studied by both UFO researchers & aviation experts alike, but to date no-one has been able to provide an explanation as to what the object is, how it is propelled or how it is able to perform the manoeuvres it is seen to do.
A wavy line appears below the middle of the screen, whose appearance varies considerably throughout both sets of footage. This is probably the radar return or 'signature', which is used to help identify the nature of the target. He confirmed that there are hundreds of cameras on the range and that aircraft tracking and identification is done there on a daily basis. No-one who was present - not even the 'range control' - were able to identify the object.
Numerous researchers have commented that the object changes its shape from frame to frame, even appearing as a "fuzzy, gassy cloud" at one point. Many commentators have already established that the object comprises three or four 'bumps' or 'spheres' and a dark appendage, often described as being 'in the centre'.
it appears to 'inflate' from below, from inside to outside, so that by the end of the transformation the object appears very different to what it had been only a second previously.
Another rounded extension can be seen facing forward about half way up the object's body. This is probably the starboard lobe projection in a forward facing position. If this is a correct identification - as the model seems to suggest - then it implies that the port and starboard projections are capable of moving forward and downward, independently of each other.
In addition to its appearance and behaviour, some remarkable claims have been made about the object's performance capabilities, by both actual witnesses and later researchers. Among these are that the object "travelled 13 miles in six seconds", that "it moved very, very slow and then it moved very, very fast" and that "it did right angles [and] straight, horizontal climbs". During its "surveillance period", the object continues along its flight path, moving sideways for much of the time, and even backwards for eight seconds after 23:22:47.
The manner in which the Nellis UFO is seen to manoeuvre with 'confidence' suggests that it may have the ability to operate autonomously, i.e. with a built-in level of 'intelligence'. It may even have wandered out of bounds by its 'own' mistake. John Velez likened the Nellis UFO's behaviour to that of a fly, and this is certainly a good comparison when one examines its movement and the way it appears to respond to its environment.9 The physical and behavioural similarity to an insect has much in common with the new generation of 'micro-air robots', some of which are based on the principles of insect flight.
The structure of the Nellis object, on the other hand, is far removed from any known aircraft flying today. Its component parts appear flexible and they can activate very rapidly. Put in conventional terms, this 'aerial robot' appears to combine lighter-than-air technology with a unique form of vectored thrust.
< End of quotes >
If you ignore the craft and concentrate on the gases the craft is emitting you'll see a DIAGONAL pathway formed and the craft acting like a painter filling in the gap between the enclosure above it connecting with that below. Both assemblages of gases are connected and an electromagnetic force rotates around the axis(the craft)and a force from above fills the craft.
</DIR>Watch the rotation when it's within the range of 1:06:20 and 1:06:25?
I saw this once before...in 1954...a black rectangle descended and mixed and merged with a white carpet.
There are a lot of things in this video that haven't been brought out.
Did the radar freeze or was it put 'to sleep' by the intruding craft? The craft knew where the detection devices were.
The craft was doing a multiple number of things simultaneously:
1. It was disintergrating
2 It was adding 'marshmellow puff' appendages that moved in different directions and had navigational functions.
3. Its inside were coming out and extending the craft
4. Its shape changed constantly, both extending and contracting.
5. It was solid; it was gaseous.
Just to name the obvious.
It is commonplace to hear debunkers say that an unexplained UFO sighting is a black ops project.
Here are the words of a Nellis operator at the restricted range ( who put his job on the line for going on camera).
" This craft shows up. And it looks like its playing with kids. It looks like doing whatever they want. Bye now! That’s scary. It seemed to move in whatever direction they wanted to go, whenever they wanted to go; contrary to any craft I’ve seen."
A black ops program had been hijacked! The alien craft shows up briefly at the main stage of aerial technology and leaves observer’s pondering whether their common sense had been abducted.
