SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY A PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, five years young! For a low subscription fee, you will be able to download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive After The Paracast podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! FLASH! For a limited time, you can save up to 40% on your subscription. You can sign up right here!
I'm second guessing it. I don't assume they have a plasma around them at all.UFOs have plasma around themselves, there is no second guessing about that.
I disagree.Now, just this single detail is consistent with General Relativity. Because one of 24 differential equations in GR describes direct connection between gravity and magnetism.
Q & A: Gravity vs. Magnetism | Department of Physics | University of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignGravity and magnetism are not the same thing. In fact, they are completely separate forces. Gravity is a force that acts between any two objects with mass. No matter what they are made of, both objects get pulled towards each other just because they have mass. The reason it seems like gravity only pulls you towards the earth is because the earth is so big that the pull from you on it isn't enough to do much to its motion.
Unlike gravity, which occurs between any objects, magnetism depends on specific properties of objects. Magnetism can either pull the two objects together or push them apart, depending on which way the magnets point. Most importantly, it depends on what is going on with the electrons in the material, since each electron is like a tiny magnet itself. Most materials feel very little magnetic force because their electrons act like magnets that are pointing every which way, more or less equal numbers pulling or pushing.
Listen. I'm trying to help you in the sincerest way possible here. I want to crack their propulsion as much or more than anyone. And I think much of what you are saying might be right.I explained in detail in the previous post.
No. I'm sorry man, you're just plain wrong.1) Because in the wast majority of cases, at least 90% or more, UFO was hovering or moving, while EM effects were present. So, if EM is ON, gravity modification is ON. Opposite to that, if UFO had landed and engine is off, both EM and G effects stop. So the two effects always turn up together.
No. Again, there is no data set that supports this that I'm aware of. If I'm wrong, show it to me.2) Energy ratio of EM vs Gravitation is enormous. G-effects are limited to immediate vicinity of the craft itself, while EM effects span for miles. That implies that UFOs need lots of EM energy to produce relatively little G energy. There is no point putting heavy EM generator on a lightweight craft, if EM has no role to play in propulsion.
Number one, in my opinion Stanford is full of crap, full stop. And I say that with 100% respect to Chris who believes otherwise. Why? Because if he knew what he actually knew, he'd either be incredibly rich, or incredibly dead. He has no idea how their propulsion works, and no data to demonstrate it. He's never going to show it. And I say that secretly hoping I'm wrong. But every day that goes by makes me believe it even more.Stanford measured three data streams: Electric, Magnetic and Gravitational. Stanford did release one graph showing EM vs G. As well, in his Paracast interview Stanford specifically said that EM and G effects are correlated in his data. He verbally described the correlation.
You can't keep saying that. You're making an *assumption* the plasma is there. You can't prove it is. For the same reason we can't even prove that they're intelligent, or guided, or even there.Plasma is constant companion of UFOs. But it is managed according to the flight regime. If UFO is high up in the atmosphere or moving fast, than plasma is on. If UFO is close to the ground, than plasma is off. Plasma is easy to manage, just turn voltage up or down, or on and off. So plasma would create no problems.
Einstein was never able to unify EM and gravity. We do not have a grand unified theory that incorporates both.Nobody said that magnetism and gravity are the same. I said that they have relationship in GR. You can not agree or disagree with relationship between magnetism and gravity in General Relativity, because equation is just there in Einstein's work.
I'm 100% with you there.In UFOs context University of Illinois quote is just a special case. UFOs know something we don't, otherwise they wouldn't be flying.
I actually did this somewhere on this forum. Turns out, you'd need the gravitational effect of a small asteroid or something to hang something in the air.It is relatively easy to work out UFO's EM energy output. All you need is an estimate distance from UFO and field strength. Bruce MacAbiee made several such approximations. Gravitational energy, as well, can be approximated with relative ease. One just needs estimate of UFO's weight (from ground imprints) and acceleration (say from readings on the radar). Anybody who knows relevant equations can do it. Although these would be just estimates, they would provide a good starting point.
"Small asteroid" ... Excellent, that is not much of requirement.I actually did this somewhere on this forum. Turns out, you'd need the gravitational effect of a small asteroid or something to hang something in the air.
If we assume that UFOs exist, than some of GR equations most certainly are amiss. Most likely it is just one or two equations in GR, or maybe just one term.The energy it would take to distort it was measurable in seconds of energy output by the sun or something. A lot, in other words.
Now this is extremely interesting. Not just interesting, It is phenomenal.The other problem is that it would cause a distortion spherical in shape above the object (so the object was falling up at the same rate it was falling down). So stuff above the object would get pulled downward.
You have tendency to see problems where there are obvious solutions. Sky is a big place, one can easily fit aircraft and UFO close enough without them affecting each other. There was a case in Australia, where UFO flew above small Cesna aircraft and caused crash. But its more likely it was caused by interruption of the engine. There is a video of a basketball size UFO, possibly drone, flies around Concord. Small UFO, big plane, and everything is ok.In other words, UFOs flying under aircraft would likely destroy them. It would also cause a significant downdraft in the air above it, which isn't seen.
We are getting there.Lots of problems.
I have a feeling that a Submarines conning tower is specifically designed to make as little "disturbance" to the water as possible, for reasons of "stealth".When a conning tower of normal submarine comes out, water immediately splashes to the side and conning tower comes out without any thick water envelope.
Something to ponder: Why the bluish glow reported around many UFOs?
CO2 dissipates its energy by collision and transfer processes that are broadened by rotational motions to create a blue background emission. You can see the background in this spectrum ( graph below ) for example, along with lesser contributions from Swan bands.
Rotating magnetic field is the most popular guess. Many people who like to think about this subject have suggested that idea. Nazi Bell, Podklednov and Searl have certainly pointed in that direction.The question is what is the other part that affects gravity? My hunch is that it has something to do with the movement of the EM field. The levitation of the superconducting magnet ( experiment alluded to earlier ) didn't show signs of gravitational variance until the disk was rotated at high speed. However, my proposal would be that rather than rotating the disk ( magnet ) itself, simply rotate the field instead. This could be accomplished by high-speed electronic switching. Such technology is already in use in some electric motors. This approach would reduce the energy requirement substantially.
I'll mention here that although a connection between EM fields and gravity has not been firmly established, it has been a long sought scientific quest to unite these forces, and therefore I think it can be safely assumed that simply because we haven't unified the them yet doesn't mean there isn't some way to do it, and if rotating the field has something to do with it, then the math would have to consider temporal factors, which sort-of points us back to Einstein's spacetime model. So the formula would work out to something like: Effect on gravity = strength of EM field in some relation to it's movement through time. And of course this movement would need to be circular in order to facilitate the suspension of a fixed object within the field.
My guess is that temperature and air purity have something to do with the color. The more clean the air and hotter the temperature, the more to the blue spectrum the color will be. Lower temperatures combined with smog or particulate will be more orange. This also implies that the more bluish, to white the color is, the more energy is being applied to the field. Not all reports however include this coronal type effect. It seems to be something that the craft can manipulate at will, perhaps to confuse radar or perhaps as a byproduct of propulsion maintenance. I don't know. It's all conjecture based on what little we know. I like to think it's still possible for some tinkerer to stumble upon the secret while playing in his garage .... Do you have any idea, can air produce orange plasma at some voltage? Is that possibly Nitrogen? ...
You are onto something here. It might be something to do with humidity. I have an impression that lots of Orange Globes are seen in Florida and they would have a very humid air there. There must be a vertical change in the distribution of humidity in the air. Like closer to the ground air is very humid and higher up it gets drier. So low flying UFOs, surrounded by humid air and smog, would glow orange and when they go higher up, they glow white-bluish because air is colder and dryer.... Lower temperatures combined with smog or particulate will be more orange. This also implies that the more bluish, to white the color is, the more energy is being applied to the field. ... .
From all the accounts, plasma around UFOs is a transient phenomenon. Sometimes UFO are visible on the radar, sometimes they are not. Plasma is mostly connected with a flight mode UFOs are in: speeding about, hovering, getting ready to move on, etc. Almost as if they have a gearbox: neutral, 1st gear, 2nd gear etc. I don't think they are worried by radars too much, because UFOs had been clocked flying at a steady 15,000 km/h (about 1,000 miles/hour) and the majority of our missiles are flying around 2,000-3,5000 miles/hour. UFO can easily outpace any missile.... Not all reports however include this coronal type effect. It seems to be something that the craft can manipulate at will, perhaps to confuse radar or perhaps as a byproduct of propulsion maintenance. I don't know. It's all conjecture based on what little we know. ... .
I think you're onto something there, but actual shape shifting isn't required. All that is required is sufficiently advanced active camouflage, and our own technology is in the early stages of that already. So it's more like Star Trek than Star Wars. In Star Trek cloaking and holographic illusions are used several times to confuse adversaries. There's no need to invoke alternate dimensions ( as Vallée did to promote his book ) or even mind manipulation, although at least unlike alternate dimensions, mind manipulation is at least possible.I have seen what appears to be a shape & then like an Octopus, it changes. The shape shifts are like re shaping one's fist in Rock ..Paper...scissors !Same hand! If we are dealing with a living spaceship it re shapes but remains the same. Other smaller objects again are shaped rather than having things like running boards! We are dealing with more than one unknown. We have a pre conceived notion that spacecraft are like star wars! Conditioning is at work. I believe that the powers to be promote this to keep us looking away from the strange crafts we do see on videos & in our skies. UFOs that hide in plain site!