• NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

The Pentagon UAP Studies: At Last the Other Shoe

Free episodes:

SO if the DOD are trying to pass things off as terrestrial and some incidents are enemy spy drones/craft, and if they do not want to give away that they can see them watching us but do not want them to know that we know they can see us .............

Explain Malmstrom base incident where the Nuclear Missiles were reported to have been disabled.

The handpicked the 144 or so incidents for the report but they agreed to look into the Malmstrom incident.
for the younger amongst you here is a link about the Malmstrom incident - Malmstrom AFB Missile/UFO Incident, March 1967
Hopefully congress can pin the DoD to the post on this one and not, as implied by the report lead us into a debunking trap using the incidents THEY chose.
One more update:

The current name for the project is worse than ever.
This article might present a problem for some of you, since The New York Times has a paywall. But you can always delete the cookies in your browser, and it should work for most of you.

The announcement that this measure is bi-partisan is significant in what it means:

Of course, that doesn't mean they will get all the records, but at least some if it is approved, passes the House and is signed by the President.
Thank you Gene for your posts - we have to keep the topic being discussed. Try to bring it up in regular conversations with those that normally don't discuss this topic. 'Did you know there was a congress hearing, apparently someone is on public record that the military have UAP's. Oh UAP stands for ....... and , on record they have the bodies of pilots of non human origin, what is that about . Oh you can see for yourself the hearing , its on you tube....'
Once again thank you Gene for having this forum , the podcasts, and a great platform for your guests.
Came across this interesting article delivered one day (8/25/2023) to the UAP congressional hearing (8/26/2023) from good old RAND
UFO-type sightings happen more often near military airspace
Its not pro extraterrestrial
The researchers for the report used that data to answer two questions at the heart of the report: where in the US are people likely to report such sightings, and what factors predict where people are more or less likely to report UAP sightings?
But I agree there needs to be a method of reporting strange occurrences both military and civilian. It would also be advantages if all the data was compatible and could be sifted by a single database engine , hooked up to machine learning /AI capabilities to identify patterns.
Let me know what you think