Eddy Pengelly
Skilled Investigator
Paper 1 Results
1. Searching Ancient Texts for Evidence of Time Travellers
The traditional meaning and concept of particular “angels” in the Bible were found to be incorrect. Consulting the Hebrew Lexicon in Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance for the word “angel” revealed that in ancient times that emotive word simply meant ‘a human male’ and did not originally have a supernatural context.
Some particular human males (angels) in the Bible were reported as giving ‘future information’ to ancient people. In some accounts where the term “angel” was not directly used to report the associated event, simply ‘elders’ or ‘a man’ was said to be present.
Six of the eight texts examined herein documented such a human male as being present. Three of those texts, from three different times and from three different countries, named the same human male as “Gabriel”.
Of five potentially named time travellers investigated, three failed validation due to no supportive evidence (Ezekiel, Daniel and John, the Bible), one was rejected due to inconclusive associated proof (Moroni, the Book of Mormon), and the last with supportive evidence, Gabriel (Old Testament, New Testament, and Qur’an), gave a positive result.
In this paper a male human time traveller (named or un-named) was referred to as ‘a visitor’.
Prescient content was defined as “descriptions of future events in ancient texts and, descriptions of future technology in ancient manuscripts or in other ancient works”.
Section 4 summarized a comprehensive Search Criterion containing thirty separate attributes. It included key points such as the text itself, the writer of that text, whether a visitor was reported as being present, did that visitor tell of future events, was any prescient content documented by the writer, and can that prescient content be exactly matched to actual historical events.
Selected ancient texts were first subjected to validation regarding the historical person, the text, and the visitor.
Texts examined that failed search criterion validation were:
Gospel of Luke (New Testament);
and (from the Old Testament) Hosea, Joel, Amos, Obadiah, Jonah, Micah, Nahum, Habakkuk, Zephaniah, Haggai, Malachi, Isaiah, Jeremiah, Zechariah and Ezekiel;
and The Book of Mormon.
Texts that passed validation: The Qur'an, Nostradamus, Daniel and Revelation.
Next, those four texts were subjected to prescient content validation.
The Qur’an failed at this point, and was eliminated from the study.
The other three passed validation, and specific verses extracted from them were:
Nostradamus, Century 1 Quatrain 81.
Daniel 7:23-25, 9:24-25, 9:26-27 and 11:40-45.
Revelation 9:2-11.
Their extracted and compiled prescient content was then checked to history books.
Nostradamus, Century 1 Quatrain 81
12 out of 12 descriptions matched to a recorded modern historical event.
Daniel 7:23-25
12 out of 12 descriptions matched to recorded modern historical events and activities.
Daniel 9:24-25
10 attributes matched 10 descriptions of actual historical events that culminated in a modern person named Michael being identified.
Daniel 9:26a
4 out of 4 descriptions matched to recorded modern historical events involving the named and identified modern person Michael.
Daniel 9:26b-27
A negative result was declared. An attempt to match over 20 descriptions to modern historical events was not conducted, as a start date was not included in the original text.
Daniel 11:40-45
29 out of 29 descriptions matched to the activities and characteristics of the 1990/1991 Persian Gulf War. This datable historical event supplied the general time frame for when the identified Michael commenced his activities (Daniel 12:1).
Revelation 9:2-11
26 out of 26 descriptions matched to activities and characteristics of the 1990/1991 Persian Gulf War.
During the several validation stages, other individual positive outcomes were attained for certain parts of the search criterion. A table of results for all thirty search criterion components for the eight main texts examined can be found in the Tables section.
These were the FINDINGS from Paper 1.
Link to download Papers 1, 2 & 3
1. Searching Ancient Texts for Evidence of Time Travellers
The traditional meaning and concept of particular “angels” in the Bible were found to be incorrect. Consulting the Hebrew Lexicon in Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance for the word “angel” revealed that in ancient times that emotive word simply meant ‘a human male’ and did not originally have a supernatural context.
Some particular human males (angels) in the Bible were reported as giving ‘future information’ to ancient people. In some accounts where the term “angel” was not directly used to report the associated event, simply ‘elders’ or ‘a man’ was said to be present.
Six of the eight texts examined herein documented such a human male as being present. Three of those texts, from three different times and from three different countries, named the same human male as “Gabriel”.
Of five potentially named time travellers investigated, three failed validation due to no supportive evidence (Ezekiel, Daniel and John, the Bible), one was rejected due to inconclusive associated proof (Moroni, the Book of Mormon), and the last with supportive evidence, Gabriel (Old Testament, New Testament, and Qur’an), gave a positive result.
In this paper a male human time traveller (named or un-named) was referred to as ‘a visitor’.
Prescient content was defined as “descriptions of future events in ancient texts and, descriptions of future technology in ancient manuscripts or in other ancient works”.
Section 4 summarized a comprehensive Search Criterion containing thirty separate attributes. It included key points such as the text itself, the writer of that text, whether a visitor was reported as being present, did that visitor tell of future events, was any prescient content documented by the writer, and can that prescient content be exactly matched to actual historical events.
Selected ancient texts were first subjected to validation regarding the historical person, the text, and the visitor.
Texts examined that failed search criterion validation were:
Gospel of Luke (New Testament);
and (from the Old Testament) Hosea, Joel, Amos, Obadiah, Jonah, Micah, Nahum, Habakkuk, Zephaniah, Haggai, Malachi, Isaiah, Jeremiah, Zechariah and Ezekiel;
and The Book of Mormon.
Texts that passed validation: The Qur'an, Nostradamus, Daniel and Revelation.
Next, those four texts were subjected to prescient content validation.
The Qur’an failed at this point, and was eliminated from the study.
The other three passed validation, and specific verses extracted from them were:
Nostradamus, Century 1 Quatrain 81.
Daniel 7:23-25, 9:24-25, 9:26-27 and 11:40-45.
Revelation 9:2-11.
Their extracted and compiled prescient content was then checked to history books.
Nostradamus, Century 1 Quatrain 81
12 out of 12 descriptions matched to a recorded modern historical event.
Daniel 7:23-25
12 out of 12 descriptions matched to recorded modern historical events and activities.
Daniel 9:24-25
10 attributes matched 10 descriptions of actual historical events that culminated in a modern person named Michael being identified.
Daniel 9:26a
4 out of 4 descriptions matched to recorded modern historical events involving the named and identified modern person Michael.
Daniel 9:26b-27
A negative result was declared. An attempt to match over 20 descriptions to modern historical events was not conducted, as a start date was not included in the original text.
Daniel 11:40-45
29 out of 29 descriptions matched to the activities and characteristics of the 1990/1991 Persian Gulf War. This datable historical event supplied the general time frame for when the identified Michael commenced his activities (Daniel 12:1).
Revelation 9:2-11
26 out of 26 descriptions matched to activities and characteristics of the 1990/1991 Persian Gulf War.
During the several validation stages, other individual positive outcomes were attained for certain parts of the search criterion. A table of results for all thirty search criterion components for the eight main texts examined can be found in the Tables section.
These were the FINDINGS from Paper 1.
Link to download Papers 1, 2 & 3
