The Pegg Project® Time Travel academic PAPERS

[Eddy Pengelly]

Greetings from Australia. These papers contain my investigations into certain TIME TRAVEL claims made by Australian researcher Ronald Pegg.
Each post presents a specific topic, its full abstract statement, plus a link to its associated Paper so members can then individually scrutinize each for themselves.

3 papers are on general Time Travel Proof, with 4 Case Studies - and will be posted over the next two weeks.
Individually Download the free Preprint PAPERs and examine Time Travel Back-to-the-Past evidence for yourself.

 

[Eddy Pengelly]

1. Searching Ancient Texts for Evidence of Time Travellers

Abstract
Television shows and movies about time travel fascinate many people and often generate questions such as whether time travel is possible and, has it actually occurred.

Here a search for ‘evidence of time travel back to the past’ in historical records in the era prior to the internet age was undertaken.

The objectives were to construct a basis of analysis, locate ancient texts within the search criterion, then examine those selected ancient texts for the presence of time travellers and/or associated prescient content.

The aim was to answer the question “do ancient texts document time travellers from the future?”

For a result to be validated as positive, an ancient text had to relate that a person from the future was physically present and he described specific future events that can now be verified from contemporary history books.

Several texts were found that do in fact document time travellers from the future and contain associated prescient content. A named human time traveller was also identified.
These positive results reveal that time travel back to the past has taken place. This new knowledge will induce a whole new sphere of study and precipitate a change in thinking both in the scientific and religious worlds.

Link to Download Papers 1, 2 & 3 can be found in the Paper #3 post.

 

[Eddy Pengelly]

2. Searching Ancient Texts for Evidence of Computer Technology

Abstract
It was established, by the South Australian researcher Eddy Pengelly in his March/June 2014 Paper, that time travellers went back to the past to many different times and to different countries, and told certain ancient persons of specific future events.
Associated with those ancient reports are descriptions of an apparatus and two artifacts.

Here a search to establish the identity of those devices was undertaken.
The objectives were to:
collate a list of ancient texts that contain descriptions of the apparatus and artifacts;
compile an extraction of attributes;
filter out any mistranslations; and
then compare those descriptions to known technology in an attempt to identify what was seen back in the past.

To confirm the identity of the apparatus and artifacts and to generate a positive result, an exact match of described ancient attributes to any such actual technology was required.

A mid 1990s desktop computer was identified as the apparatus, and compact disks as the artifacts.

These positive results demonstrate that particular computer technology was taken back to the past and shown to certain historical people.

A new term was introduced for these findings - DOOPArt, an acronym for ‘documented-out-of-place artifact’.

This new knowledge will instigate a whole new sphere of study and continue to precipitate a change in thinking both in the scientific and religious worlds.

Link to Download Papers 1, 2 & 3 can be found in the Paper #3 post.

 

[Eddy Pengelly]

3. Compact Disk documented in Ancient Texts is Identified

Abstract
It was established, by the South Australian researcher Eddy Pengelly in his October 2014 Paper, that a mid 1990s computer system and two associated compact disks are documented in certain ancient texts.

Here a search to establish the identity of one of those compact disks was undertaken.
The objectives were to:
collate a list of ancient texts that contain accounts of compact disks;
extract and compile a list of their characteristics and described contents from those ancient texts;
filter out any mistranslations; and
then compare those features to particular compact disks in an attempt to find the one described in those ancient texts.

To confirm its identity and to generate a positive result, an exact match of documented ancient characteristics and described content with the actual contents of a single cd-rom was required.

The 1995 French produced multimedia cd-rom entitled Ancient Civilizations of the Mediterranean was comprehensively identified.

This positive result demonstrates that a particular cd-rom from the mid 1990s was taken back to the past and shown to certain historical people.

This disclosure will continue to provoke a change in thinking in the scientific world regarding the topic of time travel, and will finally and comprehensively reveal to Religions upon what their traditional stories are actually based.

Link to download Papers 1, 2 & 3

 

[Tim Swartz]

Thank you for this. I'm looking forward to reading what you have submitted.

 

[Burnt State]

Not only should this make a fascinating read but I'm also really interested in understanding how CD-ROMs from the 90's got replayed back in the past, and whether or not Milli Vanilli was loved or hated in the olden days.

 

[Burnt State]

I can't say I did a thorough read of all three documents but I did find the parsing out of words such as "breastplate" from ancient texts to mean CD-ROM, or similar technological objects, to be the product of a fanciful mind at best. I was really hoping for some interesting and somewhat compelling time travel takes, and instead I got wayward dictionary flamboyance.

I think the value of these papers is best captured by the notion that a CD-ROM from 1995 about ancient civilizations went back into the past to tell them about themselves in the present. Perhaps if they were telling ancient civilizations about the fact the Milli Vanilli lip-synched all their tunes, then there would at least be some meat on the bone.

A book is a book and a breastplate is a breastplate and a throne is a throne. It's not an ancient computer with a cdrom being played back by a time traveler with what - a portable solar powered generator from Costco? I missed that part in the hieroglyphics and Moses's stone tablets translations.

 

[SRL+]

In totality and as interesting as it sounds, what comes into mind is some type of AI chatbot which has run amuck.

 

[Eddy Pengelly]

Not doing a thorough read means that people miss many important precedents and individual discoveries.
This is obviously evident by your confession and subsequent misinformed comment of

I can't say I did a thorough read of all three documents but I did find the parsing out of words such as "breastplate" from ancient texts to mean CD-ROM, or similar technological objects, to be the product of a fanciful mind at best.

The paper does NOT say that a breastplate = a CD-ROM.

Using the original Hebrew meaning (from the Lexicon in Strong's Concordance) and following the etymology of the two words that make up the word 'breast-plate', derived the overall context of a “breastplate” being an object that is ‘flat, smooth, and pounded thin, that has a large circle with a protruding nipple within a smaller raised circle, and is like a pocket that contains something’. (For full explanation see Paper #2, page 208)
This is describing the central raised pins in a base-plate of a plastic jewel case (that is a pocket for a cd-rom).

I missed that part in the hieroglyphics and Moses's stone tablets translations.

Evidence that "Egyptian glyphs depict computer technolgy" will be presented via the next paper post.

 

[Eddy Pengelly]

I'm also really interested in understanding how CD-ROMs from the 90's got replayed back in the past,

Over 30 ancient texts document human time travel encounters where the cd-roms have been reported and documented throughout the past.
Links to a series of informational Videos on this topic are available on this formaun via The Pegg Project® News Seminar VIDEOS

 

[Burnt State]

Over 30 ancient texts document human time travel encounters where the cd-roms have been reported and documented throughout the past.
Links to a series of informational Videos on this topic are available on this formaun via The Pegg Project® News Seminar VIDEOS

What is proven is the capacity for all ancient texts to be used like a painters palette to make any picture they might desire. Language, by nature, is a self-referential tool, and when you have a vast collection of symbols and images to create a narrative it lands itself to varying interpretations. Excerpts used out of context make it even easier to make whatever argument you like.

Just look at how language has been weaponized in our current era and the meanings of words like freedom and truth, for example, have had their meanings inverted or contorted. But you're certain that a specific French CD-ROM was played back in ancient times based on interpretations of ancient imagistic languages? The way the words 'probable' and 'proven' get used in the papers have not convinced me of any concrete proofs for this time travel hypothesis.

 

[SRL+]

When jumping into the way back machine with their CD-ROM, did these folks drag along a Macintosh Performa 5200 with them?

 

[Eddy Pengelly]

When jumping into the way back machine with their CD-ROM, did these folks drag along a Macintosh Performa 5200 with them?

No, not a Mac. The computer utilized, as confirmed by specific computer parts being depicted by an Egyptian scribe (eg. mouse & cable; dating it to early 1990s), was similar to a 386/486 Desktop PC.

The papers only reference a handfull of examples, whereas the cd-roms and the specific computer have been reported and documented in over 30 ancient narratives.
My DOOPArt report reveals 35 accounts where ancient people have either depicted, described, or documented encounters with the cd-roms + computer.
Link to report: Documented-Out-Of-Place-ARTifact

Some of this plus other information is presented in this video

 

[SRL+]

No, not a Mac. The computer utilized, as confirmed by specific computer parts being depicted by an Egyptian scribe (eg. mouse & cable; dating it to early 1990s), was similar to a 386/486 Desktop PC.

The papers only reference a handfull of examples, whereas the cd-roms and the specific computer have been reported and documented in over 30 ancient narratives.
My DOOPArt report reveals 35 accounts where ancient people have either depicted, described, or documented encounters with the cd-roms + computer.
Link to report: Documented-Out-Of-Place-ARTifact

Some of this plus other information is presented in this video

Hmm… why did these time travelers decide to take something created in 1986 back to the past when they could have taken something which was state of the art in 1995? BTW, was the Compaq Deskpro 386 solar powered?

 

[SRL+]

Just to point out that you stated:

This positive result demonstrates that a particular cd-rom from the mid 1990s was taken back to the past and shown to certain historical people.

... and then you stated:

No, not a Mac. The computer utilized, as confirmed by specific computer parts being depicted by an Egyptian scribe (eg. mouse & cable; dating it to early 1990s), was similar to a 386/486 Desktop PC

Apparently, you're not quite sure of your facts.

 

[SRL+]

Wouldn't this be better suited for time travel? It even boasts a battery!

Toshiba T3200

1992

One of the first laptops with a built-in CD-ROM drive, 10.4-inch display, and 4MB RAM.

 

[Eddy Pengelly]

Hmm… why did these time travelers decide to take something created in 1986 back to the past when they could have taken something which was state of the art in 1995?

I normally get asked first "Why not a flash drive instead of cd-roms ?"
A flash drive would be wiped of its data when it is confronted with the magnetic forces of a time trip - thus becoming useless.
A physical cd-rom would not: which then leads to the general question "Why an early 1990s desktop computer ?"

An early 386/486 Desktop PC could be upgraded with the 'new technoloy' of a two-speed compact disk drive - which was required to run the cd-roms.
As it happened in Australia (in 1993), Ronald Pegg actually owned such a computer, and when he upgraded it to having a disk-drive, it came WITH the Grolier Encyclopedia cd-rom.
He was able to recognize the same technology (and the cd-roms) being described in ancient texts - because he personally owned that technology.

BTW, was the Compaq Deskpro 386 solar powered?

Probably not. There are two current hypotheses:
1. The tt-transport box had batteries included in order to run the computer;
2. people who could build and power a time machine would be able to include an inverter to power a computer.

 

[Eddy Pengelly]

Just to point out that you stated:
... and then you stated:
Apparently, you're not quite sure of your facts.

That is not the case:
1.
"a particular cd-rom from the mid 1990s was taken back to the past and shown to certain historical people" refers to the 1995 Ancients cd-rom.
I usually state just 'the 1990s' to include all three cd-roms; being the 1993 Grolier | the 1995 Ancients | and the 1998 RedShift2 cd-roms.
In this case the "particular" one is in the middle - 1995.

2.
"(eg. mouse & cable; dating it to early 1990s), was similar to a 386/486 Desktop PC"
Apparently some computers were being produced in the late 1980s; but in Australia they were not generally sold here until the early 1990s.
Ronald Pegg bought his in the early 1990s and upgraded to a cd-drive in 1993.

The computer was from the early 1990s, while the cd-roms ranged from 1993 to 1998; but the particular one stated was produced exactly in the mid 1990s - in 1995. I am absolutely sure of my facts.

 

[SRL+]

Eddy, with all due respect you have been rehashing the same theory here since 2008, but in all honesty, I have an extremely difficult time buying any of it.

 

[Eddy Pengelly]

How to Read and Examine the Time Travel Papers

Reviewing an academic PAPER is not like reading a book, report, or newspaper where you can jump around the article and choose where to start and what to actually read.

To review a paper it is best to read the paper sequentially, from start to finish.
Each sentence may present new ideas or information that you need to know and/or verify before you move on to later sections.

Always start with the Abstract, as it should provide the what (the premise), the how (methods used), the results, the conclusion, and why this paper is important and relevant to today's societies.

While some academics like to next read the Results followed by the Conclusion sections before they commence their read through, for the general public it is best to start with the Introduction.

While you are reading a paper, you are to be only concerned with the presented statements, references, and evidence contained within that paper.
All this has to make sense in the context of the methodology used and what is being revealed, and be fully addressed in the results and discussion sections.

Your preconceived beliefs (or lack of knowledge regarding the presented topic) may result in you having questions, and is why you need to write things down as you go.

Your primary role is judging the research content (and not the author).
Is the evidence relevant, and does the article convincingly analyse and interpret the evidence?
Are the conclusions consistent with the evidence and arguments presented ? Do they address the main question posed ?

You will be working with a PDF version (best viewed on a computer screen).
Many reviewers read the PDF in one window and have a separate window open containing a word processing file, ready for comments to be typed.

This Time Travel paper is in three parts. You must start with Part One and only look at the next part when you have finished your read and have written down all that you need to comment about (if you are going to contact the publisher and provide feedback).

To review this paper, you only need: an open mind; the knowledge of reading in English; being able to search for and check cited references; and the ability to compare the verified citations to extracted test data.

While you are able to download all three Parts of the Paper to your computer, it is best to only open and read one at a time, in order 1, 2, 3, as each part introduces new concepts that may confuse you if you read them before understanding the earlier findings.

Link to download Papers 1, 2 & 3
For members unable to download the papers, I will next present the FINDINGS section for each of the first three papers.