Hi Schticknz!
I would say that the fact that the news clip didn't show anyone using or apparently even carrying a camera (other than the TV videographer, of course), doesn't necessarily mean that people don't take cameras out there; it just means that none of the footage the videographer took that day, or at least none of the footage that wasn't edited out, happens to show people having them.
I admit it seems odd at first thought that the folks there didn't seem to be filming it, but if they're locals who knows how many times they've seen it before? After a while it would be like filming the laid-off factory worker who delivers your paper each day. And as strange as it might seem I think some people, particularly in poorer or "less wired" areas, just aren't big picture-takers, even when going out to see something like weird lights in the sky. I think that for a lot of people (myself included) the focus of their excitement is more on the idea that they are going to experience something and
see it with their own eyes, and if they think of bringing cameras along at all it's only as an afterthought.
Granted, probably there's going to be at least
one person who brings a camera or a cellphone and takes a million pictures, but at the same time I've heard this argument of no picture-takers used as a debunking technique to dismiss group sightings of paranormal phenomena out of hand (not that I'm lumping you in with debunkers) and it's always seemed to me that it's not quite as damning a point as they seem to believe.
But, all this being said, even if some well-supplied person did happen to bring telephoto lenses, infra-red cameras, or the like, what would it effectively prove to science? Only that the photos are either faked, or else show something perfectly mundane for which any old explanation can be tossed off from an armchair.
A great example of this is the
Brown Mountain Lights in North Carolina, which were investigated by scientists from the U.S. Geological Survey who actually bothered to go on site several times during the first half of the twentieth century. The first investigation explained them away as train headlights, either not knowing or not caring that the lights had been seen by whites since before the Revolution (when there were no trains) and by Native Americans before that; the second explained them away as marsh gasses, either not knowing or not caring that there are no marshes on or around Brown Mountain (although, curiously enough, the report
did state that the light from combusted marsh gasses would be to weak to be seen from miles away, which the Brown Mountain lights
can be).