Robert Baird
Paranormal Maven
I like to think Chardin was involved with hoaxing the British academic community in the Piltdown Man affair. There are only a few people who could have done it - the other likely suspect is Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. Chardin called for a "Conspiracy of Love" and he knew Love was more than a NEED.
Sometimes people create very advanced hoaxes to make an attempt to put society in it's proper place, Conan Doyle was one of the most dedicated spiritual/spiritism researchers and though his claim to fame is Sherlock Holmes he did not like just being a writer. His mind was first rate as we know from reading Sherlock's adventures or seeing all the movies and TV shows.
If he had been a Professor like William James (who was equally dedicated to the paranormal) he would not have been listened to any more. James was also ridiculed along with Sir William Crookes and other true scientists - because people NEED to BELIEVE not LEARN. Jung learned a great deal from James and his book Pragmatism which I think contributed heavily to Jung's archetypes and a growing awareness in the present day that Crookes and Faraday were right to support the Newtonian Aether. All of these scientists had an open mind and they integrated knowledge so most people could learn rather than for their own jargon infested and dogmatic fellow scholars. They did what Bucky did when he said "Whenever I find myself certain about something; I bite my tongue."
http://forum.world-mysteries.com/thr...=4002#post4002
Sometimes people create very advanced hoaxes to make an attempt to put society in it's proper place, Conan Doyle was one of the most dedicated spiritual/spiritism researchers and though his claim to fame is Sherlock Holmes he did not like just being a writer. His mind was first rate as we know from reading Sherlock's adventures or seeing all the movies and TV shows.
If he had been a Professor like William James (who was equally dedicated to the paranormal) he would not have been listened to any more. James was also ridiculed along with Sir William Crookes and other true scientists - because people NEED to BELIEVE not LEARN. Jung learned a great deal from James and his book Pragmatism which I think contributed heavily to Jung's archetypes and a growing awareness in the present day that Crookes and Faraday were right to support the Newtonian Aether. All of these scientists had an open mind and they integrated knowledge so most people could learn rather than for their own jargon infested and dogmatic fellow scholars. They did what Bucky did when he said "Whenever I find myself certain about something; I bite my tongue."
http://forum.world-mysteries.com/thr...=4002#post4002