russhorseman
Not Too Deep A Thinker
Just finished listening to the show. I knew Nancy from when she spoke at our Gulf Breeze conferences many many years ago. She's kept in contact with our small group of friends throughout the years. I can state with confidence that the Nancy I knew would not take part in any hoaxes (not that Gene or Dave even suggested that). She's an old-school "paper" researcher, and by that I mean that she is technology challenged. If I remember correctly, she didn't even use PowerPoint in her lectures, relying instead on transparencies.
However...
David, I think you really gave her lots to think about, especially when it comes to acquiring video evidence. Since she's bringing Robert's case into the spotlight (with the book she is going to write), she'll have to anticipate EVERYONE asking her about the lack of video. It is a glaring omission for a researcher of Nancy's caliber. Even if Robert is as technically challenged as Nancy, anyone can shoot video with a cell phone nowadays.
I'm also not an orb fan. With all the other photo/documentation she has, Nancy needs to toss those aside.
There was an excellent dynamic between David and Nancy in the first hour with the crop circle discussion, however. That's the Nancy I remember.
Another nice show, guys.
However...
David, I think you really gave her lots to think about, especially when it comes to acquiring video evidence. Since she's bringing Robert's case into the spotlight (with the book she is going to write), she'll have to anticipate EVERYONE asking her about the lack of video. It is a glaring omission for a researcher of Nancy's caliber. Even if Robert is as technically challenged as Nancy, anyone can shoot video with a cell phone nowadays.
I'm also not an orb fan. With all the other photo/documentation she has, Nancy needs to toss those aside.
There was an excellent dynamic between David and Nancy in the first hour with the crop circle discussion, however. That's the Nancy I remember.
Another nice show, guys.