NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!
You haven't even had time to watch the video before commenting. Anyone who doubts this can simply check the length of the video and Gene's timestamp.This item from a sketchy source is complaining about alleged censorship not about whether fact-checkers are reliable.
I expect a story that fails the fact-checking process will not be published. I don't mind if fake news is censored.
Next.....
Apparently there aren't many of them left .And one more thing: Responsible journalists, imperfect as they may be, will correct stories when errors are found.
This is not about one of those fact-checking sites. It's about an argument over a publisher fact-checking something. Nice try.This one deals directly with information about COVID, so naturally Gene will want to censor it rather than allow the evidence to speak for itself.
Who fact checks the fact checkers ?
There are quite a few, but the sites you link to seldom have any.Apparently there aren't many of them left .
Again, I'm not seeing evidence that the major fact-checking sites aren't reliable. Bad deflection on your part.And now for a little fact checking mockery ...
The Fact Checkers
And again you couldn't have watched the presentation before commenting — or you would have noticed the quotes from fact checkers on the issue he has the the actual source info for.This is not about one of those fact-checking sites. It's about an argument over a publisher fact-checking something. Nice try.
You haven't even had time to watch the video before commenting. Anyone who doubts this can simply check the length of the video and Gene's timestamp.
That is your unsubstantiated opinion after not watching the content posted ... and as it will likely remain unsubstantiated, how about we let a few other people weigh in? Or is there anyone else left here anymore?You failed to provide anything that relates to the reliability of fact-checking sites. Period ...
You have not substantiated your claim that fact-checking sites aren’t reliable. You’ve made no effort to address the core issue. You’ve just clumsily danced around the subject.That is your unsubstantiated opinion after not watching the content posted ... and as it will likely remain unsubstantiated, how about we let a few other people weigh in? Or is there anyone else left here anymore?