Sean Elifritz
Administrator
The latter half of this may have been posted here before but I don't think the first part has been.
This is 2 short clips basically glued together. The first part concerns the sightings and a videotape of the 8-8:30 triangle that many people claim could not have been jets in formation because the lights were allegedly too steady in relation to one another. But this clip shows that in fact the lights did display variations in position and therefor jets flying in a V-formation is a perfectly logical conclusion to arrive at. The second segment is an analysis done of the videos of the 10:00 sightings. The results make it glaringly obvious that the lights were merely flares passing behind mountains.
Yeah, I'm fully aware that the 10:00 PM sightings were already a dead issue for all but the lunatic fringe. But many have still been clinging to the 8-8:30 triangle as something possibly extraordinary. Heck, James Fox included it in his excellent documentary, I Know What I Saw. But then I watched this old documentary again (Hadn't seen it in years) and was pretty surprised by that segment where the man that got the only videotape of it admitted that the lights had moved independently of each other. And they also show some diagrams of exactly how they moved. Don't know how I had failed to remember that but somehow I did. Given this information it seems to me that the earlier sightings need to be dismissed as well.
Absolutely superb documentary. It's called UFOs Over Phoenix: Anatomy of a Sighting. They had this case whipped a long time ago but as happens so often when it comes to UFOs many are unaware of it or have chosen to ignore it.
This is 2 short clips basically glued together. The first part concerns the sightings and a videotape of the 8-8:30 triangle that many people claim could not have been jets in formation because the lights were allegedly too steady in relation to one another. But this clip shows that in fact the lights did display variations in position and therefor jets flying in a V-formation is a perfectly logical conclusion to arrive at. The second segment is an analysis done of the videos of the 10:00 sightings. The results make it glaringly obvious that the lights were merely flares passing behind mountains.
Yeah, I'm fully aware that the 10:00 PM sightings were already a dead issue for all but the lunatic fringe. But many have still been clinging to the 8-8:30 triangle as something possibly extraordinary. Heck, James Fox included it in his excellent documentary, I Know What I Saw. But then I watched this old documentary again (Hadn't seen it in years) and was pretty surprised by that segment where the man that got the only videotape of it admitted that the lights had moved independently of each other. And they also show some diagrams of exactly how they moved. Don't know how I had failed to remember that but somehow I did. Given this information it seems to me that the earlier sightings need to be dismissed as well.
Absolutely superb documentary. It's called UFOs Over Phoenix: Anatomy of a Sighting. They had this case whipped a long time ago but as happens so often when it comes to UFOs many are unaware of it or have chosen to ignore it.