Dear Diary - Fauci et al

[Tyger]

As previously stated you live in a very different reality than I do. You subscribe to series of different conspiracies across a very wide spectrum. I, on the other hand, do not believe in any of them.

I'd be interested in you describing in detail what it is exactly you think I believe that is a conspiracy theory.

Hillary Clinton saying the 2016 election she lost was a fraud, was stolen by Trump is a conspiracy theory? I am reporting what I heard for years from Hilary about her loss in 2016. No conspiracy, except maybe from her end.

Regarding January 6th you are stuck on the initial reporting of that event - we have far more knowledge of what went on that afternoon, and even in real time it was heavily biased reporting. Have you watched the videos? We can actually see the FBI operatives instructing the 'rioters' what to do and where to go. None of the FBI operatives were ever brought to account. Conspiracy? Something strange was afoot that day, and whatever conspiracy was afoot it was from the left.

The fact that I disaprove of Biden inviting Trans Queer Queens onto the White House Lawn to dance in front of children is a conspiracy theory?

My stating that I think you misunderstand what America is about re 'different peoples' is not conspiracy, it's just the way it is. We are a 'melting pot' because newcomers merge with American values, not because we take care of them in any unique way. We just accept people. We have an older community of Muslim Americans scattered throughout the country that have perfectly assimilated - they share and respect American values. They voted for Trump in 2024. We expect assimilation. That's not a conspiracy.

What about any of that do you disagree with? You are okay with the trans movement? If you are then we do disagree. You are okay with the kangaroo court the Jan 6th committee engaged? Then we disagree. My statement about Hilary Clinton is factual, from personal experience. My clarifications about American values stands, In the recent past we could always disagree without turning on one's heel "in high dudgeon." Times have changed, like the everyday use of foul language. It's a strange strange time we are in.

Not really that long ago - 60 years - Ronald Reagan ages well ...

Truer words: Comment @17:00 "......timeless and with universal application."
Ronald Reagan: Interview at the Start of his Political Career in 1966 (Colorized & Remastered)

Published May 23, 2024: [Video Run Time 26:17] DustyArchiver Channel
"Ronald Reagan in a 1966 interview with John Morgan for the BBC, as he campaigns for California's governorship. This colorized and remastered footage captures the former film star's early political vision and charisma."

 

[SRL+]

As this forum’s provocateur, I’d expect anything less.

 

[Tyger]

SENIOR ADVISOR TO FAUCI JUST PLEADED GUILTY TO CHARGES BROUGHT BY USA DEPT OF JUSTICE...

Breaking news
Yet another day of doing the work studiously avoided by the NZ legacy media.
Just popping in to let you know that yesterday (Aug 18 2026) David Morens (a former senior advisor in the NIAID Office of the Director, 2006–2022, often described as a close adviser to Anthony Fauci)....

PLEAD GUILTY TO CRIMINAL CHARGES BROUGHT BY THE AMERICAN DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
to:
ONE COUNT OF CONSPIRACY TO COMMITT OFFENSES AND DEFRAUD THE UNITED STATES
He admitted to participating in a scheme (with at least one other person) to HIDE FEDERAL RECORDS related to COVID-19 origins discussions and a terminated NIH bat-coronavirus research grant (linked to work involving the Wuhan Institute of Virology / EcoHealth Alliance) in order to evade Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests and the Federal Records

He faces a maximum of 5 years in prison (plus potential fine up to $250,000 and supervised release); sentencing is scheduled for November 12, 2026.

This could well backtrack all the way to Fauci himself.

Previously, Morens claimed in his own emails that he could route sensitive information to Fauci via Fauci’s private Gmail account or by handing documents over in person, describing this as a “secret back channel” and saying Fauci was “too smart” to allow colleagues to send him material that could cause trouble if FOIA’d.

He also speculated that Fauci had deleted related emails himself. These were Morens’ statements; no direct instructions from Fauci appear in the records, and Fauci has denied any such involvement or use of personal email for official business.

6.6K views · 408 reactions | SENIOR ADVISOR TO FAUCI JUST PLEADED GUILTY TO CHARGES BROUGHT BY USA DEPT OF JUSTICE... Breaking news Yet another day of doing the work studiously avoided by the NZ legacy media. Just popping in to let you know that

SENIOR ADVISOR TO FAUCI JUST PLEADED GUILTY TO CHARGES BROUGHT BY USA DEPT OF JUSTICE... Breaking news Yet another day of doing the work studiously avoided by the NZ legacy media. Just popping in...

www.facebook.com

 

[Tyger]

"What happens when public statements don't always line up over time?

"This video compiles years of interviews, hearings, and public appearances involving Dr. Anthony Fauci, highlighting how his messaging on topics like masks, social distancing, vaccines, and the origins of COVID-19 changed throughout the pandemic.

"For many people, these shifts raised difficult questions. Were the changes simply the result of evolving science, or were important conversations left unanswered?

"Now ask yourself...If the people we trusted most changed their message over and over, what else deserves a second look?

"This isn't about telling you what to believe. It's about asking whether you've seen the full picture.

"Watch the video. Compare it with what you remember. Then ask yourself one simple question:
Were you given the whole story ... or only the version you were meant to hear?"

[Video Run Time 22:05]

57K views · 1.9K reactions | What happens when public statements don't always line up over time? This video compiles years of interviews, hearings, and public appearances involving Dr. Anthony Fauci, highlighting how his messaging on topics like mas

What happens when public statements don't always line up over time? This video compiles years of interviews, hearings, and public appearances involving Dr. Anthony Fauci, highlighting how his...

www.facebook.com

 

[Tyger]

USA DIRECTOR OF FBI JUST ANNOUNCED - FAUCI ASSOCIATE PLEADS GUILTY TO CONSPIRACY

Quote:
After an FBI investigation with our DOJ partners, DR FAUCI'S ASSOCIATE David Morens, just pleaded guilty to conspiracy in a scheme to avoid FOIA requests and the Federal Records Act connected to COVID-19 research grants.

The FBI uncovered that Morens, Co-Conspirator 1, Co-Conspirator 2, and others conspired during the COVID-19 pandemic to defraud the United States after the National Institutes of Health terminated Co-Conspirator 1’s grant.

NIH terminated the grant, “Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence,” based on allegations that COVID-19 emerged from the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) in Wuhan, China.

Mr. Morens and his co-conspirators then agreed in writing to intentionally HIDE THEIR COMMUNICATIONS FROM PUBLIC VIEW view by corresponding through Morens’s personal Gmail account rather than his official NIH email account.

This FBI investigation remains ongoing. No one is above the law.

FBI Director - Kash Patel

https://twitter.com/x/status/2089831522408821051

 

[Randall]

SENIOR ADVISOR TO FAUCI JUST PLEADED GUILTY TO CHARGES BROUGHT BY USA DEPT OF JUSTICE...

ONE COUNT OF CONSPIRACY TO COMMITT OFFENSES AND DEFRAUD THE UNITED STATES
He admitted to participating in a scheme (with at least one other person) to HIDE FEDERAL RECORDS related to COVID-19 origins discussions and a terminated NIH bat-coronavirus research grant (linked to work involving the Wuhan Institute of Virology / EcoHealth Alliance) in order to evade Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests and the Federal Records

He faces a maximum of 5 years in prison (plus potential fine up to $250,000 and supervised release); sentencing is scheduled for November 12, 2026.

This could well backtrack all the way to Fauci himself.

They'll need a few fall guys without Presidential Pardons to feed to the masses — the big fish will likely still walk away free.

 

[Tyger]

From an Arendtian perspective, COVID was not only a medical crisis; it was an epistemological one also. Arendt argued that totalitarianism begins with the destruction of a shared reality. When officials like Fauci treat truth as malleable — changing it to fit political needs, union demands, or bureaucratic convenience — we all begin to lose the capacity to judge. This is the precondition for what Arendt called the “totalitarian impulse,” a moving toward governance by confusion, fear, and moral certainties instead of the truth.

Her famous quote, which is excerpted in The New Yorker article, perfectly captures the Faucian moment: “A lying government which pursues different goals at different times has constantly to rewrite its own history. That means that people are deprived not only of their capacity to act, but also of their capacity to think and to judge. And with such a people you can then do what you please.”

In Arendt’s Origins of Totalitarianism, she observes that bureaucratic despotism hollows out legislatures as executives rule by decree. Like a dictator, Fauci became the “infallible leader” whose words could never be questioned and whose lies were turned into a functioning reality. We all had to accommodate ourselves to Fauci’s fictions — some of us with a growing cynicism as he denigrated President Trump and publicly insulted one of our own Senators, telling him that the senator “did not know what he was talking about.”

 

[Tyger]

Hannah Arendt’s Resonant Warning About Public Lying in the Age of Anthony Fauci
Habitual government deception produces something more dangerous than false belief. The Fauci era shows how.

Hannah Arendt’s Resonant Warning About Public Lying in the Age of Anthony Fauci – The American Spectator | USA News and Politics

In the most recent issue of The New Yorker, there is a long, reflective essay on Hannah Arendt, one of the 20th century’s most important analysts of the forces that give rise to totalitarianism. The essay emphasized Arendt’s most important insight on the danger of pervasive lying by government...

spectator.org

 

[Tyger]

An excellent summary, analysis and context given for the content of 'the Fauci Diaries'.

The Epoch Times - American Thought Leaders
Top 10 Biggest Revelations From the Fauci Diaries | Jeffrey Tucker
Published August 20, 2026: [Video Run Time 1:12:19]

"A trove of newly released documents, colloquially known as the 'Fauci Diaries,' offer an unusually revealing window into the decisions and dynamics that shaped the COVID-19 era.

"Jeffrey Tucker spent days reading all the documents - over 1,100 pages of materials - which were prepared within the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and appear to have been intended, at least in part, as the foundation for an autobiography.

"Tucker argues that these records offer key insights into what Dr. Anthony Fauci knew, when he knew it, and how that knowledge influenced public messaging and policy.

"We discuss the early push for an mRNA vaccine, the influential WHO delegation to China in February 2020, the origins and consequences of lockdown policies, and Fauci’s relationship with the media.

- Why did so many countries adopt elements of China’s COVID response?
- What do the documents reveal about the debate over the lab-leak theory?
- And why did the vaccination push intensify even as breakthrough infections became increasingly apparent?

"We also examine the clash between Fauci and President Donald Trump, the treatment of dissenting scientists behind the Great Barrington Declaration, and the broader question of how the official history of the pandemic will be written."

Live Link Below

Top 10 Biggest Revelations From the Fauci Diaries | Jeffrey Tucker

The newly released documents offer an unusually revealing window into the decisions and dynamics that shaped the COVID-19 era.

www.theepochtimes.com

 

[Randall]

From an Arendtian perspective, COVID was not only a medical crisis; it was an epistemological one also. Arendt argued that totalitarianism begins with the destruction of a shared reality. When officials like Fauci treat truth as malleable — changing it to fit political needs, union demands, or bureaucratic convenience — we all begin to lose the capacity to judge. This is the precondition for what Arendt called the “totalitarian impulse,” a moving toward governance by confusion, fear, and moral certainties instead of the truth.

Her famous quote, which is excerpted in The New Yorker article, perfectly captures the Faucian moment: “A lying government which pursues different goals at different times has constantly to rewrite its own history. That means that people are deprived not only of their capacity to act, but also of their capacity to think and to judge. And with such a people you can then do what you please.”

In Arendt’s Origins of Totalitarianism, she observes that bureaucratic despotism hollows out legislatures as executives rule by decree. Like a dictator, Fauci became the “infallible leader” whose words could never be questioned and whose lies were turned into a functioning reality. We all had to accommodate ourselves to Fauci’s fictions — some of us with a growing cynicism as he denigrated President Trump and publicly insulted one of our own Senators, telling him that the senator “did not know what he was talking about.”

Excellent quote. Were you of this mindset back in 2013 when you joined the forum?

 

[Tyger]

Katie Jenkins Metzger [X] -

"If you had trusted the settled science of the day, here is how it would have gone."

1890s: you dose the baby with Bayer's new cough syrup, the non-addictive alternative to morphine, marketed for children. It was heroin. They named it after the German for heroic.

1900s: you rub calomel teething powder on your infant's gums. It is a mercury compound, and it leaves a generation with pink disease. Swollen, peeling hands and feet, screaming for months, and some of them died.

1910s: you cook in Crisco, launched by a soap and candle company, because cottonseed oil is modern and lard is what your mother used. The process that made it solid produced trans fat, banned outright a century later.

1920s: you drink Radithor, certified radioactive water, on prescription. Eben Byers took fourteen hundred bottles for his vitality. His jaw was removed in pieces and he was buried in a lead coffin.

1930s: a chemist dissolves a new sulfa drug in diethylene glycol, which is antifreeze. It kills 107 people, mostly children, and only then does America give the FDA power to demand safety testing.

1940s: your doctor lights a Camel in the surgery. More doctors smoke them than any other brand, and the advert runs in the Journal of the American Medical Association, which sold him the page.

1950s: DDT is sprayed over your kitchen, your garden and your children at school. The man who found its insecticidal properties has already been given a Nobel Prize.

1960s: your wife takes thalidomide for morning sickness because it is remarkably safe. More than ten thousand children are born with missing and shortened limbs.

1970s: the country puts down the butter and picks up the margarine, on the instruction of the American Heart Association. The fat everybody switched to was banned in 2015 as unsafe at any level.

1980s: the fat comes out of everything and sugar goes back in to make it edible. Obesity begins a climb it has never come off.

1990s: your father is prescribed OxyContin, because fewer than one per cent get addicted. The company later pleads guilty to criminal misbranding, and the overdose count runs into hundreds of thousands.

2000s: you take Vioxx for your knee. It is pulled in 2004, and the FDA's own safety officer estimates tens of thousands of excess heart attacks.

"Not one of those was fringe. Every one had a professional body, a literature and a man in a white coat standing behind it.

"Nobody who followed that advice was stupid. They were obedient, to the most qualified people available.

"Settled is a word about money. It means the questions stopped being funded, so they stopped being asked.

"So which of today's instructions will your grandchildren read out in disbelief.

"The oil washed in hexane and built into every cell you own. The statin that blocks the pathway making your hormones, to prevent one heart attack per hundred people. The injection where a third of the loss is muscle. The infant formula built out of vegetable oil.

"All settled. None of it funded to be otherwise."

 

[Tyger]

'The Hidden Hand' has been at work. No posts have been deleted. For now only three recent posts have been moved from this Fauci thread to 'The Legacy of Covid Vaccines'. My first attempt at such and it appears to have gone well. I'm learning. No one has complained - yet.

Reminder: this thread was intended to do with Fauci's 'diary'.

There is another thread 'The Legacy of Covid Vaccines' to do with all aspects of vaccines.

Doing these moves is not simple because a post can be interwoven with a lot of stuff so when it gets complicated my tendency seems to be to just let the post stay where it was put. 'Stand alone' posts with links or videos, and no discussion are easier to categorize.

Overall, I'm not looking for work. Just when things go radically off-topic like with Randall's thread about something-or-other - forget what now. I was to blame with that one. The unsnarl on that thread - whatever it's called - will happen shortly. Plus Red's thread on reading. Soon.

 

[Tyger]

Ben Habib
A͏u͏g͏u͏s͏t͏ ͏2͏0͏ ͏

"Peter Daszak, the British zoologist at the heart of Wuhan bat research, plotted with a senior US official to kill the Covid lab-leak theory and revive the funding. Court documents show bottles of wine and promises of fancy dinners in exchange for 'shenanigans.' Morens has now pleaded guilty. The people who demanded we 'trust the science' were busy manufacturing the narrative. Every single person involved must be held accountable."

 

[Randall]

Jeffrey Tucker read 1,000 pages of Fauci’s diaries. Here’s what he found​

Jeffrey Tucker, founder of the Brownstone Institute and a longtime critic of the government’s pandemic response, said he spent days reviewing the records and came away more troubled by Fauci’s conduct than he expected.

“It’s a massive treatise, but it is utterly fascinating,” Tucker told The National News Desk. “No matter how many bad thoughts I’ve had about Fauci in the past, nothing could have prepared me for what I read in that diary.”

Tucker argued the entries reveal Fauci paid significant attention to his growing celebrity status and public reputation during the pandemic.

 

[Tyger]

Okay, so this thread still remains to be cleaned up. All of the posts from the 'Whatcha Reading' thread have been trundled over here, so now all those posts need to be separated by posts about vaccines and posts about Fauci.

Keep in mind that this thread is about all things Fauci - anything else, vaccines covid or otherwise, go on 'The Legacy of Covid Vaccines'.

Many thanks.

 

[Randall]

Evidence that the US government pandemic response led by now disgraced Dr Anthony Fauci knew about damage to the fetus from genetic COVID-19 vaccination.

Fauci, Fraud, & Harm to Mothers and Babies with COVID-19 Vaccination

 

[Tyger]

I see the following text as relevant to Fauci because it details what Fauci et al knew and yet still continued with the rollout.
The Vaccine Safety Report in the first months directly contradicts Fauci declaring the covid vaccines were 'safe and effective'.


THE DATA FROM THE LAST 6 YEARS IS ALARMING AND MOST PEOPLE HAVE NEVER SEEN PFIZER’S FIRST COVID VACCINE SAFETY REPORT IN THE FIRST MONTHS.

I [Lindy Werwa] have. And I’m appalled. And after reading the actual document, I think everyone should know what was being reported in the FIRST months of the rollout. Not rumors. Not memes. Not someone’s interpretation. The actual numbers.

Pfizer’s first major cumulative post-authorization safety analysis covered reports received from the beginning of the worldwide rollout through February 28, 2021. Approximately three months. By that point, Pfizer’s worldwide safety database contained: 42,086 adverse-event cases representing 158,893 individual adverse events.

And among those 42,086 cases: 1,223 had fatal outcomes. 11,361 had NOT recovered at the time the report was recorded.

Stop there for a minute. This was February 2021. We were barely into the worldwide rollout. And these weren’t simply sore arms, headaches and fevers. Look at what was already being reported and evaluated.

CARDIOVASCULAR
1,403 cardiovascular cases
1,098 tachycardia
102 arrhythmia
89 myocardial infarction
80 cardiac failure
41 acute myocardial infarction
7 cardiogenic shock
136 fatal outcomes were reported within the cardiovascular category.

NEUROLOGICAL
501 neurological cases
204 seizures
83 epilepsy
33 generalized tonic-clonic seizures
24 Guillain-Barré syndrome
17 trigeminal neuralgia
11 transverse myelitis
10 multiple-sclerosis relapses
10 optic neuritis
There were also reports involving encephalopathy, demyelination, meningitis, narcolepsy, ataxia and other neurological conditions.
16 fatal outcomes were reported within the neurological category.

STROKE
275 stroke cases
160 cerebrovascular accidents
41 ischemic strokes
26 cerebral hemorrhages
15 cerebral infarctions
11 hemorrhagic strokes
There were also reports involving cerebral thrombosis, cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, lacunar infarction and thrombotic stroke.
61 fatal outcomes were reported within the stroke category.

BLOOD CLOTS
151 thromboembolic cases
60 pulmonary embolisms
39 thromboses
35 deep-vein thromboses
Of 168 thromboembolic events reported, 165 were classified as serious.
18 fatal outcomes were reported within this category.

IMMUNE AND AUTOIMMUNE
1,050 immune-mediated/autoimmune cases
49 peripheral neuropathy
32 pericarditis
25 myocarditis
16 diabetes mellitus
16 encephalitis
14 psoriasis
11 autoimmune disorders

FACIAL PARALYSIS
449 cases.
Of 453 events, 399 were classified as serious.
At the time of reporting, 183 had not resolved.

KIDNEY INJURY
69 renal cases
40 acute kidney injuries
30 renal-failure events
All 70 renal events were classified as serious.
23 fatal outcomes were reported within this category.

HERPES VIRUS EVENTS
The database also contained:
259 herpes zoster events
80 oral herpes events
17 herpes-virus infections
13 herpes simplex events
10 ophthalmic herpes zoster events

PREGNANCY
Pfizer had information involving 270 unique pregnancies.
Among the reported outcomes were:
23 spontaneous abortions
2 premature births with neonatal death
But this is extremely important:
Pregnancy outcomes were unavailable for 238 of the 270 pregnancies.

AND THEN I FOUND THIS.
Pfizer said the volume of adverse-event reports was so large that approximately 600 additional full-time employees had already been brought in to process them. And Pfizer anticipated bringing in more than 1,800 additional resources by the end of June 2021.

Again: This was happening within MONTHS of rollout. These databases contain events reported after vaccination. They are surveillance systems.
But that is precisely why this information matters. Because pharmacovigilance exists to find signals before causation has necessarily been established. You collect the reports. You look for patterns. You investigate. You compare what you’re seeing against what would normally be expected. And when a signal becomes strong enough, you act. YOU PULL THE DRUG before any more people are harmed or killed.

So what happened next?
2021: THE REPORTS KEPT COMING

The U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, VAERS, was receiving hundreds of thousands of reports following COVID vaccination. And something particularly important happened. Myocarditis began emerging as a recognizable signal.

Remember: Pfizer’s February 2021 report already contained: 25 myocarditis reports and 32 pericarditis reports. By April 2021, cases of myocarditis following COVID vaccination, particularly among young males, were being reported to VAERS. Eventually the evidence became strong enough that myocarditis and pericarditis became OFFICIALLY recognized risks of mRNA COVID vaccination.

Think about that. Something visible in those early safety reports eventually became an acknowledged vaccine adverse effect.

2022
VAERS continued accumulating reports following COVID vaccination.
In the current public VAERS dataset, records associated with COVID vaccines and received during 2022 include approximately:
221,580 adverse-event reports
8,133 records mentioning death
38,360 involving hospitalization
Again, these are reports following vaccination.

BY MARCH 2023 CDC itself reported something that I think everyone deserves to know. By March 1, 2023, VAERS had received:
19,476 preliminary reports of death following COVID vaccination in the United States. CDC did NOT say that the vaccines caused 19,476 deaths. Why would they admit to this genocide?

2023
The current VAERS data contain approximately:
54,720 COVID-vaccine reports
2,087 records mentioning death
13,999 hospitalizations
received during 2023.

2024
Approximately:
20,246 reports
824 records mentioning death
2,117 hospitalizations

2025
Approximately:
10,644 reports
540 records mentioning death
1,211 hospitalizations

And something changed in 2025 that you need to know.
CDC and FDA expanded the public VAERS database to include certain secondary reports submitted by additional sources about the same patient, vaccine and dose. That means some records appearing in today’s database are different reports concerning the same underlying event.

2026
The federal VAERS files are currently processed through July 31, 2026.
The current data contain approximately:
500 COVID-vaccine reports received in 2026
20 records mentioning death
72 hospitalizations
And remember that reports can arrive long after the event itself, so the year a report was received is not necessarily the year the medical event occurred.

WHAT DOES THE CURRENT DATABASE SHOW?
Across the current public VAERS COVID-vaccine records from the beginning of the rollout through the available 2026 data, there are approximately:
1.076 MILLION adverse-event report records (read that again)
and
24,575 records mentioning death.

VAERS exists for a reason but also know that many deaths and adverse reactions are not reported. When someone gets diagnosed with turbo cancer or an athlete dies on the field from a heart attack, the dots do not always get connected. People are NOT reporting these heinous crimes against humanity. They just don’t know any better.

CDC itself says VAERS is designed to rapidly detect unusual or unexpected patterns of adverse events called SAFETY SIGNALS. And here is the part I cannot get past. Go back to February 2021. Within approximately three months, Pfizer already had:
42,086 cases.
158,893 adverse events.
1,223 cases with fatal outcomes.
11,361 people not recovered.

Cardiovascular events.
Neurological events.
Strokes.
Blood clots.
Seizures.
Guillain-Barré syndrome.
Transverse myelitis.
Facial paralysis.
Autoimmune events.
Kidney injuries.
Pregnancy events.
Myocarditis.
Pericarditis.
And such a volume of reports that Pfizer was dramatically expanding its pharmacovigilance workforce.

Those were SIGNALS.
And one of those signals, myocarditis and pericarditis, was subsequently recognized as causally associated with mRNA COVID vaccination.
Yet the rollout continued.
Eligibility expanded.
Younger populations were added.
Boosters followed.
Mandates followed.

So no, I don’t need to claim that every illness or every death reported after vaccination was caused by the vaccine. But I will lean very heavily on that data and connect the dots to determine that it is more than probable. What I DO know is what the documents show. And I believe these numbers should have generated enormous scrutiny, transparency and public discussion from the very beginning.

The question isn’t: “Can you prove every one of these events was caused by the vaccine?” That’s not how an early-warning system works.

The question is: HOW MANY SAFETY SIGNALS DOES IT TAKE BEFORE YOU HIT THE BRAKES?

Because informed consent isn’t simply telling people what has already been proven. It’s telling them what is being observed. What is being investigated. What is unknown. And what risks may be emerging. People deserved to know that. They deserved the numbers. They deserved the uncertainty. THEY DESERVED THE CHOICE. The documents exist. The reports exist. The numbers exist. Read them. Ask questions. And connect your own dots. It’s time people wake up to the aftermath of this long-planned genocide.

- Lindy Werwa

 

[Randall]

The question isn’t: “Can you prove every one of these events was caused by the vaccine?” That’s not how an early-warning system works.

The thing is, according to the Bradford Hill criteria for determining causation, the vaccine has now been proven to have caused some deaths. Scientists use these rules to decide true cause and a effect relationships.

• Temporality: The cause must come before the effect. This is the only absolute rule, e.g. The vax came before the injury.
• Strength: A high statistical association has been proven by adverse reporting systems and real-world patients.
• Consistency: Many reports from different patients at different places and times are similar.
• Specificity: A single cause ( the vax ) leads to a very specific outcome ( injury ).
• Cause/Effect Gradient: More vax results in increased incidence of injury while zero vax = zero vax injury.
• Plausibility: A known or sensible biological mechanism explains the link ( spike protein toxicity has been proven ).
• Coherence: The idea fits well with existing medical and scientific facts ( it fits well with the facts — but not the dogma ).
• Experiment: Real-world tests or interventions support the claim ( autopsies, MRIs, blood tests, and patient experiences ).
• Analogy: Similar factors or drugs cause similar effects ( There is a suppressed history of vaccine induced injuries and deaths ).

While these stringent rules have proven vaccine injuries are real, they have not proven that vaccines are either safe or effective, because vaccines violate rule number one ( Temporality ) by assuming that it prevents something that hasn't happened yet. In other words, vaccines don't work like antidotes to poisons, where you're bit by a snake first, and the antivenom is administered afterwards — relieving the symptoms in a direct cause-effect relationship.

Instead, efficacy has been assumed by claiming that the vax caused something not to happen later — which is impossible to prove. That's why nobody can show anyone ( not even one person ) who has been "saved" by the vax. It's all speculation based on self-serving statistical analysis done by the companies that stand to rake in billions of taxpayer dollars — without any accountability for damages.

So now that vaccine injury has been scientifically proven — will the vaxxers still "Follow the science" — or simply hand wave it. Of course — you and I already know that answer don't we. Many vaccine injured people have been told by physicians that it's all in their head — offhandedly dismissing their suffering while taking all the perks for pushing their poison.

 

[Tyger]

"I guess it depends on how you 'touch' the elephant. Statistics is a great tool of deception.
As Mark Twain famously said, 'There are three types of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics.'

Annual Deaths: Then vs Now

YEAR ANNUAL DEATHS / WORLD POPULATION / CRUDE DEATH RATE (PER 1,000)
1950 ~52 million / 2.5 billion / 20.8
1980 ~48 million / 4.4 billion / 10.9
2000 ~52 million / 6.1 billion / 8.5
2015 ~58 million / 7.4 billion / 7.8
2020 ~63 million / 7.8 billion / 8.1
2026 ~65 million / 8.2 billion / 7.9

"The crude death rate has fallen dramatically since 1950 (20.8 → 7.9 per 1,000), even though the raw number of deaths has risen. This is the classic demographic-transition pattern: population is growing faster than the per-capita death rate is falling."

 

[Randall]

​